Woke IRS!



[INSIDE JW]

Records Show that Joe Biden Used Email Alias With Hunter and Brother
James

[[link removed]]

Judicial Watch received
[[link removed]
pages
[[link removed]]
of records from the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA) that show then-Vice President Joe Biden using an email alias to
correspond with family members, including son Hunter and brother
James.

These alias emails show Joe Biden and his family had a close working
relationship on government matters. No wonder the Biden administration
had been hiding these emails from Congress and the American people!

Of course, we had to go to court to get these records (_Judicial
Watch, Inc. v. National Archives_
[[link removed]]
(No. 1:23-cv-01432)).

The emails we received also show that Joe Biden signed off on the
cessation of Secret Service protection for Hunter Biden and Beau
Biden’s daughter Natalie during an
[[link removed]
2016
[[link removed]]
trip to Kosovo.

These emails include messages to Jim and Hunter Biden regarding the
then-vice president’s schedule and meetings. Some emails show Biden
using the alias: [email protected].

The emails also show that Hunter and James Biden accompanied Joe Biden
on taxpayer-funded trips. Moreover, they show that then-Vice President
Biden in December 2009 emailing an aide after he forgot the password
to his West Wing computer.

The records show that Hunter Biden used an email address
([email protected]) from his now-dissolved firm Rosemont
Seneca Partners.

The records also show that James Biden used an email address
([email protected]) tied to his consulting firm Lion Hall, which
had been the
[[link removed]
[[link removed]]
of an FBI bribery investigation in the 1990s.

Most of the 210 Biden vice presidential email messages we received
were redacted due to Presidential Records Act (PRA) restrictions and
applicable FOIA exemptions, which specify what material may be
released to the public.

Previously, we released
[[link removed]
pages
[[link removed]]
of records that show
then-Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter received a May 26,
2016, email detailing a scheduled “8:45 am prep for a 9 am phone
call with Pres Poroshenko,” who was the president of Ukraine. Joe
Biden’s email address is the alias [email protected], Hunter
Biden’s email account is disclosed as [email protected].
(Hunter Biden was on the board of the controversial Ukrainian firm
Burisma at the time.)

In an August 18, 2016,
[[link removed]
[[link removed]]
sent
from his Rosemont Seneca email address to Secret Service Assistant
Director of the Office of Investigations Jeremy Sherida, Hunter Biden
writes: “Thank you. Both the Vice President and I sign off on the
agreed upon requested interruption in protection for Natalie and
Hunter.” The interruption in protection was from August 18 to August
22, 2016, during their trip to Kosovo and was to resume up their
return to Washington, D.C., on August 22, 2016. The Biden family was
in Kosovo where the country erected a statue of and named a highway
after Beau Biden. It is not known where Hunter Biden and Natalie Biden
went without their Secret Service detail.

In previous litigation, we found that, for the first five-and-a-half
years of the Obama administration, Hunter Biden
[[link removed]
extensively
[[link removed]]
while receiving a Secret Service protective detail. During the time
period of the records provided in that litigation, Hunter Biden took
411 separate domestic and international flights to 29 foreign
countries. He visited China five times.

In the current batch of records, an
[[link removed]
[[link removed]]
from Michele Smith, executive assistant to the vice president, dated
June 24, 2011, was titled “News piece and wire photos from the first
Greece stop.” The email is addressed to Hunter Biden, Beau Biden,
Hallie Biden, and Kathleen Biden. The email contains two attachments,
which are photos of Jill Biden with U.S. troops on the USS Ramage. The
email is a news release concerning Jill Biden arriving in Greece for
the 2011 Special Olympic Games. Prior to attending the “Flame of
Hope” lighting ceremony, Mrs. Biden visited the USS Ramage, a
destroyer anchored off the Faliro Marina in southern coastal Athens.
Biden told the crew members of the destroyer she was looking forward
to attending the Special Olympic Games.

An
[[link removed]
[[link removed]]
from Michele Smith, dated October 24, 2010, was addressed to James
Biden. The subject of the email is “Tomorrow’s Schedule – safe
travels.” The email is an itinerary for then-Vice President Joe
Biden and James Biden for one-day travel from the VP’s private
residence in Delaware to Orlando, Florida, to address the
International Association of Police Chief’s. On the return trip,
there were short stops at Manchester-Boston Regional Airport for a
dinner visit with Ann McLane Kuster at Norton’s Classic Café
followed by a visit to Salon 263, Nashau, New Hampshire. Afterwards,
Vice President Biden and Jim Biden returned to his private residence.

An
[[link removed]
[[link removed]]
from Fran Person, Vice President Biden’s personal assistant, dated
July 24, 2009, is addressed to Beau Biden and Hunter Biden and is
titled, “Fw. A Very Successful Visit.” Two email recipients are
redacted. The email is a forward from Antony Blinken, deputy assistant
to the president, from Ambassador John Teft regarding Biden’s trip
to Tbilisi, capital of the Republic of Georgia. The email states that
everyone from President Saakashvili to his most ardent opponents had
great things to say about Biden.

An
[[link removed]
[[link removed]]
from Fran Person, dated March 14, 2010, addressed to Hunter Biden is
titled “Tomorrow’s, Monday March 15, Latest Schedule.” Two email
recipients are redacted from the email. The one-day itinerary involves
travel to Cincinnati and Cleveland, Ohio for a meeting with
Congressman Steve Driehaus and attending a small reception for
Democrat Gov. Ted Strickland at a law office.

An
[[link removed]
[[link removed]]
from Michele Smith, dated November 25, 2009, is addressed to a
redacted recipient and CCd to Hunter Biden and Beau Biden and titled
“Follow Up.” The email also has a BCC to Joseph R. Biden, Jr.,
email address redacted. The email is addressed to “Boss” and
concerns a possible visit by Sen. John Kerry to Nantucket over the
holiday weekend and a call to Ambassador Lou Sussman on Thanksgiving
weekend.

An
[[link removed]
[[link removed]]
from Fran Person, dated March 17, 2010, is addressed to Hunter Biden
and an additional, redacted recipient and is titled “Tomorrow’s
Sched Run thru.” The email has a BCC to Kathleen Biden, email
address redacted. The email concerns Hunter traveling with Joe Biden
on a one-day trip to a factory in North Carolina to meet Energy
Secretary Steven Chu to address workers at the Cree factory and to
participate in several media events.

A forwarded
[[link removed]
[[link removed]]
from Fran Person, dated August 19, 2012, is addressed to Joe Biden,
Beau Biden, Hunter Biden, Valerie Biden, and James Biden. There are an
additional two redacted recipients on the email. The email is titled,
“Fw. AP Profile Piece: THE VEEP: A REGULAR AND NOT-SO-REGULAR JOE.

An
[[link removed]
[[link removed]]
from Fran Person, dated May 18, 2012, is addressed to Joe Biden, Beau
Biden, Hunter Biden, Valerie Biden, Ashley Biden; Jill Biden, James
Biden and wife Sarah Biden. There are numerous redacted recipients on
the email. The email is titled “Press Recap” and consists of an
attachment with 13 press releases related to Biden that occurred over
several days.

An
[[link removed]
[[link removed]]
from Fran Person, dated July 31, 2013, is addressed to Beau Biden,
Hunter Biden, and Jill Biden. There are numerous redacted recipients
on the email. The email is titled, “FW: OVP Press Recap
India/Singapore 2013” and consists of an attachment with 203 pages
of press information relating to Biden’s trip to India and
Singapore.

An
[[link removed]
[[link removed]]
from Joe Biden dated October 19, 2010, titled “NY Times: As G.O.P
seeks spending cuts, details are scarce.” The email is addressed to:
Terrell McSweeny, James F. Carney, Jared Bernstein, JACK (redacted),
James Biden, Elizabeth Alexander, Evan M. Ryan, Beau Biden, Hunter
Biden, and several email administrative groups associated with his
staff. The email contains a link to a NY Times article.

An
[[link removed]
[[link removed]]
from Joe Biden dated May 28, 2012, titled “NY Times: West Point is
Divided on a War Doctrine’s Fate / great article. Joe. The email is
addressed to: Ted (Redacted); Thomas E. Donilon, Antony Blinken, Beau
Biden, Hunter Biden, James Biden, Bobbi J. Doorenbos, Bruce N. Reed,
John Martilla, Mike Christopher, and Mike Donilon. The email contains
a link to a NY Times article.

An
[[link removed]
[[link removed]]
from Joe Biden dated December 27, 2012, titled “Interesting.” The
email is addressed to Beau Biden, Hunter Biden, Howard (redacted),
Valerie Biden, Ashley (Redacted); Missy (Redacted); and Michael
Donilon. The email contained a link to a poll taken by CNN regarding
Vice President Biden’s job performance.

An
[[link removed]
[[link removed]]
from Joe Biden dated May 6, 2011, is titled “The Employment
Situation In April.” The email is addressed to Beau Biden, Hunter
Biden, James Biden, Bobbi J., Bruce N. Reed, JACK (redacted), and
Jared Bernstein. The email states, “I thought you would find this
interesting” and provides a link to a whitehouse.gov press release.

An
[[link removed]
[[link removed]]
from Joe Biden dated February 22, 2011, titled “NY Times: Why Cuts
Don’t Bring Prosperity.” The email is addressed to Ted (Redacted),
Thomas E. Donilon, Antony Blinken, Beau Biden, Hunter Biden, James
Biden, Elizabeth Alexander, Allan L. Hoffman, Ted Kaufman, Terrell
McSweeny, Matthew S. Teper, Mike Donilon, Cynthia Hogan, Ron Klain,
Evan M. Ryan, Bruce N. Reed, and Terrell P. McSweeny. The email
provides a link to a NY Times article.

An
[[link removed]
[[link removed]]
from Joe Biden dated January 23, 2011, titled “NY Times: Maybe Japan
Was Just a Warm-Up.” The email is addressed to Beau Biden, Hunter
Biden, James Biden, Jared Bernstein, Jay Carney, Cynthia Hogan, Ted
Kaufmann, Terrell P. McSweeny, Courtney O’Donnell, and Evan M. Ryan.
The email provides a link to a NY Times article.

In a December 6, 2009,
[[link removed]
[[link removed]]
to
Fran Person sent from his alias account [email protected] on
his BlackBerry via AT&T, Joe Biden asks: “What is my password for my
west wing computer.” Person responds by sending the password
[redacted].

We have nearly a dozen FOIA lawsuits regarding records concerning
Biden corruption issues, including:
In March 2023, the Archives
[[link removed]
released
[[link removed]]
only
[[link removed]
pages of over 8,000
[[link removed]]
records about the unprecedented document dispute and raid on the home
of former President Trump.
In October 2022, we
[[link removed]
[[link removed]]
the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS) for all communications between the Secret
Service and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) regarding the search
warrant which precipitated the raid on former President Donald
Trump’s Florida residence at Mar-a-Lago on August 8, 2022.

Also in October 2022, we
[[link removed]
[[link removed]]
the Barack
Obama Presidential Library for Obama White House records about the
2016 “Russia Collusion Hoax.” The records, which by law were not
available under FOIA until five years after President Obama left
office, are held at the library, which is part of the National
Archives system.

We expect more and more documents on Biden family corruption over the
next several months so be sure to watch this space closely for
updates.

BIG TECH, BIG GOVERNMENT, BIG BROTHER: WASHINGTON’S WAR ON FREE
SPEECH

Michah Morrison, our chief investigative reporter, rounds up
[[link removed]]
the
evidence in Judicial Watch’s _Investigative Bulletin_ on the
Left’s “censorship industrial complex”:

> An unprecedented assault on free speech is underway in America. The
> White House and government agencies play central roles. But because
> this new war largely takes place in the shadows of cyberspace,
> unfolding in back offices of social media giants like Facebook,
> YouTube, Google, TikTok and Twitter, the public has been slow to
> catch on to the threat.
>
> In recent months, however, the House Judiciary Committee, the U.S.
> Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and Judicial Watch have each
> issued findings that break new ground. Taken together, they go a
> long way to dragging the war on the First Amendment into the
> sunlight. The main target of the new censorship efforts?
> Conservative speech, speakers, and viewpoints.
>
> “The Weaponization of ‘Disinformation,’” a November report
> of the Judiciary Committee, concludes that the “world’s largest
> social media platforms…intentionally suppressed”
> constitutionally protected speech “as a consequence of the federal
> government’s direct coordination.”
>
> The Fifth Circuit Court agrees. In _State of Missouri v. Biden et
> al_—an eye-opening October ruling that did not get the attention
> it deserved—the Court found that “the White House likely (1)
> coerced [social media] platforms to make their moderation decisions
> by way of intimidating messages and threats of adverse consequences,
> and (2) significantly encouraged the platforms’ decisions by
> commandeering their decision-making processes, both in violation of
> the First Amendment.”
>
> Also in October, Judicial Watch released a groundbreaking four-part
> documentary “Censored and Controlled,” detailing the coordinated
> effort by Big Tech and the government to suppress debate on
> elections, Covid-19 information, and news of the Hunter Biden
> laptop. The documentary details efforts by Big Tech to censor
> content, exposing collusion between the government and social media
> to suppress what Americans can see and hear.
>
> The House report demonstrates, step by step, how the Department of
> Homeland Security worked with other government entities, Stanford
> University, and Big Tech to create an elaborate system to suppress
> speech. These efforts were centered in a group with a name straight
> out of Orwell: the Election Integrity Partnership.
>
> The EIP was a consortium of academics led by Stanford University
> that worked “directly” with Homeland Security and the State
> Department “to monitor and censor American’s online speech,”
> the House report noted. “The EIP’s operation was
> straightforward: ‘external stakeholders,’ including federal
> agencies and organizations funded by the federal government,
> submitted [alleged] misinformation reports directly to the EIP. The
> EIP’s misinformation ‘analysts’ next scoured the internet for
> additional examples for censorship. If the submitted report flagged
> a Facebook post, for example, the EIP analysts searched for similar
> content on Twitter, YouTube, TikTok, Reddit, and other major social
> media platforms. Once all of the offending links were compiled, the
> EIP sent the most significant ones directly to Big Tech with
> _specific _recommendations on how the social media platforms should
> censor the posts….”
>
> The pressure from Big Tech “was largely directed in a way that
> benefitted one side of the political aisle: true information posted
> by Republicans and conservatives was labeled as ‘misinformation’
> while false information posted by Democrats and liberals was largely
> unreported and untouched by the censors.” The EIP targeted
> “candidates and commentators with conservative viewpoints.” The
> report lists the targeted figures, which included Donald Trump, Newt
> Gingrich, Sean Hannity, and Judicial Watch’s own Tom Fitton
>
[[link removed]].
>
> Last week, Judicial Watch sued the Department of Homeland Security
>
[[link removed]]
for failing
> to respond to a Freedom of Information Act request for all its
> records regarding JW and Tom. “Judicial Watch and I have been
> censored again and again by government and Big Tech,” Tom said in
> a statement. “That we had to file a federal lawsuit to get basic
> information about this targeting is another sure sign that [Homeland
> Security’s Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Agency] has been up to
> no good.”
>
> The Fifth Circuit ruling also puts on the record many facts about
> the new censorship efforts. The court ruled in favor of the
> secretaries of state of Missouri and Louisiana and five social media
> users who alleged “that numerous federal officials coerced
> social-media platforms into censoring certain social- media content,
> in violation of the First Amendment.”
>
> The ruling details pressure on Big Tech from the White House, the
> FBI, the Surgeon General’s Office, the Centers for Disease
> Control, and the Department of Homeland Security. Each office, the
> ruling finds, “violated the First Amendment.”
>
> The Court noted, for example, that in one email “a White House
> official told a platform to take a post down ‘ASAP,’ and
> instructed it to ‘keep an eye out for tweets that fall in this
> same genre’ so that they could be removed, too. In another, an
> official told a platform to ‘remove [an] account
> immediately’—he could not ‘stress the degree to which this
> needs to be resolved immediately.’ Often, those requests for
> removal were met.”
>
> The White House stepped up the pressure in 2021, the court noted. It
> “started monitoring the platforms’ moderation activities…. In
> that vein, the officials asked for—and received—frequent updates
> from the platforms. Those updates revealed, however, that the
> platforms’ policies were not clear-cut and did not always lead to
> content being demoted. So, the White House pressed the platforms.
> For example, one White House official demanded more details and data
> on Facebook’s internal policies at least twelve times, including
> to ask what was being done to curtail ‘dubious’ or
> ‘sensational’ content, what ‘interventions’ were being
> taken, what ‘measurable impact’ the platforms’ moderation
> policies had, ‘how much content [was] being demoted,’ and what
> ‘misinformation’ was not being downgraded.”
>
> Judicial Watch has been fighting the freedom of speech battle with
> major lawsuits
>
[[link removed]].
And in
> October, JW premiered “Censored and Controlled,” a four-part
> documentary that takes the viewer deep inside government censorship
> efforts, detailing controversies over free speech suppression on the
> site then known as Twitter, election interference, Covid-19, and the
> Hunter Biden laptop.
>
> Clearly, Big Tech is “censoring content,” Tom Fitton told the
> filmmakers. It is “not following a set of rules but following
> government dictates and their own ideological predilections and
> political biases.”
>
> The war over free speech and Big Tech is sure to grow more heated in
> 2024 with a presidential election, a crisis on the southern border,
> and wars in Ukraine and Israel. The stakes could not be higher.
> We’ll be watching closely.
>
> View the Judicial Watch documentary, _Censored and Controlled_, here
>
[[link removed]].
>
> Read “_The Weaponization of Disinformation_,” Interim Report of
> the House Judiciary Committee, here
>
[[link removed]].
>
> Read United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, _State of
> Missouri et al v. Joseph R. Biden et al_, here
>
[[link removed]].

IRS INVESTIGATORS SUBJECT TO WOKE TRAINING FEATURING BLACK TRANS
PROF., DALAI LAMA

Law enforcement agents at the IRS are being abused and distracted with
outrageous racialist DEI traine, as our _Corruption Chronicles_ blog
exclusively details
[[link removed]].


> Federal agents charged with investigating money laundering, public
> corruption, counterterrorism, and narcotics trafficking at the
> Internal Revenue Service (IRS) were pulled from their critical
> duties to endure woke training that directs them to operate in a
> culturally inclusive environment and speak up for multiple social
> identities. The drills focused on equity, diversity, inclusion and
> justice and instructed agents from the specialized IRS Criminal
> Investigation (IRSCI) unit to question how much they know about
> different cultural norms and mores and challenged them with the
> following inquiries: “Are you prepared adequately to accommodate
> different cultural expectations and practices?” and “Can you
> deliver cultural inclusion behaviorally?” The course’s
> introduction, titled “Cultural Inclusion is About Justice,” was
> provided by a black transgender professor who asserts in an academic
> article that the high impact of “whiteness”
>
[[link removed]
> trans college students.
>
> Judicial Watch obtained and reviewed material from the controversial
> special training presented to IRSCI agents as part of mandatory
> continuing professional education for all staff. A source connected
> to the Washington D.C. field office provided slides from the
> specific presentation in that division, which has dozens of agents
> that investigate crimes throughout the capitol area, including
> Maryland, Virginia, and West Virginia. Federal agents—as well as
> the special agent in charge of the D.C. office—working on
> high-profile probes involving bribery, embezzlement, illegal
> kickbacks and dismantling the country’s major drug and money
> laundering organizations were reluctant to be yanked from their
> important work to participate in the woke training. “They want us
> to consider people’s race,” said a veteran investigator whose
> identity cannot be disclosed. “Criminals don’t discriminate.
> White collar criminals are mostly what IRSCI goes after.” And they
> are a diverse bunch, according to government sources interviewed by
> Judicial Watch.
>
> Nevertheless, in this heated environment of political correctness
> many government agencies are implementing official woke initiatives
> under a Biden executive order
>
[[link removed]]
> to advance racial equity and support for underserved communities
> through the federal government. That includes subjecting government
> workers to similar equity, diversity, inclusion, and justice
> training as well as establishing special programs to help the
> targeted audience. The Department of Justice (DOJ) has formulated a
> strategy to “advance equity for marginalized and underserved
> communities” that, among other things, directs federal prosecutors
> to ignore maximum sentencing under the law to “avoid unwarranted
> disparities.” The Department of Labor has dedicated $260 million
> to promote “equitable access” to government unemployment
> benefits by addressing disparities in the administration and
> delivery of money by race, ethnicity and language proficiency. The
> Treasury Department named its first ever racial equity chief, a
> veteran La Raza official who spent a decade at the nation’s most
> influential open borders group. The list goes on and on.
>
> The IRSCI training is part of that expansive woke agenda. Criminal
> investigators at the nation’s tax agency were taught about
> cross-cultural competence in a section that questioned their
> cultural behaviors, values, biases, preconceived notions, and
> personal limitations. “Do you understand the worldview of your
> culturally different customers/colleagues without negative
> judgements?” one slide asks. “Can you develop relevant and
> sensitive intervention strategies and skills with your culturally
> different customers/colleagues?” Keep in mind these are federal
> law enforcement agents investigating the perpetrators of serious
> crimes, not public relations, or human resources representatives. It
> is difficult to understand how they benefit from this type of
> training, which also featured a “cultural perceptions”
> discussion that covered how Mexicans and Taiwanese describe people
> in the U.S. Answers include rushed, reserved, hard-headed,
> unemotional, independent, and self-indulgent.
>
> A slide focusing on projection bias includes a quote from the Dalai
> Lama, the infamous Buddhist monk and Tibetan spiritual leader who
> recently ignited global outrage after kissing a child on the lips
>
[[link removed]]
>
[[link removed]
> an event in northern India then asking the boy to suck his tongue.
> Adjacent to the Dalai Lama’s banner is a deep quote from a
> diversity, equity and inclusion strategist
>
[[link removed]]
who claims
> to be an expert on cultural, racial, religious, gender, generational
> and sexual orientation. Her message to IRS criminal investigators is
> “I am not culturally different from you. I am culturally different
> like you.” Cultural exclusions are discussed in a slide featuring
> a photo of a black woman who claims wearing her hair naturally was
> the only thing that defined her in the office and another black
> woman who refrains from conversations in the office about famous
> black people to avoid a negative affiliation. A Latina woman says
> that she tries “not to be regularly seen with other Latinx
> employees on staff” to avoid a negative association.

ICE DATA SHOW MAJOR DROP IN ARRESTS, REMOVALS OF CRIMINAL ILLEGAL
IMMIGRANTS

You won’t be surprised to learn that the public safety is being put
at risk by the Biden border invasion. Our _Corruption Chronicles_ blog
has the frightening details
[[link removed]].


> Besides welcoming record amounts of illegal immigrants into the
> United States, the Biden administration further compromises national
> security by arresting and deporting “significantly fewer criminal
> aliens than the Trump administration,” according to government
> records obtained by the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS). In a
> troubling report
>
[[link removed]]
> published this week the nonpartisan research organization analyzes
> Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) criminal data from the
> first three years of the Trump administration and the first three
> years of Biden’s presidency and the results are incredibly
> worrisome. The records were obtained through the federal law known
> as the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and public stats disclosed
> by ICE. The Washington D.C. think tank points out that the
> statistics contradict Biden administration claims that its
> disastrous immigration policies are designed to focus on criminal
> aliens.
>
> In fact, back in the fall of 2021 Department of Homeland (DHS)
> Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas issued a memo
>
[[link removed]]
> saying that new guidelines for the enforcement of civil immigration
> law better focus resources on the apprehension and removal of
> noncitizens who are a threat to national security and public safety.
> Taking a jab at the Trump administration, the beleaguered DHS leader
> asserted that “for the first time, our guidelines will, in the
> pursuit of public safety, require an assessment of the individual
> and take into account the totality of the facts and
> circumstances.” In the document Mayorkas asserts that the majority
> of the more than 11 million undocumented or otherwise removable
> noncitizens in the United States have been contributing members of
> our communities across the country for years. As the administration
> strives to provide them with a path to status, the DHS Secretary
> writes in the directive, it will not work in conflict by spending
> resources seeking to remove those who do not pose a threat and, in
> fact, make our nation stronger.
>
> The new CIS report shows that the Biden administration is flat out
> lying to the American public when it claims it prioritizes arresting
> and deporting criminal aliens who may pose a threat to national
> security or public safety. The group’s researchers examined data
> from fiscal years 2017, 2018 and 2019 then compared it to fiscal
> years 2021, 2022 and 2023 and found that “criminal aliens have
> been top beneficiaries of the Biden administration’s agenda.”
> The study clarifies that a criminal alien is a foreigner who most
> likely entered the U.S. illegally and has a criminal conviction or
> pending criminal charges. Under Biden there has been a 67% decrease
> in deportations of criminal aliens, a 57% reduction in arrests of
> criminal aliens, a 55% decline in immigration-related criminal
> convictions and a 44% decrease in detainer requests issued by
> federal authorities on criminal aliens in the custody of local law
> enforcement agencies nationwide.
>
> The records show that in the first three years under Trump, ICE
> removed 485,930 illegal immigrants with criminal convictions or
> pending criminal charges. By contrast, the agency deported only
> 158,931 aliens with criminal convictions or pending criminal charges
> in the first three years of the Biden administration. In Trump’s
> first three years as president, ICE made 389,237 administrative
> arrests of undocumented aliens with criminal convictions or pending
> criminal charges. In Biden’s first three years ICE only arrested
> 165,650 illegal immigrants with criminal convictions or pending
> criminal charges. In the first three fiscal years under the Trump
> administration, ICE recorded 19,978 immigration-related criminal
> arrests, 18,340 indictments, and 17,784 convictions. In Biden’s
> first three years, ICE registered 7,523 immigration-related criminal
> arrests, 7,529 indictments, and 8,090 convictions.
>
> Detainers for criminal aliens in local custody also dropped
> significantly with 484,990 ICE detainer requests in the first three
> years of Trump’s tenure and 270,127 in Biden’s first three
> years. Offenses committed by the illegal immigrants are broken down
> and include thousands arrested for driving under the influence,
> sexual assault, robbery, homicide, weapons crimes, possession of
> dangerous drugs, kidnapping, larceny, and a multitude of other
> serious crimes. The Biden administration’s policy of arresting
> fewer criminal aliens clearly resulted in fewer deportations of that
> demographic and “increased threat to public safety and national
> security,” CIS writes in its report. “The dramatic decrease in
> removals has also sent a strong message to people overseas that
> unlawful entry into the United States comes with a decreased risk of
> deportation, undoubtedly contributing to the unprecedented mass
> illegal immigration that is occurring under the Biden
> administration,” according to CIS.
>
Until next week,

>



[Contribute]
[[link removed]]


<a
href="[link removed]"
target="_blank"><img
src="[link removed]"
style="width:100%;height:auto;" alt="advertisement"></a>

[32x32x1]
[[link removed]]

[32x32x2]
[[link removed]]

[32x32x3]
[[link removed]]

[32x32x3]
[[link removed]]

Judicial Watch, Inc.
425 3rd St Sw Ste 800
Washington, DC 20024

202.646.5172



© 2017 - 2024, All Rights Reserved
Manage Email Subscriptions
[[link removed]]
|
Unsubscribe
[[link removed]]

View in browser
[[link removed]]