From Freedom of the Press Foundation <[email protected]>
Subject Acts of journalism lead to arrests
Date December 21, 2023 8:40 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Media Matters investigation threatens the press

View this email in your browser ([link removed])
Dear friend of press freedom,

If you enjoy reading this newsletter, please consider supporting our work through a donation. A few generous supporters have pledged to match donations, dollar-for-dollar, up to $150,000, to help your gift to ([link removed]) Freedom of the Press Foundation (FPF) go even further. Donate today ([link removed]) through Dec. 31 and double your impact! If someone has forwarded you this newsletter, please subscribe here ([link removed]) .

Atmore News reporter Don Fletcher and publisher Sherry Digmon were arrested for reporting the news in October. They are among at least 12 journalists arrested this year, according to our U.S. Press Freedom Tracker. Escambia County, Alabama Sheriff's Office


** Reporters charged with committing ‘acts of journalism’ in 2023
------------------------------------------------------------

Our U.S. Press Freedom Tracker just released its annual report ([link removed]) on arrests of journalists. At first glance, it might look like good news — the Tracker recorded 12 arrests this year, fewer than last year’s 15 and exponentially fewer than 2020’s 146.

But beneath the surface are some troubling trends, including members of the press being cited for asking public officials questions, or arrested for publishing news and for documenting breaking news in the field. Read the full report ([link removed]) and explore the U.S. Press Freedom Tracker’s full database ([link removed]) to learn more. You can also read about ([link removed]) or listen to ([link removed]) a conversation between Tracker Senior Reporter Stephanie Sugars and FPF’s Director of Advocacy Seth Stern about the report and its implications for press freedom.

Media Matters investigation threatens the press

Billionaire bullies ([link removed]) filing SLAPP lawsuits against reporting they don’t like is, unfortunately, nothing new ([link removed]) . But it’s less common for state officials to add fuel to the anti-free speech fire by retaliating against the same reporting, even if it has nothing to do with them.

That’s what makes the recent legal attacks on Media Matters over its investigation ([link removed]) into the advertising practices of X, formerly known as Twitter, unusual and all the more troubling. Not only has Elon Musk filed a meritless lawsuit ([link removed]) against Media Matters, but conservative attorneys general in two states have opened baseless investigations. We wrote ([link removed]) that the press should take note of these tactics, and of how Media Matters is fighting back. Media Matters is the current target but more traditional news outlets may be next.

UK high court will hear final appeal from Assange, but threat to press freedom remains

The High Court of Justice in the United Kingdom recently granted ([link removed]) WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange a final appeal hearing, to be held in February 2024. If the court doesn’t block Assange’s extradition and he’s returned to the United States, it will kick off a dangerous prosecution that threatens freedom of the press.

The Assange prosecution puts all journalists at risk ([link removed]) , even if you don’t think Assange is one himself ([link removed]) . If he’s convicted under the Espionage Act for obtaining and publishing classified documents, there will be nothing to stop ([link removed]) future prosecutions of journalists for the exact same “crime.”

The Biden administration is all talk when it comes to dead journalists

Last month, we wrote about ([link removed]) how journalists need to ask the Biden administration pointed questions about the record pace of journalist killings in the Israel-Gaza war. The good news is that the press has started to do its part by asking questions. The bad news is that Biden administration officials aren’t doing their part — by answering them in good faith.

Read more here ([link removed]) about the latest example of Biden administration officials dodging questions on holding Israel accountable for journalist killings. The bottom line is this: The administration claims to care deeply about journalists’ freedom to cover the war without being targeted. It says it needs more information to figure out whether Israel, its ally that it continues to finance, is, in fact, targeting journalists. But in the same breath, it says it’s not going to bother seeking that information. In other words, the administration is all talk.

More recent reporting on the deadly situation for journalists covering the war is linked below.

The war in Gaza has been deadly for journalists ([link removed])

Where is the outrage over Israel’s killing of journalists in Gaza? ([link removed])

Israeli police officers beat, injured Anadolu photographer Mustafa Alkharouf in Jerusalem ([link removed])

Schatz, Welch, Van Hollen, Kaine, Booker call on Biden to urge Israeli, Egyptian governments to allow journalists into Gaza, protect free press ([link removed])


** What we’re reading
------------------------------------------------------------

A CBS reporter refusing to reveal her sources could be held in contempt ([link removed]) . Reporter Catherine Herridge may be held in contempt for refusing to reveal her confidential sources, and she may have to pay any fines personally. It’s a perfect example of why we need Congress to pass the PRESS Act ([link removed]) .

After critical series, Cicero town president calls Independiente journalists ‘jerks’ and threatens to ban them from speaking at public meetings ([link removed]) . Chicagoland politician Larry Dominick threatened to ban reporters from speaking at public meetings for not standing during the Pledge of Allegiance. But what could be more unpatriotic than denying journalists their First Amendment rights?

The fence will be tested ([link removed]) . FPF Vice President of Editorial and Tracker Managing Editor Kirstin McCudden predicts that authorities in 2024 will continue testing constitutional safeguards for press freedom, much like the velociraptors in “Jurassic Park” tested the electric fences holding them in. “If the velociraptors taught us anything, it’s to keep throwing yourself at the fence — you never know when the electric grid may be shut off.”
Judge rules Assange visitors may sue CIA for allegedly violating privacy ([link removed]) . A federal judge declined to throw out a suit by four U.S. attorneys and journalists over the CIA’s alleged copying of the contents of their electronic devices while they visited Julian Assange in the Ecuadorian embassy in London. That’s good news. The U.S. government should never be allowed to secretly spy on American journalists without a warrant.


**
Before you go…
------------------------------------------------------------

We’re redesigning our website ([link removed]) and would love to get feedback from you! Can you help us by taking this short, anonymous survey ([link removed]) to help us improve the experience?

TAKE QUESTIONNAIRE ([link removed])

We expect it to take no more than 15 minutes to complete, and there’s nothing you need to prepare ahead of time.
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]

============================================================
Copyright © 2023 Freedom of the Press Foundation, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website.

Our mailing address is:
Freedom of the Press Foundation
49 Flatbush Ave, #1017
Brooklyn, NY 11217
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis