It’s critical for journalists to ask Republican Party leaders and members what they think about Trump’s terrifying language. Email not displaying correctly?
View it in your browser ([link removed]) .
[link removed]
[link removed]


** OPINION
------------------------------------------------------------


** Confronting Trump supporters about Trump’s words
------------------------------------------------------------
Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-La), meets with reporters at the Capitol in Washington on Tuesday. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

This week, one of the big media stories — one I wrote about in Tuesday’s newsletter ([link removed]) — is how news organizations are becoming more bold and responsible when it comes to calling out Donald Trump’s dangerous words. For example, many pointed to Trump’s jaw-dropping Veterans Day speech when he promised to “root out the communists, Marxists, fascists and the radical left thugs that live like vermin within the confines of our country that lie and steal and cheat on elections.”

Places such as The Washington Post noted ([link removed]) how words such as “vermin” echoed dictators such as Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini.

News outlets can continue to call out Trump’s disturbing language and reckless lies — and more are doing so every day in stronger and stronger terms — but does it mean anything if fellow Republicans and Trump supporters continue to support Trump? Or, at the very least, make excuses for his behavior?

The media needs to do an even more vigilant job in questioning Trump’s fellow Republicans and those who actually have influence over the party, its members and its supporters.

On Sunday’s “Meet the Press,” moderator Kristen Welker confronted Republican National Committee chairwoman Ronna McDaniel about Trump’s pledge of vengeance against his enemies should he be elected president in 2024. Welker asked, “Does that essentially make the Republican Party take a stance of ‘the Republican Party stands for revenge?' What do you think of that message?”

McDaniel skirted around the question, telling Welker, “I’m not going to get involved in rhetoric that’s happening during a contested campaign for our presidential nominee.”

Pressed further about Trump’s Veterans Day speech, McDaniel said, “Again, I am not going to comment on candidates and their campaign messaging. I will say this, I know President Trump supports the veterans, our whole party supports our veterans. And I do think we’re at a very serious moment in our country.”

An irresponsible answer to a responsible question.

Then, take Tuesday. New Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, currently one of the most powerful members of the Republican Party, was grilled on CNBC’s “Squawk Box” about Trump’s continued denials that he lost the 2020 presidential election. When asked about it by co-host Joe Kernen, Johnson — disappointingly, but not surprisingly — defended Trump.

Kernen asked, “If he did know that he lost the election, was trying to say, then that’s a dangerous precedent to return someone to office that wasn’t going to leave office, even if he knew for a fact that he had. So I guess you would argue that he really believed at that point, and maybe he still believes that he won the election?”

Johnson responded by saying, “I take him at his word. I do believe that he believes that. Remember, I was one of his lawyers. I worked on the impeachment defense team twice in the House to defend his positions. And I know how he thinks. And he’s convinced that because of all the irregularities and everything else, that he was still entitled to that.”

When pressed even further by “Squawk Box” co-host Andrew Ross Sorkin, Johnson said, “Listen, there are a lot of people in Washington who’s saying things that are not accurate all the time. Everybody does. We’re all human. But I’ll say this about President Trump with regard to that election, and what he believes about that, that is deep in his heart. I mean, I’ve talked to him personally about it. Many of us have. And over the years, you’ve heard him say repeatedly over and over the same refrain that he just felt like he was cheated in that election. And I think that’s a core conviction of his. And when I say we should take him at his word on that, he believes it.”

That led media journalist and former CNN host Brian Stelter to tweet ([link removed]) , “This is how the NETWORK OF LIES operates – all feelings, no facts.” (Stelter’s latest book about Fox News and Donald Trump — “Network of Lies” ([link removed]) — came out Tuesday.)

As much as it’s critical to call out Trump’s terrifying language, which conjures up the likes of Hitler, it’s just as critical for journalists to ask Republican Party leaders and members what they think about it.

The media calling out Trump can be, at times, a bit performative — as if they are talking in their own media echo chamber. News media blast away at Trump’s words not only because they are harmful, but to show other media that they’re doing the right thing. And media observers like yours truly praise those outlets for doing the right thing.

That’s not to say the media shouldn’t keep doing it. Quite the opposite. They should hammer home the dangers Trump presents. But you have to also wonder if the audiences many media outlets are talking to aren’t already on board with the idea that Trump poses a great threat.

That’s why it’s important to have moments like Welker asking hard questions of the RNC chairwoman and CNBC asking hard questions of the speaker of the House.

It’s also important to call out the hypocrisy of some politicians and their willingness to move the goalposts.

For example, during that interview on “Squawk Box,” Johnson said, “I'm all in for President Trump. I expect he’ll be our nominee. He's going to win it and we have to make (President Joe) Biden a one-term president.”

Yet The New York Times’ Annie Karni and Steve Eder noted ([link removed]) that in 2015, Johnson wrote a lengthy Facebook post that said, “The thing about Donald Trump is that he lacks the character and the moral center we desperately need again in the White House.”

When challenged by a reader of the post defending Trump, Johnson wrote, “I am afraid he would break more things than he fixes. He is a hot head by nature, and that is a dangerous trait to have in a Commander in Chief.” He added, “I just don’t think he has the demeanor to be President.”

When asked about this by the Times, Johnson said, “During his 2016 campaign, President Trump quickly won me and millions of my fellow Republicans over. When I got to know him personally shortly after we both arrived in Washington in 2017, I grew to appreciate the person that he is and the qualities about him that made him the extraordinary president that he was.”

Johnson added, “Since we met, we have always had a very good and friendly relationship. The president and I enjoy working together, and I look forward to doing so again when he returns to the White House.”

While Johnson’s answers were disappointing, good for the Times for at least asking.

(Hat tip to Mediaite’s Joe DePaolo for collecting the quotes ([link removed]) of Johnson’s interview on CNBC.)


** Exchange of the day
------------------------------------------------------------

More than a dozen times, former UK Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn was asked on TV by British talk show host Piers Morgan if Hamas was a terrorist group. Corbyn never said yes or no. The New York Post’s David Propper has the story ([link removed]) , which includes video of the contentious on-air exchange between Morgan and Corbyn.

I’m typically not a fan of Morgan overall, but he is excellent here in continually pressing Corbyn to give a direct answer to a direct and important question.


** Actually …
------------------------------------------------------------
California Republican Congressman Kevin McCarthy, shown here last month. (AP Photo/Stephanie Scarbrough)

The Corbyn-Morgan exchange might not have even been the second most heated exchange of the day.

What in the world was going on in Washington on Tuesday?

First, NPR’s Claudia Grisales tweeted out ([link removed]) that she was interviewing Tennessee Republican Congressman Tim Burchett when fellow Republican Kevin McCarthy, the former House speaker from California, walked by. Grisales said McCarthy “shoved” Burchett. Later, in an astonishing interview with CNN’s Manu Raju, Burchett said McCarthy “elbowed” him.

In the interview with CNN ([link removed]) , Burchett called McCarthy a “bully,” adding, “He's like the guy who throws a rock over the fence when he's a kid and runs home and hides behind his momma's skirt.”

Burchett claimed McCarthy was “bitter” because Burchett voted to oust McCarthy as speaker of the House.

Meanwhile, McCarthy later told CNN. “I didn’t shove or elbow him. It’s a tight hallway.” And then later, to a group of reporters, McCarthy said, “If I hit somebody, they would know it. If I kidney punched someone, they would be on the ground.”

CNN analyst and former Obama adviser David Axelrod tweeted ([link removed]) , “Seriously, what the hell is this? It's not high school. It's the U.S. Congress.”

We’re not done. There was then this remarkable scene ([link removed]) on Tuesday: At a Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee hearing, Republican Sen. Markwayne Mullin of Oklahoma and the president of the Teamsters union, Sean O'Brien, both stood up and acted like they wanted to fight one another.

I’m not making this up. This is what they said:

Mullin: “You want to run your mouth? We can be two consenting adults. We can finish it here.”

O’Brien: “OK, that’s fine, perfect.”

Mullin: “You want to do it now?”

O’Brien: “I’d love to do it right now.”

Mullin: “Then stand your butt up then.”

O’Brien: “You stand your butt up.”

They both stood and that’s when Sen. Bernie Sanders, the independent from Vermont, seemed almost incredulous, telling Mullin, “Stop it! No, no, sit down! You know, you’re a United States senator.”

Sanders’ admonishment reminded me of the classic line from the movie ([link removed]) , “Dr. Stranglove”: “Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room!”

CBS News’ Ed O’Keefe thought of another film, saying on air ([link removed]) , “We might just need to start calling Capitol Hill ‘Fight Club.’”


** Speaking of which …
------------------------------------------------------------

CNN’s Jake Tapper with excellent work calling out O’Brien for his role in the silly dustup with Mullin. Tapper had O’Brien on Tuesday’s “The Lead” where he asked O’Brien about what happened.

O’Brien said of Mullin, “… what went through my mind was, you're one of 100 of the most powerful people in the country, and you're acting like a 12-year-old in a schoolyard because you didn't get your way.”

But Tapper fired back, “OK, but can I say, you’re tweeting like a 12-year-old. I mean, your tweets were — you’re not a United States senator, OK? And I get that your tweeting is not the same thing as calling somebody out during a Senate hearing. But: ‘You know where to find me. Any place, anytime cowboy.’ You’re making fun of him for not being the tallest senator. I mean, you represent 1.3 million workers. … Do you really think that that is best serving, best representing the members of the Teamsters union?”

O’Brien answered, “His story is compelling, but inaccurate. And in a hearing in March, he started the whole thing by coming into a hearing, looking at us and basically saying to me, ‘I’m not afraid of physical confrontation. As a matter of fact, I welcome it.’ So that’s what perpetuated the whole incident. Never knew the man in my life, never met him. I was testifying in my first Senate hearing, and that was his first introduction to me.”


** Welker’s month
------------------------------------------------------------
NBC News’ Kristen Welker. (Courtesy: NBC News)

It has been quite the month so far for NBC News’ Kristen Welker.

On Nov 5, she did a newsworthy interview with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Three days later, on Nov. 8, she was one of the moderators for the third Republican presidential debate. This past Sunday on “Meet the Press,” Welker had a lengthy, pull-no-punches interview with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

It also should be noted that this past Sunday’s “Meet the Press” drew 4.7 million views across all its platforms. That was a nearly 50% increase over the week prior. The average viewership of 2.415 million viewers made it the most-watched Sunday news show of the week. (But to note: “Face the Nation’s” TV numbers come from its first half hour because not all affiliates carry the second half of the show.)


** Media tidbits
------------------------------------------------------------
* The Washington Post’s Drew Harwell with “Trump’s Truth Social faces ‘substantial doubt’ following financial losses.” ([link removed])
* This Saturday, CNN’s Anderson Cooper will receive the Poynter Medal for Lifetime Achievement in Journalism. He will receive his medal at Poynter’s annual Bowtie Ball. Ahead of the big night, Poynter’s Amaris Castillo writes, “5 of Anderson Cooper’s most memorable on-air moments.” ([link removed])
* My Poynter colleague, Angela Fu, with “Former Gannett Media president Maribel Perez Wadsworth to lead Knight Foundation.” ([link removed])
* The Wall Street Journal’s Alexandra Bruell with “Insider Co-Founder Henry Blodget Steps Down as CEO Amid Strategy Shift.” ([link removed])
* The Washington Post’s Michael Scherer and Josh Dawsey with “Univision, the Spanish language news giant, shifts its approach to Trump.” ([link removed])
* The third Republican primary debate last week on NBC drew 7.5 million viewers — a 21% decline from the second GOP debate in September and a 41% decline from the first GOP debate in August. The first two debates were on Fox News and Fox Business.
* Enock Nyariki, community and impact manager of the International Fact-Checking Network at Poynter, with “South Korea’s fact-checking future is uncertain as a key donor retreats.” ([link removed])


** Hot type
------------------------------------------------------------

In 2022, Stanford University star soccer goalkeeper Katie Meyer died by suicide. Sports Illustrated’s Greg Bishop writes, “Did Stanford Fail Katie Meyer?” ([link removed])


** More resources for journalists
------------------------------------------------------------
* Subscribe ([link removed]) to Poynter’s Friday newsletter, Open Tabs ([link removed]) with Poynter managing editor Ren LaForme, and get behind-the-scenes stories only available to subscribers.
* How Any Journalist Can Earn Trust (Self-directed course) — Enroll now ([link removed]) .
* Got a story you’d like to write for Poynter? Email [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) with your idea, approximate timeline and word count.

Have feedback or a tip? Email Poynter senior media writer Tom Jones at [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) .
[link removed]
I want more analysis of the news media to help me understand my world. ([link removed])
GIVE NOW ([link removed])

ADVERTISE ([link removed]) // DONATE ([link removed]) // LEARN ([link removed]) // JOBS ([link removed])
Did someone forward you this email? Sign up here. ([link removed])
[link removed] [link removed] [link removed] [link removed] mailto:[email protected]?subject=Feedback%20for%20Poynter
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
© All rights reserved Poynter Institute 2023
801 Third Street South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701
If you don't want to receive email updates from Poynter, we understand.
You can change your subscription preferences ([link removed]) or unsubscribe from all Poynter emails ([link removed]) .