Dear John,

I’m Jake Fuss, the Director of Fiscal Studies at the Fraser Institute.

One of the most valuable things we do here is shed light on claims that would often otherwise go unchecked.

In other words, we expose misleading political talking points!

Here is just one example…

After already racking up nearly $950 billion in debt during his tenure Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau’s fall economic update forecasts $271 billion more in total debt by 2027/28 than what was in the spring budget.

Despite this, Prime Minister Trudeau claims his government has “a responsible fiscal track”.

His reasoning? Canada has the lowest net debt-to-GDP ratio among G7 countries.

When you extend the analysis to a broader set of 33 developed countries, Canada’s net debt ranks sixth lowest at 14.6% of GDP.

Sounds good, right? Not so fast…

To calculate net debt, you subtract a government’s financial assets from its total debt, with the implicit assumption that those assets could be used to offset debt.

But here’s the problem: the financial assets used to calculate Canada’s net debt include the Canada and Quebec Pension Plans (CPP and QPP).

Assets in the CPP and QPP are needed to provide pensions for current and future retirees in Canada. Therefore, Canadian governments cannot presumably draw from these assets to offset government debt without compromising the plans’ ability to meet obligations to pensioners!

Put more simply, this calculation doesn’t show how much debt we’re really in.

This is not a problem other countries face.

A better measure of Canada’s indebtedness, compared to other countries, is to compare gross general government debt to GDP.

When comparing Canada’s gross general government debt-to-GDP with the same 33 developed countries, Canada falls to 27th out of 33.

And at 106% of GDP, Canada’s gross debt is also higher than debt levels in Germany and the U.K., meaning Canada doesn’t rank best among G7 countries.

Conclusion: Trudeau’s statement is very misleading. In reality, Canada’s government debt is high relative to other comparable countries.

John, this is just one small example of the clarity we bring to public discourse in Canada.

I’m happy to report that a recent op-ed on this exact topic got widespread coverage in the media. It appeared in 14 newspapers and was viewed by hundreds of thousands of people on social media.

Needless to say – we don’t accept government funding for our research!

If you agree that giving Canadians the facts and numbers they need to hold their politicians accountable is important, I’d like to ask you to please consider making a donation today [[link removed][campaignid]].

Every dollar donated goes towards bringing our work to even more Canadians. (And you get a tax receipt at tax time, too!)

Thank you so much for your support.

Sincerely,

Jake Fuss

Director, Fiscal Studies

The Fraser Institute

STAY UP TO DATE

SUPPORT THE FRASER INSTITUTE

The Fraser Institute has been ranked the #1 think tank in Canada, and the 14th best think tank out of more than 8,200 around the world! We keep Canadians – and decision-makers! – informed.

But we are only as strong as our supporters. We do not accept government grants or payments for research - we depend on individuals like you to continue our good work! We are a charity - your donation entitles you to a generous tax credit at tax time!

Contact Us [[link removed]] Privacy Policy [[link removed]] Unsubscribe [link removed] The Fraser Institute's mission is to improve the quality of life for Canadians, their families and future generations by studying, measuring and broadly communicating the effects of government policies, entrepreneurship and choice on their well-being. Email is one of the best tools we have to accomplish these goals. If you no longer wish to receive e-mail updates from us, click here to unsubscribe [link removed].

Fraser Institute 4th Floor, 1770 Burrard Street Vancouver, BC V6J 3G7