From xxxxxx <[email protected]>
Subject DOL Rule To Curb Employer Misclassification of Workers
Date January 20, 2024 11:35 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
[US Department of Labor issued a rule to prevent employers from
classifying workers as "independent contractors" ]
[[link removed]]

DOL RULE TO CURB EMPLOYER MISCLASSIFICATION OF WORKERS  
[[link removed]]


 

Heidi Shierholz
January 9, 2024
Economic Policy Institute
[[link removed]]


*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

_ US Department of Labor issued a rule to prevent employers from
classifying workers as "independent contractors" _

, getty

 

EPI welcomes the U.S. Department of Labor’s final rule issued today
[[link removed]] that will
combat employer misclassification of workers as independent
contractors and ensure that more workers can enjoy the rights and
protections they are already legally entitled to.

Employer misclassification of workers as independent contractors robs
workers of labor rights and threatens their economic security. Many
workers are harmed by employer misclassification—particularly those
in the lowest-wage and most difficult jobs, such as nail salon
workers, truck drivers, and construction workers. Allowing employers
to exploit loopholes in labor law puts these workers at greater risk.
A previous EPI analysis found that in 11 commonly misclassified
occupations
[[link removed]], workers
misclassified as independent contractors lose out on thousands of
dollars in earnings and benefits per year, compared with workers doing
the same job with employee status.

Since this rule was proposed, opponents of this rule have waged an
all-out misinformation war, claiming that independent entrepreneurs
and business owners will now be forced into employee status against
their will. The reality is that if the Trump administration’s rule
was allowed to stand, workers with far less power to actually set the
terms and conditions of their employment—not bonafide
contractors—would have continued to lose out on basic worker
protections, earnings, and benefits to which they should be entitled.

* workers rights
[[link removed]]
* independent contractors
[[link removed]]

*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

 

 

 

INTERPRET THE WORLD AND CHANGE IT

 

 

Submit via web
[[link removed]]

Submit via email
Frequently asked questions
[[link removed]]

Manage subscription
[[link removed]]

Visit xxxxxx.org
[[link removed]]

Twitter [[link removed]]

Facebook [[link removed]]

 




[link removed]

To unsubscribe, click the following link:
[link removed]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis

  • Sender: Portside
  • Political Party: n/a
  • Country: United States
  • State/Locality: n/a
  • Office: n/a
  • Email Providers:
    • L-Soft LISTSERV