Bonta files lawsuit against oil and gas companies for "misleading" the public about climate change

View this email in your browser ([link removed])


** California AG Sues Big Oil
------------------------------------------------------------

Dear John,

California Attorney General Rob Bonta filed a lawsuit ([link removed]) last month against oil and gas companies for "misleading" the public about climate change. But there's an inherent and fatal flaw in his case. You can’t lie when you’re telling the truth. And the truth is as explicit as it is heretical: The theory that fossil fuel creates an immediate and existential threat in terms of “climate change and extreme weather” is a theory. It is not “settled science,” and it never was.

Millions of people doubt the climate crisis narrative, and the fact that nearly all of them are afraid to say so testifies to the campaign of intimidation, censorship, brainwashing, and litigation that is condoned and often coordinated by one of the most powerful and pernicious coalitions of special interests in the history of the world. Publicly challenging the “consensus” often spells career and corporate suicide. And that, too, ought to be obvious.

The policies being put in place to supposedly mitigate the impact of CO2 and other “greenhouse gasses” are enabling a massive transfer of wealth and centralization of public and corporate power. By micromanaging energy use via “climate action plans” and “carbon accounting,” literally every human activity becomes highly regulated and more expensive. This reduces the middle class to subsistence, drives small and mid-sized companies out of business, allows monopolistic companies to consolidate entire industries, and expands the size and reach of government to grotesque proportions.

It erases liberties taken for granted in America for over two centuries, including unrestricted mobility and a reasonable chance to afford a home.

Thanks to environmentalists pressuring the state into imposing ridiculous “net zero” building codes, along with cordoning off cities to prevent the far less expensive option of building on open land, the average home in California costs over $728,000. Add to that the most expensive total costs for natural gas ([link removed]) , electricity ([link removed]) , gasoline ([link removed]) , and water ([link removed]) in the United States, and the average Californian is lucky to have anything left over for clothing, groceries, or health care.

All of these costs are elevated either indirectly or explicitly thanks to environmentalist regulatory excess. The state has plenty of land for homes, trees for lumber, abundant reserves of gas and oil, and amazingly productive farmland. But in every one of these areas —the foundations of prosperity— environmentalist-inspired rules have restricted supply and raised costs.

Bonta, for all his self-righteousness and phony demeanor, is not stupid. He understands the consequences of what he’s doing. But Bonta is a puppet. He is owned by public-sector unions, California’s most powerful special interest, and nothing will expand unionized government more than climate mitigation — more regulations meant to cope with the “climate crisis” means bureaucracy, more agencies, more fees, and more taxes.

In Bonta’s run for attorney general in 2022, he collected the maximum permissible contribution ([link removed]) , $16,200, from 33 entities ([link removed]) . Every one of them was a union-funded small-contributor committee. Every single one. Of his largest contributors, the first 52 were unions, nearly all of them public-sector unions.

Public-sector unions’ control of Bonta is reflected in his actions as attorney general. Does he use the power of his office to make a dent in rampant crime in California counties where district attorneys won’t prosecute criminals? Does he investigate the corruption that drives a homeless industrial complex ([link removed]) of public bureaucrats, “nonprofits,” and politically connected developers who have snarfed their way through over $20 billion in taxpayer money in just the last four years ([link removed]) , with billions more on the way? Has Bonta supported repeal of Prop. 47, which downgraded property and drug crimes in California?

No. Because if the answer to any of those questions were yes, Bonta would be defying the agenda of unionized government and their quasi-private-sector cronies.

Which brings us back to Bonta’s case against Exxon Mobil, Shell, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, and BP. Let’s not kid ourselves here. This is extortion. It might be perfectly legal, but it is extortion, following what is becoming a well-traveled path of “climate change litigation.” Sadly, the oil companies will probably refrain from fighting this as aggressively as they ought.

Fossil fuel is not playing a decisive role in affecting climate, the climate is not rapidly changing ([link removed]) in ways to which we cannot readily adapt ([link removed]) , gradual warming will probably cause on balance more good than harm, fossil fuel has done far more to uplift humanity ([link removed]) than to harm humanity —including generating the wealth we’ve needed to protect the environment from genuine pollution— and, even today, we are still nowhere near ready to replace fossil fuel with new energy technologies.

Why doesn’t Rob Bonta sue the five biggest environmental advocacy groups in California for their public misinformation campaigns, political lobbying and litigation ([link removed]) that demonized loggers, ranchers, and private property owners, preventing them from performing the logging, grazing, mechanical thinning, and controlled burns that up until the 1990s kept California’s forests from becoming dangerously overgrown?

Why doesn’t Bonta, along with Gov. Gavin Newsom, publicly acknowledge that environmentalist pressure groups regulated sensible forest management out of existence in California, that a century of fire suppression, along with two or three decades of management neglect, have left tree density in California’s forests at five to 10 times what is historically normal ([link removed]) , and that is the reason they’re dried out, unhealthy, and burn like hell?

Bonta told a fawning PBS interviewer on Sept. 20 ([link removed]) that if the fossil fuel companies had been, according to him, paragons of honesty back in the 1950s, “choices would have been different, like doubling down and investing on clean energy and phasing out of fossil fuel.” This is absurd. Even now, the materials science that may someday result in sustainable, affordable, practical batteries for EVs is still in its infancy.

Bonta is posturing. He might be forgiven for believing the alleged consensus ([link removed]) on climate change, simply because everyone he’s surrounded himself with, including all his donors, are telling him the same story. But Bonta cannot be excused for his blithe indifference to the benefit of fossil fuel, the wealth and broadly distributed prosperity it has given people everywhere, the fact that it still provides more than 80 percent of global energy, the complete lack of scalable alternatives to fossil fuel in past decades, and the extraordinary technological challenges we still face to successfully replace it.

Rob Bonta needs to go back to prosecuting criminals. And if he wants to courageously face down opportunistic dishonesty and deception, perhaps he should look in the mirror.

— by Edward Ring, senior fellow with California Policy Center. A longer version of this article originally appeared in The American Spectator. ([link removed])
SUPPORT CPC ([link removed])
New Podcast ()
[link removed]


** Radio Free California #302: Newsom Raises the Red Lantern
------------------------------------------------------------
On this week's podcast with CPC president Will Swaim and CPC board member David Bahnsen: Gov. Gavin Newsom travels to China. Rep.Tom McClintock unleashes a parody bomb on the House that Gaetz unbuilt. U.S. Senator Laphonza Butler’s former employer still hasn’t returned Sam Bankman-Fried’s dirty money. And, San Francisco mayor London Breed asks the “conservative Supreme Court” to help solve her city’s homeless crisis. Listen now. ([link removed])

More from CPC ()


** Define the Business of Local Government — and Mind It
------------------------------------------------------------

There's a growing trend among cities to take on national, even global, issues that are expected to be addressed at the national government level. CPC senior fellow Mark Moses explains why local governments should avoid mission creep that hinders effective government, and instead reaffirm their fundamental roles and responsibilities. Read the article. ([link removed])


** ICYMI: The Disastrous Insurance Landscape in California
------------------------------------------------------------

CPC received a lot of responses to the article featured in last week's newsletter about why insurers are abandoning California and leaving scores of homeowners without coverage. If you haven't had a chance to read it yet, don't miss this important piece by CPC Research Manager Sheridan Swanson on the policy-failure-trifecta responsible for the crisis. Read now. ([link removed])

============================================================

ABOUT THE CALIFORNIA POLICY CENTER

The California Policy Center promotes prosperity for all Californians through limited government and individual liberty.

Learn more at ** CaliforniaPolicyCenter.org ([link removed])
.
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Instagram ([link removed])
Copyright © 2023 California Policy Center, All rights reserved.
We send periodic updates to those who opted in on californiapolicycenter.org

Our mailing address is:
California Policy Center
18002 Irvine Blvd Ste 108
Tustin, CA 92780-3321
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]