Team, I’m in the mood to talk about something controversial…
So let’s talk about Daylight Savings!
It’s been a year and a half since the Sunshine Protection Act was approved by the Senate, but we’re still no closer to enacting permanent Daylight Savings Time across the nation.
Before we dig into the science on this topic, I want to get a sense of where you stand: Do you support permanent Daylight Savings Time?
My fellow Illinoisans know that a 4:30 PM sunset can be a tough pill to swallow – and our neighbors to the north fare even worse.
But in the interest of balance, here are the arguments for and against the Sunshine Protection Act, which would make Daylight Savings Time permanent – no more changing the clocks twice a year. Read on, and then let me know where you land.
- Supporters of the bill argue that the ‘spring forward’ and ‘fall back’ method we currently use is archaic and offers few advantages. There’s also evidence that the additional hour of light during Daylight Savings Time reduces energy costs, drives economic activity, and improves physical and mental health.
- Opponents say that it’s ultimately unnecessary to enact such a drastic change. The lighter mornings during the ‘fall back’ period support our natural sleeping rhythms, leading to increased alertness during the day, lower rates of car accidents, and improved productivity.
With all that said, should Congress act to pass the Sunshine Protection Act and make Daylight Savings Time permanent? Click the button below to give your response:
Thanks in advance,
Sean Casten
|
