View online | Unsubscribe (one-click).
For inquiries/unsubscribe issues, Contact Us














?
Learn more about Jeeng

?
Learn more about Jeeng

?
Learn more about Jeeng

?
Learn more about Jeeng
?
?
Learn more about Jeeng


Want to accelerate software development at your company? See how we can help.
Want to accelerate software development at your company? See how we can help.

They Raised a $1 Million for a Device That Gives You Lucid Dreams. Could It Really? - Slate Magazine   

Eric Wollberg’s interest in facilitating lucid dreams emerged while living in Jerusalem, reading lots of theology. “Abraham, Muhammad, Buddha, all those prophets received their prophetic wisdom in their dreams,” the startup and tech investment alum told me recently. During some periods of his life, Wollberg too regularly experienced the sorts of dreams where he knew he was awake. He wondered whether there was a way to use emerging technology to have them on demand.

Last February a hint came from, of all people, Grimes. The electronic pop artist retweeted a software engineer named Wesley Berry III, who was playing around with turning brain waves into art and running his computer with his thoughts. Soon Wollberg was at Berry’s house in San Francisco, pitching him on applying one of these electrode-filled brain activity–monitoring headsets to lucid dreams.

Within just four months, Wollberg and Berry’s new company, Prophetic, raised more than $1 million in funding for a consumer device—the “Halo”—from venture capital heavy hitters and acquired advisers who’d worked in neurotech at Apple. They also promptly forged a research collaboration with a widely respected neuroscience institute and a company that built hardware for Elon Musk’s brain-computer interface company Neuralink, a detail that has been featured in articles about this new “A.I. startup.” Already they’ve invited customers to pay to reserve one of the first devices, which they intend to start shipping in 2025. At an event in New York City on Friday, potential investors will see a “prototype” of the Halo and learn about the company’s plan to use generative A.I., similar to the tech behind ChatGPT, on brain data to induce and stabilize lucidity in the dreamer.

Continued here



?
Learn more about Jeeng

?
Learn more about Jeeng

?
Learn more about Jeeng

?
Learn more about Jeeng
?
?
Learn more about Jeeng




?
Learn more about Jeeng

?
Learn more about Jeeng

?
Learn more about Jeeng

?
Learn more about Jeeng
?
?
Learn more about Jeeng


An Awkward Evolutionary Theory for One of Pregnancy’s Biggest Complications - The Atlantic   

In the early 1990s, while studying preeclampsia in Guadeloupe, Pierre-Yves Robillard hit upon a realization that seemed to shake the foundations of his field. Preeclampsia, a pregnancy complication that causes some 500,000 fetal deaths and 70,000 maternal deaths around the world each year, had for decades been regarded as a condition most common among new mothers, whose bodies were mounting an inappropriate attack on a first baby. But Robillard, now a neonatologist and epidemiologist at Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de La Réunion, on Réunion Island in the Indian Ocean, kept seeing the condition crop up during second, third, or fourth pregnancies—a pattern that a few other studies had documented, but had yet to fully explain. Then, Robillard noticed something else. “These women had changed the father,” he told me. The catalyst in these cases of preeclampsia, he eventually surmised, wasn’t the newness of pregnancy. It was the newness of paternal genetic material that, maybe, the mother hadn’t had enough exposure to before.

Robillard’s idea was unconventional not only because it challenged the dogma of the time, but because it implied certain evolutionary consequences. Preeclampsia appears to be exclusive (or almost exclusive) to humans, and may have arisen as a by-product of the particularly aggressive ways in which our fetuses pillage their mother’s body for resources. So, Robillard and his colleagues posited, maybe the dangers it poses then pressured humans into developing a bizarre trait: being rather inefficient at conceiving offspring. Maybe, if humans aren’t terribly fertile, they need to have a lot of sex; maybe having a lot of sex repeatedly exposes a mother to her partner’s semen, inuring her to the molecular makeup of future offspring. If preeclampsia is a kind of immune overreaction, then perhaps unprotected sex is the world’s most unconventional allergy shot.

That, at least, is what Robillard and his colleagues contend—a notion that’s “a bit controversial, and a bit awkward,” Inkeri Lokki, an immunologist and reproductive biologist at the University of Helsinki, told me. She remembers a senior researcher in the field once framing the upshot of the hypothesis as “pick your partner early, and practice.”

Continued here




?
Learn more about Jeeng

?
Learn more about Jeeng

?
Learn more about Jeeng

?
Learn more about Jeeng
?
?
Learn more about Jeeng


You are receiving this mailer as a TradeBriefs subscriber.
We fight fake/biased news through human curation & independent editorials.
Your support of ads like these makes it possible. Alternatively, get TradeBriefs Premium (ad-free) for only $2/month
If you still wish to unsubscribe, you can unsubscribe from all our emails here
Our address is 309 Town Center 1, Andheri Kurla Road, Andheri East, Mumbai 400059 - 93544947