January 20, 2024

Read in Browser [[link removed]]

POWERED BY

I’m heading back to Los Angeles this week to cover one of several court cases that could dictate the future of the NCAA, which is facing a crisis that only worsens by the day. There’s a growing consensus that athletes should get a bigger share of revenue they generate, but the NCAA and many administrators don’t want athletes to become employees. Those forces may not be able to stop an employee designation, though, if the courts have anything to say about it.

— Amanda Christovich [[link removed]]

The NCAA’s Existential Question: Can You Pay Players and Still Call Them Amateurs?

FOS Illustration

On Monday, in a conference room in Los Angeles, a National Labor Relations Board trial will resume, with the goal of resolving whether college athletes should be considered employees—the existential question of NCAA sports.

The trial is one of the many places where the debate over the future of amateurism is playing out across the country. Pressure to label collegiate athletes professionals is mounting through other National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) cases and multiple federal cases. The NCAA, meanwhile, is battling in Congress (most recently in a hearing on Thursday) to pass a law preventing those athletes from attaining employee status. The collegiate governing body is even facing criticism from some of its most high-profile constituents, like Michigan head coach Jim Harbaugh, who argued [[link removed]] after winning the national championship that athletes should get a share of revenue and the right to unionize. Ohio State’s new athletic director, Ross Bjork, echoed [[link removed]] some of Harbaugh’s comments on Wednesday.

Amid all the noise, NCAA President Charlie Baker is trying to appease all sides with a new athlete-pay proposal [[link removed]]. But it may not be enough to stop momentum toward an employment model.

“It’s [athletes’] voices that are often sidelined in conversations about the future,” Rep. Lori Trahan (D., Mass.) said during Thursday’s hearing in Congress. But “athletes have more power today than ever before.”

A Mountain of Litigation

Over the past five years, the NCAA has faced several lawsuits over athlete employment, including multiple cases at the NLRB.

The case that’s resuming on Monday centers around USC football and basketball players. The National College Players Association filed an “unfair labor practice” charge in 2022, claiming that USC, the Pac-12, and the NCAA have illegally misclassified football and basketball players as amateurs, rather than employees. The NLRB agreed to take up the case on the NCPA’s behalf and began in-person prosecution in December at the NLRB’s regional office in L.A. At the time, NCPA executive director Ramogi Huma told Front Office Sports he believed the initial days of the trial “couldn’t have gone better.”

That prosecution resumes on Jan. 22 and will continue for two weeks, with the potential for another session at the end of February, if needed. It will take months for the NLRB to hand down a decision.

On the other side of the country, Dartmouth men’s basketball players filed a different type of case with the NLRB: a unionization petition [[link removed]] similar to the case filed by Northwestern football players in 2014 (which ultimately failed). A hearing was carried out via Zoom in October, but a regional judge has yet to hand down a ruling. Even though those players are pursuing a slightly different legal avenue than in the USC case, a win would ultimately result in the same outcome: If athletes are allowed to unionize, they’d automatically be professionals.

Employment status is “not really up to athletes,” UCLA quarterback Chase Griffin said during Thursday’s Congressional NIL hearing. “That’s up to the NLRB. But I do think it’s important to note that currently—based on the number of time, effort, and hours—we operate as employees.” (The NLRB’s general counsel, Jennifer Abruzzo, does believe many athletes should be considered employees.)

The NLRB isn’t the only entity hearing cases on this matter. The furthest along is Johnson v. NCAA [[link removed]], in which Villanova football player Trey Johnson and several other plaintiffs argued that all Division I athletes should be employees and get paid minimum wage. That case is currently awaiting a decision from the Third Circuit Court of Appeals to determine whether professionalism for collegiate athletes is even plausible under the law, let alone whether it’s the correct designation. Athletes have filed other cases with similar premises.

Of all the cases facing the NCAA, none are calling for all athletes at all levels to be considered employees. But that hasn’t stopped President Baker and other anti-employee advocates from making arguments about the horrors that would befall college sports if all athletes, at all levels, are deemed employees.

It looks increasingly unlikely that the NCAA will bat 1.000 on all these legal attacks, experts agree. But a federal law overriding these court decisions would be the governing body’s ace in the hole.

Illusion of Reform

The NCAA is now trying to convince Congress to pass an anti-employee status law under the guise of “reform.” In December, Baker introduced “ Project DI [[link removed]],” a short, broad proposal for how schools could begin to pay athletes in a way that satisfies not only their demands, but also those of public opinion. The proposal has three main suggestions: 1) Allow schools to “share NIL revenue” with athletes. 2) Eliminate restrictions on educational benefits. And 3) Require a group of the richest schools to put money into an educational trust for athletes.

NCAA members are “glad we’re finally talking about the elephant in the room,” Baker said during his annual State of College Sports address at the 2024 NCAA Convention in Phoenix. He also noted during the Congressional hearing that the proposal could help increase gender equity in NIL by allowing athletes to sign deals alongside schools—and therefore be subject to Title IX. (Ironically, the project has already been cited by NLRB lawyers as an admission that athletes should be employees.)

But the proposal is less radical than some initially believed. While it tries to placate reformers by offering athletes increased pay, it stops short of giving them employee status. That’s by design.

Baker has said on multiple occasions that in order for the proposal to work, Congress must pass legislation declaring collegiate athletes to be amateurs once and for all. He’s requesting “special status” that allows those athletes to get paid, but not to be considered employees. That way, athletes could get some extra cash, but the NCAA’s business model would remain intact. (He has also said that the proposal is an attempt to demonstrate to Congress that the NCAA is doing its part to fix its own problems—so Congress should step in to fix the rest.)

“There is this sort of … desperation here,” College Football Players Association executive director Jason Stahl tells Front Office Sports. “ ‘We need you to rescue us.’ … Because, yeah, I do believe the NCAA knows that they are going to lose all these cases.”

But there’s another way for the NCAA to maintain control that it continues to openly reject: unionization and collective bargaining. Stahl and Athletes.org founder Jim Cavale, both of whom spoke with Front Office Sports, agree that this solution is the best way forward for the NCAA. “There’s a desire to continue trying to unilaterally impose comp restrictions on athletes,” Cavale says. “The real solution is not to do that. The real solution is to collectively bargain all of these terms with the respective athletes who create this value.”

Everyone has an opinion on the NCAA’s existential question. But ultimately, it doesn’t matter what athletes, schools, reformers, or even the NCAA president want. A judge will make the final decision over the future of amateurism—not based on the welfare of college sports, but based on the law.

SPONSORED BY NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY

Build Your Career in Sports

Elevate your career in the dynamic business of sports with Northwestern University’s MA in Sports Administration [[link removed]] program.

You’ll learn from experienced faculty with extensive connections to collegiate, professional, and amateur athletics as you develop robust strategic, creative, and analytical skills—important for success in this competitive field.

Build your network by connecting with current and future sports professionals [[link removed]], a vital aspect of building your sports career. Earn your prestigious Northwestern master’s degree entirely online, through evening courses in Chicago and Evanston, or a flexible combination of evening and online classes.

Propel your passion for sports into an exciting and rewarding career. Get started [[link removed]] today!

Related Reading ‘It Could Not Have Gone Better’ For the Athletes: First Session of NCAA Athlete Employment Trial Concludes [[link removed]]by Amanda Christovich [[link removed]]Inside the first three days of the trial over amateurism in L.A. Stage Set For Federal Labor Decision on College Athlete Employment Status [[link removed]]by Amanda Christovich [[link removed]]An NLRB hearing concluded over whether Dartmouth men’s basketball players can unionize. The NCAA’s Amateurism Model Is on Trial: Everything You Need To Know [[link removed]]by Amanda Christovich [[link removed]]A labor court in L.A. could reclassify some D-I athletes as employees. Question of NCAA Athletes as Employees Comes Under Focus [[link removed]]by Amanda Christovich [[link removed]]An appeals court considers a challenge to the NCAA’s business model. SURVEYS

Want a chance to win $250? We want to get to know our audience better and improve our coverage. Fill out our new survey [[link removed]] for a chance to win a $250 Visa gift card or free FOS merch!

Advertise [[link removed]] Awards [[link removed]] Learning [[link removed]] Video [[link removed]] Podcast [[link removed]] Sports Careers [[link removed]] Written by Amanda Christovich [[link removed]] Edited by Peter Richman [[link removed]], Brian Krikorian [[link removed]]

If this email was forwarded to you, you can subscribe here [[link removed]].

Update your preferences [link removed] / Unsubscribe [link removed]

Copyright © 2021 Front Office Sports. All rights reserved.

80 Pine Street Suite 3202 New York, NY 10005