March 13, 2020
Permission to republish original opeds and cartoons granted.
Globalization helped export China’s coronavirus. Never again.
In the current environment,
something not seen in America in living memory, the fear and panic of the
Chinese coronavirus make it near impossible to look ahead. What exactly do we
face? A virus that began in China and was allowed to fester before strong
action was taken has now circled the globe. The impact of cheap, universal
travel for all has exacted its price. There is no place safe. But while
countries and governments work to contain or mitigate the effects of the virus,
something far more dangerous have developed; a fear so deep that it has shaken
the very foundations of our society. Assaults on airplanes. Thieves of medical
supplies, in some instances from Emergency Rooms themselves. Hording of basic
commodities and price gouging. And, of course, the financial meltdown on Wall
Street. These are all results of the virus. And they are more deadly. So, into
this maelstrom, what should be our primary interest? What is the singular
question we must ask ourselves? The globalist cadres, those pale, bloodless
vipers who seek nothing but power and control over people’s lives, harp
endlessly that only international organizations can address the problem. More
globalization they whine. But it was globalization that got into this fix. It
has been the mindless greed of the open borders, open trade zealots who set the
table. It was they and their oh so chic ideas, their post-nation-state
nonsense, their uber urbanism, their raw and open disdain for anything based on
founding American principles that has led us to this place. More of this poison
is not the answer.
Cartoon: Monsters
Panic can cause a lot of
damage, too.
Video: Some tips to keep yourself and families safe from coronavirus from CDC
Go to www.coronavirus.gov for tips of how to
keep your homes clean and the elderly safe.
Market Research Foundation: Young voters are not the only group Biden will cost them
“The Democrat Latino problem has emerged as an unexpected trade-off Democrats
will have to make by nominating Joe Biden. In the last two Democratic
primaries, Biden has emerged the frontrunner, leaving a trail of angry Bernie
supporters threatening to ‘DemExit’ and leave the party. While Democrats were
willing to lose a portion of Bernie’s die-hard supporters to consolidate behind
Biden, they may be losing more than they realized. Bernie held a commanding
lead over Biden with three constituencies Democrats arguably can’t afford to
lose all at once: young Black and white voters, and Latinos of all ages.”
Globalization helped export China’s coronavirus. Never again.
By Bill Wilson
In the current environment, something not seen in America in living memory, the fear and panic of the Chinese coronavirus make it near impossible to look ahead. But while everyone who can is working on the “here and now,” it is vital that we think about how this situation came to be, what we can learn from it, and how the crisis we are now experiencing can be prevented in the future.
First, what exactly do we face? A virus that began in China and was allowed to fester before strong action was taken has now circled the globe. The impact of cheap, universal travel for all has exacted its price. There is no place safe. But while countries and governments work to contain or mitigate the effects of the virus, something far more dangerous have developed; a fear so deep that it has shaken the very foundations of our society.
Assaults on airplanes. Thieves of medical supplies, in some instances from Emergency Rooms themselves. Hording of basic commodities and price gouging. And, of course, the financial meltdown on Wall Street. These are all results of the virus. And they are more deadly.
So, into this maelstrom, what should be our primary interest? What is the singular question we must ask ourselves?
The globalist cadres, those pale, bloodless vipers who seek nothing but power and control over people’s lives, harp endlessly that only international organizations can address the problem. More globalization they whine. But it was globalization that got into this fix. It has been the mindless greed of the open borders, open trade zealots who set the table. It was they and their oh so chic ideas, their post-nation-state nonsense, their uber urbanism, their raw and open disdain for anything based on founding American principles that has led us to this place.
More of this poison is not the answer. And that could be the ray of sunshine to break through the doom and gloom of the moment. What if, what if we take the lessons being learned and began to address the root problems.
Listen to the Wall Street crowd and the “free traders” and you would think that China has a stranglehold on us. They don’t. The total volume of trade — going in both directions – between us and China is $660 billion. But the economy of the U.S. is at or above $20 trillion! China is a mere 3 percent of our economy. We sell approximately $180 billion to them. If all trade stopped tomorrow, we could absorb the lost sales by subsidies and never skip a beat. China, on the other hand, would bleed from every pour.
But, say the globalists, China controls 95 percent of all world antibiotics. What ever will we do if they refuse to sell them to us? Well, of course they will sell them to us or to a third party who then direct them to us. Why? Because they desperately need the money. They cannot feed their own people — that is why they are eating bats, and snakes and monkeys. They cannot afford to not have the money to buy food. But we, on the other hand, have another option—begin immediately to produce our own drugs.
The insanity of the globalist agenda is shown for all its vile treason when you consider just this issue of anti-biotics. To put our nation — our people — in a position where a communist government, a government that has killed millions of their own citizens, can blackmail us is nothing less than criminal stupidity.
We have the financial and technical tools to build this industry from the ground up. It is a matter of national security to do so. So, do it. We can discuss how the government can divest of the industry to American citizens once the crisis is past and the industry up and running.
The same can be said of rare earth refining. If a mass of EPA red-tape has to be eliminated for a while, that is just not a big deal. And when the luddites of the so-called “green movement” act irresponsibly to block the moves, they should be handled with harsh prejudice. The same for water in the San Fernando Valley. The same with a dozen other industries.
The devastating impact of the virus will be with us for a long time. It may end up being the equivalent of 9/11 for the Generation Z youth. But something positive and good can come out it, a return to national sovereignty and an end to the globalist nightmare would be an extremely good reward.
We must say never again.
Bill Wilson is the President of the Market Research Foundation and a former board member and former President of Americans for Limited Government.
Cartoon: Monsters
By A.F. Branco
Click here for a higher level resolution version.
Video: Some tips to keep yourself and families safe from coronavirus from CDC
To view online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DXG5KUbgxzA
ALG Editor’s Note: In the following featured analysis from the Market Research Foundation, divisions in the Democratic coalition could cost Joe Biden the election in November:
Young voters are not the only group Biden will cost them
The Democrat Latino problem has emerged as an unexpected trade-off Democrats will have to make by nominating Joe Biden. In the last two Democratic primaries, Biden has emerged the frontrunner, leaving a trail of angry Bernie supporters threatening to ‘DemExit’ and leave the party. While Democrats were willing to lose a portion of Bernie’s die-hard supporters to consolidate behind Biden, they may be losing more than they realized. Bernie held a commanding lead over Biden with three constituencies Democrats arguably can’t afford to lose all at once: young Black and white voters, and Latinos of all ages.
In this week’s primaries, Biden built on his lead with Black voters, winning 66 percent of Black voters in Michigan, 87 percent in Mississippi, and 72 percent in Missouri. Washington state also voted Tuesday but the share of Black, Latino, and young voters was too small to represent a meaningful sample. However, Sanders continued to dominate with younger voters in Michigan and Missouri.
These consolidations were largely a continuation of last week’s election results. Biden won African American voters in last week’s round of primaries, averaging 58 percent of the Black vote across 12 states including California, Massachusetts, Texas and Virginia. Biden also easily won women and voters over 45. But Bernie maintained a solid grip on younger voters and Hispanics. Bernie cleared last week’s primaries with an average of 60 percent of the 18 to 29-year-old age group to Biden’s meager 17 percent. The 30 to 44-year-old segment liked Biden only marginally better, giving him 23 percent of their vote to Bernie’s 41 percent. Biden’s worst performances among young people were in Vermont, California, and Maine.
More ominous for Democrats is that Biden’s weak numbers among young people included young people color. In Texas, despite easy victories with older Black voters, Biden struggled to secure even a third of Black under thirties while Bernie won 45 percent. Biden also did dismally with young Hispanic voters, winning just 10 percent of under thirties to Bernie’s 66 percent, as shown below.
In fact, Latinos of all age groups presented an unexpected challenge to Biden in the swathe of primaries last week. In five key states with large Hispanic populations including California and Texas, Biden struggled with Hispanics. He averaged just 25 percent of Hispanic voters for the five states to Bernie’s 44 percent, with an absolutely devastating blow in California where he won just 22 percent of Hispanics to Sanders’ 49 percent.
Biden’s average share of under thirties so far is just 17 percent to Sanders’ 60 percent. Even among Black voters, arguably his most loyal following, he only sits at an average of 58 percent to Sanders’ 17 percent. Older Black and white voters appear to have made a calculated choice to consolidate behind Biden under the premise that he can unseat President Trump. The problem with this strategy is Democrats risk isolating voters in a vast age range – age 18 to 44 – including young people of color, and Hispanic voters. Even if the play miraculously works out this election and they manage to push Biden into the White House, they will wreak havoc on relationships they’ve tried to cultivate with younger voters and Hispanics.
Meanwhile, younger voters are leaning away from the Democrat Establishment. The primaries have made one issue crystal clear: the Democrat plan to bank on young voters and Latinos as the GOP becomes the party of irrelevant old white people is backfiring spectacularly. The term ‘demographic destiny’ describes an entirely different outcome for the United States than Democrats predicted, and a Biden vs. Trump face-off is only the beginning.