CfA Urges FEC to Investigate Dean Phillips Campaign and Steve Schmidt for Illegal Coordination
View this email in your browser ([link removed])
** CfA's January 5, 2023 Newsletter
------------------------------------------------------------
With your support, Campaign for Accountability is working to expose corruption and hold the powerful accountable.
** This Week's Updates:
------------------------------------------------------------
CfA Urges FEC to Investigate Steve Schmidt, Dean Phillips Campaign for Illegal Coordination
This week, CfA filed a complaint ([link removed]) with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) calling on the agency to investigate the Dean Phillips’ campaign and allied political strategist Steve Schmidt for violations of the Federal Election Campaign Act, which prohibits substantial coordination between super PACs and candidates. CfA’s complaint points to multiple public statements ([link removed]) made by Schmidt declaring that he was directly advising Phillips on his campaign and had been involved in its design. Phillips, for his part, told a Time Magazine reporter ([link removed]) that Schmidt had called him to suggest he run for president. The two eventually met in person, Phillips recalled: “…we sat at my kitchen table, and in two weeks, we stood up a presidential campaign.” A short
time later, Schmidt decamped to start the Pass the Torch USA PAC, which immediately began running advertisements in support of Phillips.
The rhetoric in Pass the Torch’s ads strongly echoes Phillips’ messaging, which is part of the same strategy that Schmidt appears to have crafted during his stint with the campaign. If the communications by Pass the Torch were created, produced, or distributed after substantial discussions between Schmidt and Phillips, it would constitute a prohibited coordinated communication and a violation of FEC rules.
CfA’s complaint was covered by Axios ([link removed]) , The Hill ([link removed]) , Politico ([link removed]) , and more.
Meta, Harvard, and the Cost of Influence
Last month, CfA’s Tech Transparency Project (TTP) published a of donations made to U.S. academic institutions by both Meta and the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (CZI), a grantmaking organization led by Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg and his wife, Priscilla Chen. Now, TTP Director Katie Paul has appeared ([link removed]) on NPR’s Marketplace Tech to explain how companies like Meta use donations to colleges and universities to further their own interests – a form of influence that’s less obvious than typical lobbying, but that also serves to sway policymakers and shape public discourse.
Here’s an excerpt of Katie’s interview:
NPR’s Lily Jamali: The database ([link removed]) that TTP compiled looks at grants to institutions over the last five years. One of the biggest grants made by the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative was for artificial intelligence research at Harvard. Meta and these other big tech companies have obviously been investing very heavily in AI and then you have, on the other side, researchers trying to understand the technology. I wonder how concerned you are by potential conflicts of interest specifically when it comes to AI.
Katie Paul: With AI right now, there’s a lot of potential for conflict of interest because we’re not just seeing a race when it comes to the development of this technology, but also a race to see who can influence Congress the fastest. As there’s more interest in regulating this kind of technology, particularly generative AI and its potential for disinformation, we see a lot of efforts on the part of major companies to try to influence these pending AI policies before Congress has a chance to catch up on the harms.
Listen to their full conversation, here ([link removed]) .
FTC Takes Aim at Voice Cloning Scams
This week, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced that it has begun accepting submissions for its Voice Cloning Challenge ([link removed]) , which is meant to encourage the development of tools for detecting and preventing voice cloning scams. Lately, this type of fraud has been on the rise ([link removed]) . By scraping data from publicly available videos or audio clips, scammers can use AI programs to mimic a person’s voice and place calls to family members asking for money. In November, the Senate Special Committee on Aging heard testimony ([link removed]) from Gary Schildhorn, an attorney from Philadelphia who received a disturbing call using the voice of his son, Brett. In the call, Brett claimed that he had been arrested for drunk driving, was injured, and needed
money for bail. Schildhorn was quickly bombarded with calls from a fake public defender, who told him to wire money through Bitcoin ATMs. He eventually realized something was wrong, and called his daughter-in-law to check in with Brett, who was safe and hadn’t been in an accident.
Schildhorn’s testimony illustrates several challenges the FTC is seeking to overcome with this design contest: the scammers used untraceable burner phones, and directed their victims to send payments in BitCoin, which could not be retrieved. When he went to law enforcement, they told him his recourse was limited. An ideal solution, according to the FTC’s contest guidelines, would place increased responsibility on “upstream actors” rather than consumers. Until some technical solution or screening tool can be developed, the FTC advises Americans to directly call other family members and verify any urgent requests for cash that are received over the phone.
What We're Reading
The FTC’s robocall crackdown ([link removed])
More student loan servicers face punishment for delayed borrower notices ([link removed])
SBF’s Victory From Behind Bars ([link removed])
** Follow Our Work:
------------------------------------------------------------
We thank you for your continued support. Without people like you, our work would not be possible.
Here is how you can stay involved and help us accomplish our mission:
1. Follow CfA on Threads ([link removed]) and BlueSky ([link removed])
2. Follow the Tech Transparency Project on Threads ([link removed]) and Bluesky ([link removed])
3. Tell your friends and colleagues ([link removed]) about CfA.
4. Send us a tip ([link removed]) .
5. Make a tax-deductible donation ([link removed]) .
Be on the lookout for more updates about our work in the upcoming weeks. Thanks again for signing up to be a part of CfA!
Sincerely,
Michelle Kuppersmith
Executive Director, Campaign for Accountability
============================================================
** Website ([link removed])
Copyright © 2024 Campaign for Accountability, All rights reserved.
You signed up for this list at campaignforaccountability.org
Our mailing address is:
Campaign for Accountability
611 Pennsylvania Ave SE
#337
Washington, District Of Columbia 20003
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]
