From Dan Albas MP <[email protected]>
Subject EV mandate unrealistic
Date December 20, 2023 11:21 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
This new mandate seems headed in the same direction and will result in wasted tax dollars, and increased provincial-federal conflict

View this email in your browser ([link removed])

This week's media reports have stated, "The end of the road is coming for gas-powered vehicles in Canada." These reports are in response to the latest announcement from the Trudeau Liberal Government regarding electric vehicles.

In summary, the announcement proclaims that starting in 2026, every automobile manufacturer selling gasoline-powered trucks, cars, and SUVs in Canada must have a minimum percentage of all-electric or electric hybrid vehicles.

The percentage for 2026 is 20%, which will increase to 23% the following year. 2028, the figure will increase by 34% and then jump to 43% in 2029. According to Prime Minister Trudeau, the target is 60% in 2030. By 2035, the Trudeau Government demands that 100% of all vehicles sold in Canada meet this standard.

However, there are concerns about the affordability of electric vehicles for some individuals and those living in remote rural areas where there may be other options than electric vehicles. These new rules still need to address these concerns. Additionally, some electrical contractors have raised questions about the high costs of electrical upgrades for older homes with inadequate wiring and service panels.

There is also the concern that many provinces currently lack the necessary electrical capacity to comply with this electric vehicle mandate imposed by the Liberal Government. Furthermore, developing new electrical generating infrastructure will be highly costly, as it must also align with Trudeau's demand for provincial electrical grids to move towards net zero by 2035.

It is important to note that Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has criticized this policy shift, stating that it will disproportionately affect those who can least afford to pay more.

In addition, the Trudeau government has allocated $768 million between 2016 and 2027 to purchase and install nearly 90,000 electric vehicle chargers. However, data shows that fewer than one in five funded charging stations from the first program, which has been operational since 2016, are currently operating.

The second program, launched in 2019, aims to install an additional 33,500 electric vehicle chargers by 2025. Still, only 6,697 of these charging stations are currently operational.

This is another expensive program from Prime Minister Trudeau that diverts tax dollars from other priorities, such as defence and healthcare while increasing our deficit. Eventually, this debt load will have to be repaid with interest.

Even industry players, who have supported other elements of the Trudeau Government's auto policies, have criticized these new federal rules as unrealistic and doomed to fail. Flavio Volpe, President of the Automotive Parts Manufacturers Association, stated on talk radio, "It's not reality-based... 100% is impossible."

One concern that has been overlooked in the conversation so far is that under our constitution, the regulation of private property falls under the jurisdiction of the provinces, not the federal government. For example, British Columbia and Quebec have implemented their mandates regarding electric vehicles.

Instead of collaborating with provinces and industry to develop an achievable harmonized pan-Canadian approach which would acknowledge the technical challenges of electrification, while taking into account the needs of rural and remote communities, the Trudeau Government's unilateral move here may face challenges in court, similar to recent rulings on environmental assessments and the banning of certain plastics.

The courts deemed significant elements of the Trudeau Government's laws unconstitutional in both of those cases.

This new mandate seems headed in the same direction and will result in wasted tax dollars, increased provincial-federal conflict, and undermine business investment due to a lack of certainty, regardless of the outcome.

This week's question is: Do you support Prime Minister Trudeau's unilateral approach to require 100% of every vehicle sold by 2035 to be electric or an electric hybrid? Why or why not?

You can reach me at [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) or call toll-free at 1-800-663-8711.

============================================================
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Instagram ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
** Email (mailto:[email protected])
Dan Albas is the Member of Parliament for the riding of Central Okanagan-Similkameen-Nicola and the Co-Chair of the Standing Joint Committee for the Scrutiny of Regulations. In addition, Dan co-chairs an All-Party Parliamentary Cancer Caucus. Dan's riding includes the communities of Kelowna (specific boundaries), West Kelowna, Peachland, Summerland, Keremeos, Hedley, Princeton, Merritt and Logan Lake.
You can reach Dan by calling 1-800-665-8711 or visit: DanAlbas.com
Our mailing address is:
Dan Albas MP
2562B Main Street
West Kelowna, British Columbia V4T 2N5
Canada

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis