Freedom
(or not) of Movement
|
|
This week, the media is focused on tracking COVID-19 throughout
the world, raising concerns of borders closing to limit its spread. In
light of this, we're taking a look at the freedom of movement (or the
lack thereof) when restrictions are considered.
|
 |
No Schengen Restrictions
|
All eyes were on Italy this past week as it became the
European nation with the most cases of COVID-19, triggering calls for
Schengen restrictions. As La Repubblica reports, the Italians
do not want to isolate their nation from the rest of Europe, but to
manage the issue at local levels. Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte
announced that measures will be taken in the areas of outbreak in
order to contain the spread, with the collaboration between law
enforcement and the general public. Several other ministers have
already taken steps in limiting public gatherings, such as cancelling
school trips and sporting events. Furthermore, the Italian officials
have indicated that affected municipalities may also see the temporary
closure of workplaces and businesses, but accessing essential public
services remains possible (albeit conditional). And so, Italy has
taken the steps to quarantining local municipalities following last
week’s rise in COVID-19 cases. Interestingly enough however, La
Repubblica reports that Prime Minister Conte is staunchly against
closing the national borders, due to the potential impact to the
Italian economy if that were to happen.
|
|
 |
Closing Doors
|
Along the lines of entry restrictions, German news agency
Zeit Online recently wrote an article on the immigration reform
currently underway in Great Britain. British Home Secretary Priti
Patel proposed an immigration law where a new points system will be
put in place, essentially making it harder for unskilled migrants to
enter into the country, and emphasising the preference for scientists,
engineers, academics, etc. The issue, writes Zeit, is that
the law does not take into account the need for manual labour.
Traditionally, many Europeans (from the CEE countries especially) took
on the brunt of the work in the UK – which will now change in the
post-Brexit setting. The points system does not favour food sector
workers from Bulgaria or Romania, for example. They tend to dominate
the slaughterhouse industry - many had entered the country untrained,
having learned the necessary skills only once they began working. The
head of the British Meat Processors Association, Nick Allen, is
worried that the immigration law will make things difficult for the
industry because job turnover is high – leading to a need of new
workers every 3-4 years. Zeit mentions that out of 75,000
workers in British slaughterhouses, about 50,000 are from Eastern
Europe.
|
|
 |
Border Controls?
|
Having recently announced its first COVID-19 case in the
country, the Estonian government is planning to implement additional
controls at their border as a result of the spread of the virus,
reports ERR News. The minister of Social Affairs Tanel Kiik
announced that, though it would be virtually impossible to monitor
everyone who enters into the country, the government still hopes to
have ‘risk and case-based controls’. After having set up a task force
to tackle the issue at hand, the Estonians have found that it is not
(currently) a necessity to close their borders – only to screen those
coming from affected areas. ERR News also reports that the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs has ceased issuing Estonian tourist visas
to people in China and advises against travelling to risk areas. The
government officials have also mentioned that there may yet be
additional travel restrictions, but that consular services and the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs will continue be at the disposal of the
Estonian citizens.
|
|
 |
Seeking Aid
|
On a related note of border control and movement, Austrian
news agency Die Presse reports this week about a recent
development in the case of a 28-year old asylum seeker. Back in 2018,
an apprentice who had been working in Lustenau was deported to his
home country of Pakistan, on the grounds that he had come to Austria
illegally six years prior. The man was seeking asylum in the country
at the time, but the status was denied. Despite that, he had become
very well integrated into society, writes Die Presse. The man
presented a B1 language certificate and had an employment permit, not
to mention he had successfully completed his first year of
apprenticeship and had received a thousand letters of support. The
case had caused outrage in the state of Vorarlberg, with his
deportation and subsequent imprisonment in Pakistan under inhumane
conditions. Finally, Die Presse reports that it is now that
the Austrian Administrative Court has deemed the deportation illegal,
due to deficiencies in the asylum procedures, and that he is welcome
again in Austria.
|
|
|
|