[link removed]

FAIR
View article on FAIR's website ([link removed])
Australians Call to End Long Persecution of WikiLeaks' Julian Assange Robin Andersen ([link removed])


Sydney Morning Herald: The time has come to end the sorry Julian Assange saga

Sydney Morning Herald (5/12/23 ([link removed]) ): "The time has come to end this sorry saga."

As WikiLeaks founder and Australian citizen Julian Assange ([link removed]) has nearly exhausted his appeals to British courts against a US extradition order, Australia has ramped up its advocacy on his behalf. Six Australian MPs held a press conference outside the US Department of Justice on September 20 to urge the Biden administration to halt its pursuit of Assange (Consortium News, 9/20/23 ([link removed]) ).

They came representing an impressive national consensus: Almost 80% of Australian citizens, and a cross-party coalition in Australia’s Parliament, support the campaign to free Assange (Sydney Morning Herald, 5/12/23 ([link removed]) ). Opposition leader Peter Dutton joined ([link removed]) Prime Minister Anthony Albanese in urging Assange's release.

The day before, an open letter ([link removed]) to the Biden administration signed by 64 Australian parliamentarians appeared as a full-page ad in the Washington Post. It called the prosecution of Assange "a political decision" and warned that, if Assange is extradited, “there will be a sharp and sustained outcry ([link removed]) ” from Australians.

Given what is at stake for freedom of the press in the Assange case, and the intensified pressure from Australia—a country being wooed to actively enlist in the US campaign against China by spending $368 billion ([link removed]) on nuclear submarines and supersonic missiles (Sydney Morning Herald, 8/10/23 ([link removed]) )—we ought to expect coverage from the Washington Post, New York Times and major broadcast networks. But coverage of the press conference was virtually absent from US corporate media.


** Prosecuting publishing
------------------------------------------------------------

The US has been seeking to extradite Assange from Britain on charges relating to the leaking of hundreds of thousands of documents to international media in 2010 and 2011, many of which detailed US atrocities ([link removed]) carried out in the Afghanistan and Iraq wars and other human rights violations, such as the torture of detainees at Guantánamo Bay (Abby Martin, 3/10/23 ([link removed]) ).

In 2019, President Donald Trump's administration brought Espionage Act charges against Assange for obtaining and publishing leaked documents, a dramatic new attack on press freedom (FAIR.org, 8/13/22 ([link removed]) ). Assange could face 175 years in a supermax prison if convicted under the Espionage Act, “a relic of the First World War” meant for spies (American Constitution Society, 9/10/21 ([link removed]) ), and not intended to criminalize leaks ([link removed]) to or publications by the press. The Biden administration has rolled back much of the legal mechanism used by Trump to attack journalists, but President Joe Biden has reaffirmed the call to extradite ([link removed]) Assange.
NYT: Leaked Cables Offer Raw Look at U.S. Diplomacy

The New York Times (11/28/10 ([link removed]) ) published articles based on WikiLeaks' revelations, but pays little attention to Julian Assange's persecution.

Assange also coordinated with international news outlets to publish other material known as Cablegate ([link removed]) about the “inner-workings of bargaining, diplomacy and threat-making around the world” (Intercept, 8/14/23 ([link removed]) ). Indeed, the New York Times (e.g., 11/28/10 ([link removed]) ) published many articles based on the WikiLeaks documents, which had been sent to Assange by US army whistleblower Chelsea Manning.

US officials have repeatedly justified their case by charging that Assange put lives at risk; to date, no evidence has surfaced that any individuals were harmed by the leaks (BBC, 12/1/10 ([link removed]) ; Chelsea Manning, Readme.txt, 2022 ([link removed]) ). As the Columbia Journalism Review (12/23/20 ([link removed]) ) admonished, don’t let the Justice Department’s

misdirection around "blown informants" fool you—this case is nothing less than the first time in American history that the US government has sought to prosecute the act of publishing state secrets, something that national security reporters do with some regularity.

In failing health after suffering a stroke, Assange has been held in London’s high-security Belmarsh Prison since he was removed from the Ecuadorian Embassy in April 2019. He had sought asylum at the embassy in London in 2012 to avoid being sent to Sweden for questioning over sexual assault allegations ([link removed]) , because Sweden would not provide assurances it would protect him from extradition to the US. Sweden dropped charges against Assange in November 2019 (BBC, 11/19/19 ([link removed]) ), after he was in British custody.


** International condemnation
------------------------------------------------------------
Messenger: Brazil Calls for Release of WikiLeaks leader

Brazilian President Lula da Silva (9/19/23 ([link removed]) ): "A journalist like Julian Assange cannot be punished [for] informing society in a transparent and legitimate way."

The Australian diplomatic mission coincided with the convening of the UN General Assembly in New York City, where President Lula da Silva of Brazil condemned the prosecution of Assange, offering yet another opportunity for US corporate media to cover the strong international opposition to Assange's treatment.

A video (9/19/23 ([link removed]) ) of Lula speaking at the opening of the UN General Assembly was widely circulated on social media. "Preserving press freedom is essential," Lula declared. "A journalist like Julian Assange cannot be punished for informing society in a transparent and legitimate way."

Former British ambassador Craig Murray commented about Lula’s reception at the UN (Twitter, 9/17/23 ([link removed]) ):

It is really not normal for the hall at the UN General Assembly to break into this kind of spontaneous applause. The US has been losing the room internationally for a decade. The appalling treatment of Julian is a focus for that.


** US media absence
------------------------------------------------------------

Yet, with a few exceptions (Fox News, 9/20/23 ([link removed]) ; The Hill, 9/21/23 ([link removed]) ; Yahoo News, 9/21/23 ([link removed]) ), none of this made the major US news outlets.
Business Insider: Joe Biden has a decision to make about Julian Assange

Business Insider (10/1/23 ([link removed]) ): "The Assange issue is expected to be on the table during Albanese's upcoming four-day visit to the US, which includes a state dinner hosted by President Joe Biden on October 25."

Over a week later, Business Insider (10/1/23 ([link removed]) ) ran a long piece that featured an interview with Gabriel Shipton, Assange’s half-brother. It pointed out that Assange had become an obstacle to US plans to involve Australia in its aggression toward China, quoting the PM. But the piece also hashed through a number of long-debunked claims, including one that reminded readers that Mike Pompeo once called Assange “a fugitive Russian asset” (FAIR.org, 12/03/18 ([link removed]) ; Sheerpost 2/25/23 ([link removed]) ), and another that repeated US assertions that WikiLeaks releases would put the US at risk.

The New York Times has been conspicuously absent from the coverage of Assange. Though the Times signed a joint open letter (11/28/22 ([link removed]) ) with four other international newspapers that had worked with Assange and WikiLeaks, appealing to the DoJ to drop its charges, the paper has remained almost entirely silent on both Assange and the issues raised by his continued prosecution since then.

As FAIR pointed out, during the Assange extradition hearing in London, the Times

published only two bland news articles (9/7/20 ([link removed]) , 9/16/20 ([link removed]) )—one of them purely about the technical difficulties in the courtroom—along with a short rehosted AP video (9/7/20 ([link removed]) ).

There were no editorials on what the case meant for journalism. FAIR contributor Alan MacLeod noted that the Times seemed to distance itself from Assange and WikiLeaks, and its own reporting on the Cablegate scandal ([link removed]) , coverage that boosted the papers’ international reputation.

Other opportunities for coverage have been missed by the Times. For instance, Rep. Rashida Tlaib wrote a letter (4/11/23 ([link removed]) ), signed by six other members of the Progressive Caucus, calling for the DoJ to drop the charges against Assange. Tlaib cited support from the ACLU, Amnesty International, Reporters Without Borders, the Committee to Protect Journalists, Defending Rights & Dissent and Human Rights Watch, and many others, stating that his prosecution “could effectively criminalize” many “common journalistic practices.” The letter was covered by The Nation (4/14/23 ([link removed]) ), the Intercept (3/30/23 ([link removed]) ), Fox News (4/1/23
([link removed]) ), The Hill (4/11/23 ([link removed]) ) and Politico (4/11/23 ([link removed]) ), but the Times and other major newspapers were conspicuously silent.

When Assange lost his most recent appeal against extradition in June, a few outlets reported the news online (e.g., AP, 6/9/23 ([link removed]) ; CNN, 6/9/23 ([link removed]) ), but not a single US newspaper report could be found in the Nexis news database. (Newsweek's headline framed the news as a "headache for Biden"—6/8/23 ([link removed]) —rather than a blow for press freedom.) The Times only vaguely referred to the news (Assange "keeps losing appeals") two weeks later in a feature (6/18/23 ([link removed]) ) on the late whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg ([link removed]) , who had criticized Biden's decision not
to drop the case against Assange.


** The world is watching
------------------------------------------------------------
Common Dreams: 64​ Australian Parliamentarians Endorse Diplomatic Trip to Free Assange

Australian Greens Sen. David Shoebridge (Common Dreams, 9/19/23 ([link removed]) ) on Julian Assange: "The core crime he faces is the crime of being a journalist."

A huge collective breath is being held as the world watches to see what will happen to Assange, the most famous publisher on the globe. Will he be returned to his country and his family by Christmas, as the Australian MPs have requested? Or will Britain and the US continue to slowly execute him?

Assange's case is expected to be discussed during Prime Minister Albanese's current visit to the US, which includes a state dinner hosted by Biden on October 25. MP Monique Ryan, part of the pro-Assange delegation, told news outlets: "Our prime minister needs to see this as a test case for standing up to the US government. There are concerns among Australians about the AUKUS agreement ([link removed]) , and whether we have any agency" (Business Insider, 10/1/23 ([link removed]) ).

As Common Dreams (9/19/23 ([link removed]) ) quoted from the delegation’s letter:

We believe the right and best course of action would be for the United States' Department of Justice to cease its pursuit and prosecution of Julian Assange.... It is well and truly time for this matter to end, and for Julian Assange to return home.




Read more ([link removed])

Share this post: <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Twitter"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Twitter" alt="Twitter" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Facebook"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Facebook" alt="Facebook" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Pinterest"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Pinterest" alt="Pinterest" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="LinkedIn"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="LinkedIn" alt="LinkedIn" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Google Plus"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Google Plus" alt="Google Plus" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Instapaper"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Instapaper" alt="Instapaper" class="mc-share"></a>
​

© 2021 Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting. All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you signed up for email alerts from
Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting

Our mailing address is:
FAIRNESS & ACCURACY IN REPORTING
124 W. 30th Street, Suite 201
New York, NY 10001

FAIR's Website ([link removed])

FAIR counts on your support to do this work — please donate today ([link removed]) .

Follow us on Twitter ([link removed]) | Friend us on Facebook ([link removed])

change your preferences ([link removed])
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]
unsubscribe ([link removed]) .