Joining the ranks of higher ed faculty isn’t as simple as being the most qualified
[link removed]
CounterCurrent:
“I Hope I Get It”
Joining the ranks of higher ed faculty isn’t as simple as being the most qualified
CounterCurrent is the National Association of Scholars’ weekly newsletter, bringing you the biggest issues in academia and our responses to them.
[link removed]
Category: DEI, Higher Education;
Reading Time: ~4 minutes
------------------------------------------------------------
** Featured Report: Diversity Statement, Then Dossier ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
Has academia yet again traded quality for quantity? “Cluster hiring” is not a new practice in higher education, according to John D. Sailer in his new report Diversity Statement, Then Dossier ([link removed]) . But the addition of “diversity, equity, and inclusion” (DEI) to cluster hiring practices is a growing trend that should raise concerns for academic freedom and the mission of higher education. Sailer has done extensive research over the last several years to uncover the truth behind DEI cluster hiring, and what it means for the future of academia.
What is cluster hiring exactly? Until now, cluster hiring (i.e., “the coordinated hiring of faculty members in several departments to work on a shared research topic”) has been a tool to enhance faculty productivity and strengthen institutional subject matter knowledge. However, cluster hiring has now become a gateway for funneling minority faculty and DEI advocates into the classroom. Take for instance this job listing ([link removed]) , which is by no means unique in its DEI-saturated language,
The Ohio State University’s Department of Mathematics recently sought a professor who will “study issues relevant to educational equity across STEM fields, with a special focus on race and other factors identifying historically marginalized groups.”
In his report, Sailer identifies multiple problems with the rise of DEI cluster hiring, though only a couple will be highlighted here (make sure to read Sailer’s full report ([link removed]) ). First, for an applicant to even get their foot in the door, they have to pass the diversity statement litmus test. Those who dissent from the orthodoxy rarely make it past the first round of diversity statement assessments, much less the first round of interviews. Additionally, a diversity statement requirement on applications is a handy way to camouflage racial preferences as far as faculty ethnicity.
Consider the Berkeley Life Sciences Initiative. The applicant pool was 53.7 percent white and 13.2 percent Hispanic. The shortlist was 13.6 percent white and 59.1 percent Hispanic. The largest reduction in the proportion of white candidates, and the largest increase in the proportion of Hispanic candidates, happened after the first-round review of diversity statements.
Second, DEI cluster hiring is being fueled by government funding. Take for instance the National Institute of Health’s Faculty Institutional Recruitment for Sustainable Transformation (FIRST) program. The FIRST program was “designed to award $241 million to universities over nine years, specifically for creating faculty cluster hires.” Though it seems harmless, a deeper dive reveals the issue therein: faculty must “have demonstrated a strong commitment to promoting diversity and inclusive excellence” if they are hired using FIRST money. Government funded initiatives can easily become a way to propagandize harmful ideologies on campus and derail our higher ed institutions from their true and deeper purpose—to educate.
The perversion of cluster hiring practices by DEI is a growing trend that cannot be ignored. Not only are twenty-two out of the top twenty-five public universities outwardly committed to DEI cluster hiring, this practice has spread to medical schools and institutions outside of the top twenty-five.
As academia continues to sell its soul, integrity, and freedom for little more than government handouts and virtue signaling, one has to wonder, when will the madness end? What will be the proverbial “straw” that breaks the camel’s back? Hiring faculty based on their contributions to a politically-fueled ideology over their qualifications is ludicrous and will ultimately derail the pursuit of truth and excellence in colleges and universities.
Until next week.
Kali Jerrard
Communications Associate
National Association of Scholars
Read the Report ([link removed])
For more on DEI and higher ed:
[link removed]
July 27, 2023
** DEI Laws Are Meaningless Without Enforcement ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
Louis K. Bonham
At long last, some state legislatures have begun reacting to the “wokeness” epidemic that has consumed both K-12 and higher education ... (but) expecting state employees to simply obey laws that forbid practices they consider moral imperatives is naïve.
[link removed]
July 25, 2023
** Minding the Sciences — DEI Takes the NIH ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
John Staddon
Instead of trying to understand, and perhaps solve, the many real problems of grant review, NIH seems to be responding to social-justice pressures in ways that will make things worse—less science-based and more ideological.
[link removed]
January 19, 2023
** Report: Comprehensive Restructuring ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
John D. Sailer
This report finds that UT Austin's DEI initiatives espouse a clear ideological agenda, call for a vast overhaul of curriculum and instruction, and more.
** About the NAS
------------------------------------------------------------
The National Association of Scholars, founded in 1987, emboldens reasoned scholarship and propels civil debate. We’re the leading organization of scholars and citizens committed to higher education as the catalyst of American freedom.
============================================================
Follow NAS on social media.
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Twitter ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
** Donate ([link removed])
| ** Join ([link removed])
| ** Renew ([link removed])
| ** Bookstore ([link removed])
Copyright © 2023 National Association of Scholars, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website, membership or donation forms, contact forms at events, or by signing open letters.
Our mailing address is:
National Association of Scholars
420 Madison Avenue
7th Floor
New York, NY 10017-2418
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
