[ Fast-food workers compel McDonald’s and Starbucks to abandon a
ballot measure that would have squelched both.]
[[link removed]]

HALF A MILLION CALIFORNIA WORKERS GET A RAISE—AND A SEAT AT THE
TABLE  
[[link removed]]


 

Harold Meyerson
September 13, 2023
The American Prospect
[[link removed]]


*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

_ Fast-food workers compel McDonald’s and Starbucks to abandon a
ballot measure that would have squelched both. _

RINGO CHIU VIA AP In a deal partially overseen by California Gov.
Gavin Newsom’s staffers, the fast-food industry agreed to withdraw a
referendum from next year’s ballot that would have stifled worker
power., RINGO CHIU VIA AP

 

In the realm of burgers and fries, California’s hot labor summer is
sizzling.

In a remarkable reversal of fortune, the state’s fast-food worker
movement, created and steered by the Service Employees International
Union (SEIU), has compelled the giants of the fast-food industry
[[link removed]] (both
national stalwarts like McDonald’s, Wendy’s, Burger King, and
Starbucks and local legends like In-N-Out) to withdraw their
opposition to raising their workers’ wages and establishing a
statewide labor-business board to deal with industry issues.

Last year, after the legislature and Gov. Gavin Newsom signed into law
a bill that established such a council to raise those wages, the
industry announced it would put $200 million behind a ballot measure
it had devised to overturn that law. “This was just three frickin’
days after the bill was signed into law,” says SEIU President Mary
Kay Henry. “It was a gut punch.”

The industry was following in the footsteps of Uber and Lyft, which
had spent hundreds of millions
[[link removed]] to
persuade state voters to overturn a law that would have required them
to pay at least minimum wages to their drivers. They saturated the
media with ads telling Californians that a yes vote on their measure
would increase drivers’ incomes, and thus misinformed, voters
approved the measure. (To keep that from happening again, the
legislature just passed and Newsom signed a new law under which voters
will be asked not to vote yes or no, but whether to “keep the law”
or “overturn” it.)

A year later, studies showed that drivers were making a paltry $6.20
an hour
[[link removed]] on
net driving for Uber and Lyft. But the companies had won their ballot
measure, and given the inanities of California’s direct democracy,
the only way to make things right for rideshare workers would be to
pass a different ballot measure, over the industry’s wishes (and
dollars).

Confronted by the prospect of another such megabucks industry
campaign, SEIU began planning to wage a correspondingly costly
opposition effort. But it did more than that. Progressive legislators
obtained the votes for two more bills. The first would make companies
like McDonald’s, and not just individual franchise owners, liable
for violations of wage, health, and safety laws; the second
would fund the long-dormant Industrial Welfare Commission (IWC)
[[link removed]],
a division of the state Department of Industrial Relations that has
the power to set wage levels and standards in a host of industries,
with no limits on the size of its wage increases.

With the IWC funding already passed in the state budget and the
franchising bill set to pass this week (which is the final week of
this year’s legislative session), the industry relented. In a deal
partially overseen by Newsom’s staffers, the companies agreed to
withdraw their referendum from next year’s ballot in return for
guarantees that the IWC will be defunded and the franchising bill,
which had the votes to pass, would not be voted on. (To facilitate
this, the legislature had to pass a new law, which Newsom already has
signed, enabling the sponsors of referendums to withdraw them from the
ballot.)

The deal that has emerged will give the state’s roughly 550,000
fast-food workers a raise, taking full effect in April, from an hourly
wage of $15.50 to $20. It guarantees the workers an annual wage
adjustment of either 3.5 percent or the increase in the cost of
living, whichever is lower. With minor adjustments, it preserves the
labor-management council that the law passed last year established.
The nine-member council will consist of two franchise owner-operators,
two representatives from the fast-food mega-corporations, two union
representatives, two rank-and-file fast-food workers, and one public
member. It will work alongside the state’s Department of Labor,
which could monitor and enforce violations the council can highlight.

“There are lots of issues the council can address,” says SEIU’s
Henry. “It can deal with health and safety concerns; it can deal
with workplace violence.”

Business-labor-government bodies have existed before in the United
States, during World War I and in the early years of the Great
Depression. California’s new council marks a departure, though, from
more recent labor relations. It’s not really a form of sectoral
bargaining
[[link removed]],
such as exists in most democracies with advanced economies. Given the
straitjacket that our emaciated labor law places on workers’ right
to form or join unions, fast-food workers remain unorganized. A few
other blue states do have wage boards, but their jurisdiction is
largely over workers in facilities that have government contracts.

Even with its limited ability to affect wages, however, the California
board extends the council model to places where it hasn’t gone in
nearly a century.

“The council has limited jurisdiction,” says Larry Cohen, the
former president of the Communications Workers of America and the U.S.
labor leader best versed in the range of bargaining models that other
nations employ. “Compared to any other democracy on the planet,
we’re at the bottom when it comes to sectoral bargaining. But the
deal that’s just gone through is a game changer for the fast-food
workers. It’s an almost immediate 30 percent raise, which can make a
huge difference in their lives.”

Can workers’ presence opposite management at the new California
table also spur SEIU’s long-standing efforts to unionize fast-food
workers? Henry thinks it can. “We intend to build worker
organization as a part of making the council work,” she says.
“When the $20 wage goes into effect, that will whet workers’
appetite, too.” SEIU will also push to have other blue states adopt
the council model as well, which it hopes will build more nationwide
pressure for McDonald’s, Starbucks et al. to cease opposing their
workers’ efforts to unionize.

The fast-food deal isn’t the only breakthrough for workers moving
though Sacramento this week. Another bill likely to move to Newsom’s
desk would raise the wages of hospital support staffers to $25, to be
phased in over a number of years. A long-becalmed bill permitting the
legislature’s own staff to unionize has begun to move as well. And a
bill allowing striking workers to qualify for unemployment insurance,
a particularly important measure given the hot labor summer and the
continuing walkout of the Screen Actors Guild and the Writers Guild of
America that has brought most Hollywood production to a halt,
has passed the Assembly
[[link removed]] and
is on the way to the Senate.

But the survival of the fast-food council is the biggest victory, in
part due to the unique strategy employed by worker advocates who have
been overwhelmed by big money in California for years. Instead of
watching helplessly as industry throws prodigious sums together for
deceptive campaigns that accomplish at the ballot what it cannot in
the legislature, labor used its leverage with Sacramento’s elected
representatives to force business into submission.

The 2022 elections brought a number of pro-labor progressives to the
legislature, many of whom had to defeat more conservative Democratic
candidates to get there. That, in turn, was the result of a major
progressive mobilization, involving California’s Working Families
Party, and union rank-and-filers. And not just union members.

“Our fast-food workers—who are 80 percent immigrants, Latinas,
Blacks—knocked on doors alongside SEIU members,” Henry says.
“This was a David-against-Goliath battle, and the Davids
prevailed.”

_Harold Meyerson is editor at large of The American Prospect._

Read the original article at Prospect.org.
[[link removed]]  

Used with the permission. © The American Prospect, Prospect.org,
2023. All rights reserved. 

Click here to support the Prospect's brand of independent impact
journalism. [[link removed]]

* Workers Fightback
[[link removed]]
* California
[[link removed]]
* MacDonald's
[[link removed]]
* Starbucks
[[link removed]]

*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

 

 

 

INTERPRET THE WORLD AND CHANGE IT

 

 

Submit via web
[[link removed]]

Submit via email
Frequently asked questions
[[link removed]]

Manage subscription
[[link removed]]

Visit xxxxxx.org
[[link removed]]

Twitter [[link removed]]

Facebook [[link removed]]

 




[link removed]

To unsubscribe, click the following link:
[link removed]