This Fair Courts E-Lert highlights Chief Justice Roberts’s rebuke to Senator Schumer’s remarks targeting Supreme Court justices, how courts around the country are working to address the spread of coronavirus, and more.
Donate
([link removed])
([link removed])
[FAIR COURTS]
FEDERAL COURTS
Chief Justice Roberts Rebukes Senator Schumer for Remarks Targeting Supreme Court Justices
On March 4, Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-NY) received backlash for his remarks targeting
([link removed])
Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch when speaking at a pro-choice rally in front of the U.S. Supreme Court.
Schumer’s remarks were issued as the justices heard arguments over June Medical Services LLC v. Russo
([link removed])
the Court’s first major abortion case since Kavanaugh and Gorsuch were appointed. He used language that insinuated retaliation if they ruled against abortion rights. Schumer later apologized
([link removed])
for his comments.
Last month, President Trump also accused
([link removed])
Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg of bias, tweeting they “[b]oth should recuse themselves... on all Trump, or Trump related, matters!”
Chief Justice John Roberts issued a rare public rebuke
([link removed])
in response to only Schumer, saying, “Justices know that criticisms comes with the territory, but threatening statements of this sort from the highest levels of government are not only inappropriate, they are dangerous.”
According
([link removed])
to the Brennan Center’s Janna Adelstein and Alicia Bannon, “As the leader of the federal courts, it’s appropriate for the chief justice to play a visible role in defending its integrity. But Roberts’... selective response risks exacerbating public perceptions of partisan bias on the Supreme Court.”
U.S. Courts Implementing Procedures in Response to Coronavirus
Courts across the country are implementing emergency strategies in response to concerns about the spread of coronavirus (COVID-19).
Last month, the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts issued a memo recommending federal courts prepare for the potential use of “social distancing measures,” such as telecommuting and the expansion of more flexible working hours, according to Bloomberg Law
([link removed])
Several federal courts, including the Southern District of New York
([link removed])
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
[link removed]
and the Western District of Washington, have since issued a range
([link removed])
of orders in response to COVID-19. On March 12, the U.S. Supreme Court announced
([link removed])
it will be closed to the public until further notice, but the building will remain open for business.
At the state level, the Boston Herald
([link removed])
reports that judges in Massachusetts are being encouraged to reduce or cancel jury days as part of the state’s efforts to reduce the impact of CVOID-19. Other states, including Vermont
([link removed])
Connecticut
([link removed])
and North Carolina
([link removed])
are also considering, or have begun implementing, precautionary measures to address CVOID-19 in their courts.
Senate Democrats Seeking Information on Former Federalist Society Leader’s Influence on Federal Judicial Nominations
On March 4, six Senate Democrats sent letters
([link removed])
to former Federalist Society vice president Leonard Leo, the Federalist Society, the Justice Department, and the White House seeking documents regarding Leo’s role as an advisor to the Trump administration on federal judicial nominations.
In their letter, the senators expressed concern over possible conflicts of interest related to Leo’s leading role over judicial selection and nominations when he has a financial interest related to that work, noting that “Mr. Leo’s network collected more than $250 million in donations, the sources of which remain unknown and which likely have interests before the federal courts” between 2014 and 2017 alone. The senators also noted that Leo’s role has “raised questions regarding his potential status as a federal employee and compliance with accompanying laws and regulations."
According to Bloomberg Law
([link removed])
Leo, who also served as an advisor on judicial nominations during the George W. Bush administration, recently left the Federalist Society to start a new group, CRC Advisors.
STATE COURTS
Illinois State Supreme Court Race Raises Questions About Judicial Diversity
On March 17, seven candidates will compete to fill the seat of former Justice Charles E. Freeman on the Illinois Supreme Court.
Freeman, who served on the bench for 27 years, was the first Black justice and the only person of color to ever sit on the state’s Supreme Court until the appointment of his successor, Justice P. Scott Neville. Neville, who is also Black, was appointed to the court two years ago to complete Freeman’s term and now faces six challengers, including five appellate judges and one practicing attorney. Of Neville’s challengers, two are Black, one is Latino, and three are white.
Depending on the outcome of the election, Illinois could join the 23 states
([link removed])
across the country that currently have an all-white supreme court bench. Neville, who is the state’s only sitting justice of color, has spoken up
([link removed])
about the importance of judicial diversity. Other candidates, including Appellate Court Judge Cynthia Cobbs and Attorney Daniel Epstein, have also spoken
([link removed])
about the need for judicial diversity.
([link removed])
The Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law is a nonpartisan law and policy institute that works to reform, revitalize – and when necessary defend – our country’s systems of democracy and justice.
Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law
120 Broadway, Suite 1750
New York, NY 10271
T 646 292 8310
F 212 463 7308
[email protected]
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences
[link removed]
Want to stop receiving these emails?
Click here to unsubscribe
[link removed]
([link removed])
([link removed])
([link removed])
([link removed])
