The combined effects of the extended labor uncertainty, pandemic congestion, rising costs due to state and regional regulations, and the diversifying shift away from a reliance on China sourcing has seen a continuous erosion in the previous dominance of California as the nation’s leading trade gateway. California has seen its share of total US trade drop from over a fifth in 2004, to the current level of just over 15% and continuing to drop on a 12-month moving basis. Currently, the primary mitigating factor slowing this shift has been drought in Panama limiting the shift to trade routes through the
Canal.
Over the past few decades, economic development in California has taken two decidedly different tracks. Following the economic disruptions in the early 1990s, the Bay Area turned to tech and its higher wage jobs promoting an expansion in upper income households. Southern California in contrast developed its trade base, promoting instead middle-class wage jobs especially to blue collar households. The resulting outcomes have had profoundly different effects on income opportunities and the state’s professed interests in combating income inequality.
The recent ratification of the new West Coast labor agreement removes one barrier as the ports now turn to efforts to regain the lost market share that underpins this critical jobs and income base. The regulatory agencies, however, continue to throw up roadblocks, including state policies that push energy costs ever higher even as other state and local policies push greater electrification of port activities, and in the latest attempt which would impose a cap on
overall trade flows and the middle class wage jobs base in Southern California.
|