BREAKING: Supreme Shuts It DOWN... / WATCH: Black Chicago Resident Explodes At City Council...

The Supreme Court has rejected Special Counsel Jack Smith's plea for an accelerated review of the case against former President Donald Trump, marking a pivotal moment in the ongoing legal saga as the 2024 Presidential election approaches. Smith filed a motion on December 11, urging the Supreme Court to promptly address the case involving four charges against Trump, including conspiracy to defraud the United States and obstruction of an official proceeding.

The decision not to expedite the review is significant, as the trial, initially scheduled for March 4, 2024, may now face delays, potentially extending beyond the upcoming presidential election. Critics, particularly within Trump's base, have criticized the indictment as politically motivated, contending that the accusations lack solid legal grounds.

Smith's strategy to bypass the appeals court and directly involve the Supreme Court was viewed as assertive. However, the Court's recent decision to deny an expedited review may be interpreted in different ways. It denies Smith the urgency he sought in resolving Trump's legal matters, yet it could be seen as a setback for those pushing for immediate legal action against the former President.

The Supreme Court's refusal to fast-track the case introduces various interpretations. On one hand, it denies Smith the speed he desired in addressing the legal issues around Trump. On the other, it might be perceived as a setback for those advocating swift legal action against the former President.

This development could inadvertently strengthen Trump's legal and political position. If the Supreme Court had expedited the review and ruled in Trump's favor, particularly regarding presidential immunity, it would have been a significant legal triumph for him, especially with the presidential election on the horizon.

The case, revolving around Trump's alleged interference in the 2020 presidential election, has been a source of contention. While the indictment involves serious charges, questions about its legitimacy and political motivations have fueled ongoing debate.

CNN's senior legal analyst, Elie Honig, acknowledged earlier in the week that Smith's attempt to expedite Trump's case aimed to secure a conviction before the 2024 election. Honig highlighted the expedited timeline compared to other cases related to the January 6th riot, emphasizing the complexity of Trump's case and the limited time given for preparation.

WATCH: Black Chicago Resident Explodes At City Council...