View this post on the web at [link removed]

Please consider subscribing to help us reach our funding goals in an attempt to inform more Americans…
Peter Navarro, a former Trump White House adviser, has been penalized with a four-month prison term and directed to pay a $9,500 fine for disregarding a congressional subpoena issued by the House select committee investigating the events of January 6 at the U.S. Capitol. U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta delivered the sentence, signifying a significant development in the ongoing legal proceedings related to the January 6 events.
Navarro, who served as an adviser on trade and manufacturing policies under former President Donald Trump, was found guilty in September on two counts of contempt of Congress. His refusal to comply with a subpoena demanding his appearance and document production in early 2022 was rooted in his belief that Trump had invoked executive privilege—a contention that became a focal point during the trial.
The handed-down sentence is relatively lenient in comparison to the prosecutors' request for six months of imprisonment and a $200,000 fine. Navarro's case stands out, given its involvement with another high-ranking official from the previous administration.
WATCH:
Navarro's defense centered on the claim that he found himself entangled in a conflict between the legislative and executive branches, genuinely believing that executive privilege had been invoked. Conversely, the prosecution contended that Navarro's actions displayed a disregard for legal processes and congressional authority. The judge, recognizing Navarro's contributions to public service, expressed disappointment in his behavior and underscored the corrosive impact such actions have on the political landscape.
"The Defendant, like the rioters at the Capitol, put politics, not country, first, and stonewalled Congress’s investigation," wrote the prosecutors. "The Defendant chose allegiance to former President Donald Trump over the rule of law."
Prosecutor Elizabeth Aloi, in her final remarks to the jury, asserted that Navarro "had knowledge about a plan to delay the activities of Congress on January 6" and was "more than happy" to share that information in public statements but chose not to divulge it to the House committee.
The sentencing comes after a judge rejected Navarro’s bid for a new trial, where his attorneys argued that jurors might have been influenced by external factors. He plans to address this matter and more during the appeal process.
In court documents, his lawyers wrote, "The appeal of this case will definitely answer what is required of a former President to invoke executive privilege as to their senior advisors, and no future advisor will be in the same position of not knowing that the President they served had not properly invoked the privilege."
Known for his hawkish views on trade policy, especially with China, as Trump's aide, Navarro has been a controversial figure advocating for protectionist trade policies. His background includes being a professor of economics and public policy at the University of California, Irvine.
In September, prosecutors accused Navarro of acting "above the law" by refusing to comply with a subpoena from the House Jan. 6 committee, seeking documents and his testimony.
Navarro’s case is not isolated. It follows the conviction of Steve Bannon, another Trump adviser, who was also found guilty of contempt of Congress and sentenced to four months in prison. These cases collectively underscore the ongoing legal consequences stemming from the January 6 Capitol riot and the broader investigations into the events of that day.
As Navarro prepares to appeal the verdict, this case remains a significant chapter in the ongoing narrative of the January 6 investigations.
Please Subscribe To Read The Next Article…
SHOWDOWN: Republican Governors Across U.S. Stand with Texas Against Feds…...

Unsubscribe [link removed]?