Confused thinking, Keynesianism...and coronomics
Many thanks for joining us for this week’s IEA newsletter, on a week when it’s impossible to ignore the colossal impact of the coronavirus.

The true long-term implications of the outbreak have yet to emerge. But some of the measures proposed to curb the pandemic are already confusing and riddled with inconsistencies. Take, for example, the suggestion that the over-70s could be put into isolation for four months.

On our blog this week, IEA Editorial and Research Director Len Shackleton – himself a member of this ‘vulnerable’ group – questioned the wisdom and practicality of such measures.
Len points out that 10 million people fall into this category, with half a million over-70s still in the labour market.

He warns of the impact this could have on the economy - and of the unforeseen consequences such a move could have. And he discusses how, as a libertarian, he objects to the idea of defining whole groups of people based on statistical patterns. Read this thoughts here.

Also on our blog, Ryan Bourne, of the Cato Institute in Washington, warns of the dangers of “Corona Keynesianism”. He says commentators and economists proffering “fiscal stimulus” arguments to protect the economy are wrong – and their proposals are dangerous. Find out why here.
|