[link removed]

FAIR
View article on FAIR's website ([link removed])
Unconfirmed 'Beheaded Babies' Report Helped Justify Israeli Slaughter Saurav Sarkar ([link removed])


i24: Horror Scenes at Kibbutz Liberated From Hamas

Nicole Zedek (i24, 10/10/23 ([link removed]) ) reports from the scene of the alleged mass decapitation.

There’s perhaps no more serious a time for journalists to do their jobs responsibly than during a war.

But corporate media have not been, as evidenced by their repetition of the shocking, unsubstantiated claim that Hamas had beheaded 40 babies in its violent attack on a kibbutz in southern Israel on October 7.

It all started with television reporting by journalist Nicole Zedek, who works for the 24-hour Israeli cable news channel i24, now embedded with the Israeli Defense Forces. In one October 10 report ([link removed]) , she said, “I’m talking to some of the soldiers, and they say what they’ve witnessed…babies, their heads cut off.” In another report later that day ([link removed]) , she says, “About 40 babies at least were taken out on gurneys,” prompting the host to interject: “Nicole, I have to cut in—that’s such a shocking, jarring statement there…. You’re saying 40 babies, dead babies?”

Zedek’s reporting was cobbled together into the viral claim that 40 babies were beheaded, despite that, by her own account ([link removed]) , she had not seen the bodies herself, and relied solely on Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) soldiers as her sources. This might not have mattered as much if she were reporting on a less inflammatory subject, or had a more reliable source, but the IDF is known for misleading journalists ([link removed]) .

The next day, Zedek told a podcast (Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show, 10/11/23 ([link removed]) ) that “it’s sickening” that people were scrutinizing her reporting of alleged baby beheadings closely: “We have these soldiers confirming what they’ve seen of the mutilation of these children.”

The claim remains up ([link removed]) on i24’s website, as of October 18. Israel’s largest newspaper Ha'aretz (12/2/19 ([link removed]) ) found in a 2019 investigation that i24 had compromised its integrity years earlier by becoming more pro-Netanyahu in order to obtain a broadcast license. It also reputedly has close ties to the Israeli military (Anadolu Ajansi, 10/11/23 ([link removed]) ).


** Amplifying the claim
------------------------------------------------------------
Business Insider: IDF says Hamas fighters killed and decapitated babies at one kibbutz near the Gaza border

Business Insider (10/10/23 ([link removed]) ): "A spokesperson for the Israel Defense Forces told Insider on Tuesday that its soldiers found the decapitated corpses of babies...although he hadn't seen images or videos himself."

But Zedek and i24 alone could not have produced the flood of social media posts about 40 decapitated babies. That took other outlets amplifying her "reporting" within hours, lending it further credibility and helping it go viral. Some typical headlines:
* "IDF Says Hamas Fighters Killed and Decapitated Babies at One Kibbutz Near the Gaza Border" (Business Insider, 10/10/23 ([link removed]) )
* “Hamas kills 40 Babies and Children—Beheading Some of Them—at Israeli Kibbutz: Report” (New York Post, 10/10/23 ([link removed]) )
* “Israeli Forces Say They’ve Uncovered Evidence of Brutal Killings: ‘They Cut Heads of Children’” (The Hill, 10/10/23 ([link removed]) )

The British Daily Mail (10/10/23 ([link removed]) ) got it all into the headline:

Hamas Terrorists "Beheaded Babies During Kibbutz Slaughter Where 40 Young Children Were Killed": IDF Soldiers Reveal Families Were Killed in Their Bedrooms—"Not in War, Not a Battlefield... a Massacre'"

Later in the day, a Turkish news outlet (Anadolu Ajansi, 10/10/23 ([link removed]) ) did what Zedek and others should have done in the first place, reporting the story rather than just repeating the sources’ claims. It called the Israeli Defense Forces and found that the military would not confirm the account—a minimal step that Zedek and the many outlets that repeated her claims should have taken, given the gravity of the charges.

But the damage had been done; by Wednesday, nearly a dozen British newspapers ran the i24 claims ([link removed]) on their front pages. The Israeli government picked up the story ([link removed]) and ran with it too, even as it wouldn’t confirm it. Eventually, US President Biden was caught saying that he had seen photos of decapitated infants ([link removed]) when he had not; the White House was forced to issue ([link removed]) an embarrassing “clarification.”


** Why does it matter?
------------------------------------------------------------
Reuters: Israel releases images of slain children to rally support

Reuters (10/13/23 ([link removed]) ): "There were no images to suggest militants had beheaded babies—a particularly explosive accusation that first emerged in Israel's media and initially confirmed by Israeli officials."

So we have a story, and that story was generated in a grossly irresponsible way, and then repeated over and over. But what proof do we have that the story is false? After all, even if it was reported badly, and repeated without additional substantiation, it might be true.

Aside from the questionable nature of the sourcing, there is circumstantial evidence that it is false. The Israeli government released horrific images of dead infants over social media (Reuters, 10/13/23 ([link removed]) ). None of the photos showed any evidence of decapitated infants. If the Israeli government had proof that such a horrifying crime had been committed, and was willing to release other traumatic photos of dead infants, surely it would have also released the ones that backed up its claims?

Even with all this said, why does it matter? After all, other horrific crimes were committed in southern Israel. It matters because the war in Gaza was already underway when i24 reported on the “decapitated babies” story—about 260 children were killed in the Gaza Strip as of October 10 (AP, 10/10/23 ([link removed]) ). To maintain lockstep international support, the IDF needed to differentiate its mass slaughter from Hamas's violence--which it could only do by painting Hamas as sadistic, savage, subhuman. The claim about beheading babies was ideal for the job: a shocking story that served to turn off logic and critical thinking. Who wouldn’t want to avenge murdered, desecrated infants?

Such stories have worked in the past; when Iraq invaded Kuwait in 1991, George H.W. Bush repeated the claims of a 15-year-old Kuwaiti teen that she had seen Iraqi soldiers take babies in Kuwait out of incubators and leave them to die (Democracy Now!, 12/5/18 ([link removed]) ). The teenager later turned out to be the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador ([link removed]) to the US, and her claims to be fabrications orchestrated by a DC public relations firm ([link removed]) hired by the Kuwaiti government.

In addition, the Israeli government explicitly attempted to draw an equation ([link removed]) between Hamas and ISIS, noted for their use of decapitation ([link removed]) as a tactic. This aspect of the claim evokes stereotypes ([link removed]) of "barbaric" Muslims.

By credulously repeating the soldiers’ claims and Zedek’s reporting on them, countless outlets around the world have contributed to these harms. And the people who have suffered the most in the process are the million-plus children of Gaza.
Read more ([link removed])

Share this post: <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Twitter"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Twitter" alt="Twitter" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Facebook"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Facebook" alt="Facebook" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Pinterest"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Pinterest" alt="Pinterest" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="LinkedIn"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="LinkedIn" alt="LinkedIn" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Google Plus"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Google Plus" alt="Google Plus" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Instapaper"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Instapaper" alt="Instapaper" class="mc-share"></a>
​

© 2021 Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting. All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you signed up for email alerts from
Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting

Our mailing address is:
FAIRNESS & ACCURACY IN REPORTING
124 W. 30th Street, Suite 201
New York, NY 10001

FAIR's Website ([link removed])

FAIR counts on your support to do this work — please donate today ([link removed]) .

Follow us on Twitter ([link removed]) | Friend us on Facebook ([link removed])

change your preferences ([link removed])
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]
unsubscribe ([link removed]) .