To view this email as a web page, click here

.
AEI's weekly digest of top commentary and scholarship on the issues that matter most

The Crisis in the Middle East

What Is Iran’s Role in Hamas’s Attack on Israel?

October 14, 2023

Hamas’s horrifying attack on Israel has claimed over 1,200 lives and thrown the Middle East into turmoil. As Israel and the US formulate their response, the nature of Iran’s involvement and backing remains one of the most important questions to resolve. Writing for Foreign Policy, Danielle Pletka shows how Iranian officials had been publicly encouraging an attack like this for months.

 

 

Israel’s government has yet to settle on its military strategy and ultimate objectives for responding to Hamas’s attack. In past crises, Israel has limited itself to air strikes or limited incursions, but what would a larger ground invasion look like? Kenneth M. Pollack explains and evaluates the prospects and risks of Israel’s likely military options.

 

An increasingly insurmountable rift between Iran’s theocratic regime and its large youth population threatens the long-term prospects of the Islamic Republic. In a new Critical Threats Project and AEI report, Kitaneh Fitzpatrick analyzes the shape of this domestic crisis and assesses the ideological “soft war” Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei is waging on Western cultural influences.

 

Meanwhile, the US Congress remains paralyzed as Republicans are still unable to agree on a new Speaker of the House. In the New York Times, Yuval Levin dissects the “perverse misalignment of incentives” between our constitutional and electoral structures that have made constructive, legislative work so difficult.

 

From 2009 to 2018, China spent some $60 billion on electronic vehicle (EV) development, and now both the US and Europe are struggling to compete with the scale of Chinese EV exports. While the US has dramatically responded with subsidies and tariffs, Claude Barfield argues that Europe’s domestic industry is likely to be overwhelmed.

The Social Workplace: Social Capital, Human Dignity, and Work in America, Volume II

Beyond providing for our economic needs, work can be a source of social connection and personal fulfillment. In a new report from AEI’s Survey Center on American Life, Daniel A. Cox, Brent Orrell, Kyle Gray, and Jessie Wall continue their exploration of these social aspects of work, drawing from a June 2022 survey of 5,037 American adults. Do Americans feel that work is meeting their psychological and self-esteem needs? In general, while a majority of Americans receive noneconomic benefits from work, those with higher levels of education report higher levels of connection, engagement, and development at work. Those with lower levels of educational attainment report fewer professional development opportunities and less attention from supervisors, suggesting that college degrees continue to define access to satisfying jobs and successful careers.

 

 

More from AEI
RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY

Real-Time Analysis on the Israel-Gaza Conflict

Foreign and Defense Policy scholars
American Enterprise Institute

Hamas Consigns the Pax Americana to History Books

Hal Brands
Bloomberg Opinion

Putin’s Russia Reverses Three and a Half Decades of Diplomacy

Leon Aron
AEIdeas

Blue-State Benefits: How Federal Grants Fail to Consider Population Shift

Howard Husock
American Enterprise Institute

No Daylight

Matthew Continetti
Washington Free Beacon

PODCASTS AND VIDEOS

High Cost Punditry

Jonah Goldberg and Jay Cost
The Remnant with Jonah Godlberg

Why Aren’t We Holding Iran Responsible for the Attack on Israel?

Danielle Pletka, Marc A. Thiessen, and Elliott Abrams
What the Hell Is Going On?

The Massacre in Israel and the Cracks in US Foreign Policy

Giselle Donnelly, Dalibor Rohac, and Iulia Joja
The Eastern Front

Harriet McDonald and Jennifer Mitchell on the Doe Fund

Brent Orrell, Harriet McDonald, and Jennifer Mitchell
Hardly Working

Democracy or Republic? | 6 in 60

Jay Cost
AEI video

QUOTE OF THE WEEK

If campus officials do choose to speak up, and then do so on some issues rather than others, they should hardly be surprised when observers take note. If they weigh in on court rulings, policy decisions, or individual tragedies, their silence on gruesome rampages will be hard to miss. And if they somehow feel okay about approaching abortion, race-conscious policies, and policing as simple morality plays, and only discover complexity in a moment like the present one—well, one can only conclude that their moral compass is broken.

Frederick M. Hess