Dear Friend,
The NC State Board of Education is in the process of revising the
standards for health education. Standards are the educational goals
required to be achieved in each course.
This process will impact what your children are or are not
taught in public school sex ed classes for the next
decade.
North Carolina law requires North
Carolina schools to teach abstinence-based sex education. That means
that sex education must teach abstinence until marriage as an expected
standard of behavior. It also must teach the real risks—physical,
emotional and psychological—of engaging in sexual activity outside of
marriage.
The other approach to teaching sex
education, promoted by Planned Parenthood, is called “Comprehensive
Sex Education” which ignores the emotional and psychological
consequences of sexual activity outside of marriage and focuses only
on how to avoid pregnancy and STDs.
When we got the Standards first draft, we discovered that the draft
did not follow the law requiring that sexual abstinence outside of
marriage be taught as an expected standard of behavior. Not only
did the first draft ignore the teaching of sexual abstinence until
marriage as an expected standard of behavior, the first draft
didn't even mention marriage at all! When we caught wind of this, we
contacted you late last year and asked you to submit feedback to the
draft (which, thankfully, many of you did).
While we were assured an upcoming second draft would address our
concerns, the recently released second draft is
no better than the first (and in some cases, worse).
We could use your help
again. It will take about 5
minutes.
We need individuals who are able to submit feedback to this second
draft (we've provided directions below).
The comment period lasts until January 14th. We are calling
on all concerned parents and grandparents to let their voices be heard
to ensure that the Standards ultimately reflect NC law and require the
teaching of abstinence-based sex education.
📗 The survey can be found by
clicking here:
Here are some directions on how you can submit a comment in favor
of parental rights:
-
Fill out your name and information.
-
Complete the initial question by rating them 1-3 (1 being
agree, 3 being disagree)
-
Under the section where it asks for comment,
copy and paste the following:
Standard 7.ICHR.2
- The draft does not comply with N.C.
law’s requirement that
the curriculum teach that the only means of avoiding “other health and emotional problems” is through sexual abstinence until
marriage.
Standard 7.ICHR3, Objective 7.ICHR.3.1 - In violation of the statute,
there is no requirement that the instruction include rates of
infection among pre-teens and teens of each known sexually transmitted
disease and the effects of contracting each sexually transmitted
disease.
Standard 7.ICHR.3, Objective 7.ICHR.3.2
- This language ignores N.C. law that requires that information about the use of
contraceptives or prophylactics shall provide accurate statistical
information on their effectiveness and failure rates for preventing
pregnancy and STDs in actual use and must explain clearly the
difference between risk reduction and risk elimination through
abstinence.
Standard 8.ICHR.2, Objective 8.ICHR.2.2
- Neither the
standard nor this objective requires that the instruction present
reasons for remaining or becoming abstinent. Furthermore, the
language discusses “delay” not
avoidance. “Delay” in
this standard is not defined as “sexual abstinence until marriage.”
Standard 8.ICHR.3, Objective
8.ICHR.3.2 - The objective fails to include the requirement that the
information on failure rates of the contraceptives and information on
the difference between risk reduction and risk avoidance as required
by N.C. law.
Standard 8.ICHR.3, Objective 8.ICHR.3.3
- The
objective does not define “delayed.” It should be defined as abstinence from sexual activity
until marriage. Furthermore, the objectives do not state the
requirement in N.C. law that receipt of information about where to
obtain contraceptives and abortion referral services must be in
accordance with the local board’s policy regarding parental consent.
Standard 9.ICHR.1, Objective 9.ICHR.1.5
- The objective requires a discussion of
consent and maintaining personal boundaries. Within the context of sexuality, teaching about consent is
inconsistent with the statutory requirement of teaching sexual
abstinence outside of marriage as an expected standard of behavior.
The purpose of the statute is to teach children how to avoid risk,
not consent to it.
Standard 9.ICHR.2 - The standard fails to include the
requirements of the statute that any instruction on contraceptives
include failure rates for preventing STDs and pregnancy and the
difference between risk reduction and risk elimination through
abstinence.
Standard 9.ICHR.2, Objective
9.ICHR.2.1 - The draft language violates the statute in several ways:
The objective doesn’t
require the teaching of sexual abstinence until marriage as an
expected standard of behavior. Rather, the objective treats
abstinence as an option rather than an expectation. Furthermore, this language flies in the face of the statute
that requires that the curriculum provide the reasons, skills and
strategies for remaining abstinent or becoming abstinent, not
strategies for engaging in sex.
Standard 9.ICHR.2, Objective
9.ICHR.2.4 - The draft requires that the curriculum identify local
resources for STI screenings and sexual healthcare but ignores the
statutory requirement that the information must be provided to
students in compliance with the local board’s consent policy.
Standard 9.ICHR.2, Objective 9.ICHR2.5
- The draft
requires that the curriculum explain the limitations of condoms in
reducing the risk of STDs but fails to include the statutory
requirement that any instruction on contraceptives include failure
rates for preventing STDs among adolescents and the difference between
risk reduction and risk elimination through
abstinence.
Standard 9.ICHR.3, Objective
9.ICHR.3.3 - The objective requires the curriculum to identify trusted
adults and professional resources to help those who have been sexually
abused to heal physically, mentally and emotionally but does not
include “parents” among the list of “trusted adults.” Nowhere in the entire draft of standards is the statutory
requirement fulfilled that requires the curriculum to provide
opportunities that allow for interaction between the parent or legal
guardian and the student.
That sure is a lot, but it may go a long way in making an impact
about what our kids are taught in schools.
Sincerely,
Tami Fitzgerald, NC Values
|