Friend,

This past week Republican legislators in the Oregon House and Senate left the Capitol building to prevent a vote of the legislature on a controversial piece of legislation. I remained in the Capitol and did not join my Republican colleagues. I want to share my thinking with my bosses – the people of Bend who I was elected to serve – why I remain.

I believe in moderate, bipartisan policy making. And while there are many die-hard Republicans and Democrats in our community, I believe the vast majority of Bend residents share a desire for moderate, bipartisan leadership, including the growing number of people who choose not to register with either major political party. But what does this mean in practice?

For me, it means leadership and willingness to compromise. Rolling up my sleeves, bringing people together, making concessions, and creating policies that work for all Oregonians. It means not placing any single issue ahead of all others. It means avoiding litmus tests. It means rejecting rigid right-left ideological extremes and finding common ground whenever possible. It means being tolerant and open-minded of different points of view. And sometimes it means accepting that my position on a particular issue, no matter how strongly I feel about it, may not be the majority among my colleagues.

After serving Bend in elected office for the past ten years – on the school board and now as your State Representative, I’ve learned that it’s important to have grace in victory and also that there is no shame in principled defeat. That’s the heart of representative democracy. 

The legislation at the center of this controversy is called cap and trade (SB 1350). It’s well-intentioned goal is to do Oregon’s part in fighting global climate change. In practice, it places new limits on emissions from manufacturing businesses and energy production while also putting new costs - taxes and fees - on the fuels we use to drive our cars and trucks, to heat our homes, cook our food and to power our businesses. The tens of millions collected each year from individuals and businesses are supposed to be spent by state government for energy-related projects across the state.

My primary objection to this bill is that I believe the significant economic costs on hard working Oregonians outweigh the minimal climate benefits for the world. I say this as someone who for ten years has voluntarily paid more each month for our restaurant business to purchase renewable energy from our local utility. 

In Bend, the high cost of living is major problem. The day to day costs of housing, gasoline, food, childcare and healthcare are a real challenge for many in our community – especially those living paycheck to paycheck or on fixed incomes. Bend is becoming unaffordable for many. This bill makes life more expensive and threatens the jobs and livelihoods for many small businesses, particularly in farming and transportation. So, I am a no vote on this bill. I also voted no on HB 2020 a similar bill that passed the Oregon House last year. I would vote to let Oregonians decide the issue on the ballot. What I won’t do is deny those legislators that support this bill the ability to vote. 

As a moderate who wants to support common ground climate legislation, I am deeply saddened that partisan polarization has pushed Oregon’s Capitol to this moment. I believe we should try harder and reach further to find common ground. I know that my position angers those on the right who demand greater Party loyalty and those on the left who believe I should support this legislation no matter its flaws. In the end, the voters of Bend will have their say about all this come election time. In the meantime, I’ll be at the Capitol doing my best to serve the people of Bend, whether you voted for me or not, and to be your moderate voice and vote in the Oregon House of Representatives.

- CHERI 
 

 

 

 

Paid for by Cheri Helt for State Representative