Much of the US government is paralyzed because the Republican caucus is so fractured it cannot elect a Speaker to get the House of Representatives organized and running again.
View this email in your browser
[link removed]
[link removed]
Hi John,
In Washington, much of the US government is paralyzed because the Republican caucus is so fractured it cannot elect a Speaker to get the House of Representatives organized and running again. This petty, internecine battle is completely detached from the reality most Americans face and the global crises the United States must manage. We’re going to stick to energy issues in On the Grid, but recommend you read Jonathan Martin’s latest Politico article
[link removed]
to get the why behind this ongoing saga.
By most standards, the US economy is doing exceptionally well, with low unemployment rates, near-record job creation numbers, and healthy consumer spending
[link removed]
. Yet, with three-quarters
[link removed]
of Americans perceiving the economy negatively, it's clear that these metrics aren’t telling the economic story most Americans are living.
Many working families measure the health of the economy at the gas pump and on their utility bills. As long as costs stay high, and personal budgets are squeezed, families will feel like the economy is in bad shape. They’re right to be concerned about paying the bills, and policymakers should speak to that concern. That's why Third Way has recommendations and talking points
[link removed]
to help Democrats set the record straight. Here are three toplines:
Highlight policies that will cut costs quickly, like producing more domestic oil and tapping into oil reserves to bring prices down.
Emphasize the importance of stability and energy independence by stressing long-term policies that will help build a reliable, secure, and independent energy sector and hold bad-faith actors accountable.
Consistently and clearly communicate the accomplishments and continued commitment to lower costs for American families today and in the future.
We’re keeping an eye on energy markets and will refresh our recommendations as dynamics shift–stay tuned for the latest!
Over the past year, what began as a minor talking point on Fox News has snowballed
[link removed]
into a wider, more alarming misconception–increasingly, the Biden Administration's clean energy agenda is being described by skeptical centrists and right-wing politicians as a radical leftist agenda This couldn’t be further from the truth. In reality, the Administration is embracing a pragmatic, market-based approach that makes all clean energy technologies more affordable, reliable, and secure. It’s disconcerting to see this get muddled, but it’s especially troubling when centrists further this confusion.
We believe it’s essential to address these misconceptions head-on. You can read our full response here
[link removed]
, but here are a few highlights that challenge the outlandish claim that the Administration is pushing a radical agenda:
Instead of excluding technologies and following a renewables-only agenda, the Biden Administration has provided half a trillion to develop and deploy a broad range of clean energy technologies–including carbon capture and nuclear energy.
The Administration has put the US economy at the heart of climate and energy efforts, notably in the auto industry, where the Biden administration has made key investments to ensure that the next generation of vehicles are Made in America and prevent China from dictating the terms of the global market.
Contrary to the left's call to ban fossil fuels, President Biden boosted US oil and gas production, helping reach record levels of production and shielding Americans from global price shocks.
This Administration's climate plan is a wholeheartedly pragmatic approach that addresses both the challenges of climate change and the need for economic revitalization, evident in its commitment to support for industries ranging from clean energy to manufacturing, with an emphasis on creating good-paying jobs and sharpening America’s competitive edge.
American automakers are rapidly ramping up EV production, responding to growing demand for cleaner transport and ensuring that the US is well-positioned to rival China’s dominant market presence. But many Americans still have reservations, citing concerns about limited charging infrastructure and battery reliability. Autoworkers, especially those in unions, have serious concerns about maintaining job security in this shifting landscape.
Critics are seizing on these concerns, using this opportunity to scrutinize the Administration's commitment to supporting the American auto industry and its workers. Some lawmakers have suggested
[link removed]
, falsely, that investing in EV production is capitulating to China, though it is, in fact, the opposite. When we invest in EVs, we become more competitive with China and thrive in the process We developed messaging guidance to help Americans understand the benefits of the EV transition, without getting mired in far-left and far-right talking points. Here’s a quick overview:
The transition to EV manufacturing will grow American jobs, both in existing union-led fields like auto manufacturing and in new industries, like battery manufacturing.
Federal investments–tax credits and domestic content rules–are building a strong domestic EV supply chain that will cut our reliance on countries like Russia and China for critical materials.
The US has a proven track record of building cars that Americans love, and as we shift to EVs, we will uphold that legacy, all while effectively challenging China’s market presence and putting American automakers in the lead.
Check out our full suite of recommendations on reframing EVs beyond the traditional environmental narrative
[link removed]
and how to effectively address voters’ immediate concerns.
[link removed]
David Leonhardt,
[link removed]
in The New York Times, dives into the importance of federal investment for the American economy, national security, and leadership, looking at historical precedents to make the case for continued investment in our infrastructure and technology industries.
Jeva Lange
[link removed]
in Heatmap fact-checks myths about electrified transportation.
Jason Bordoff
[link removed]
, on the Columbia Energy Exchange podcast series, sits down with Dr. Daniel Yergin to discuss the unfolding violence in the Middle East and the outlook it could have for energy markets.
Carbon-Free Europe
[link removed]
, Third Way’s transatlantic initiative, focused on building inclusive support for climate and clean energy policies across Europe and the United Kingdom, launches its social media debut!
[link removed]
Let’s keep the conversation going,
Mary Sagatelova
Senior Advocacy Advisor | Third Way
216.394.7615 :: @MarySagatelova
[link removed]
Did someone forward you this email? Sign up to receive The Grid in your inbox HERE
[link removed]
.
Copyright © 2023 Third Way. All rights reserved.
Want to change how you receive these emails? You can update your preferences.
[link removed]
