Journalist equipment seizures beyond Marion

View this email in your browser ([link removed])
Dear friend of press freedom,

Here are some of the most important stories we’re following from the U.S. and around the world. If you enjoy reading this newsletter, please forward it to friends and family. If someone has forwarded you this newsletter, please subscribe here ([link removed]) .

Sen. Lindsey Graham joins a growing bipartisan list of PRESS Act cosponsors. Gage Skidmore


** PRESS Act gets a bipartisan boost
------------------------------------------------------------

Sen. Lindsey Graham will reportedly ([link removed]) join Sens. Dick Durbin, Ron Wyden, and Mike Lee as a co-sponsor of the PRESS Act, the federal shield bill that protects journalists from government surveillance or being forced to name their confidential sources. The PRESS Act enjoys similar bipartisan support in the House ([link removed]) , with 10 Democrats and nine Republicans sponsoring.

We’ve explained before ([link removed]) why conservatives should support the PRESS Act, and lawmakers seem to agree. All Americans who value the Constitution, regardless of political affiliation or which media outlets they prefer, should recognize that a free and robust press is essential for our democracy to thrive.

With both the chair and the highest ranking Republican member of the Senate Judiciary Committee now on board, the PRESS Act’s chances of becoming law have increased significantly. Tell your ([link removed]) members of Congress to support this important protection for journalists, press freedom, and the public’s right to know.

Beyond Marion, police seize journalists’ equipment

Thanks in part to a national outcry, authorities (belatedly ([link removed]) ) returned the equipment they wrongfully seized from the Marion County Record. But other seizures of journalists’ equipment — ones that aren’t part of a shocking newsroom raid — often receive less attention and end with far worse outcomes.

We wrote on our blog ([link removed]) about three other examples of police taking journalists’ equipment and then refusing to return it. In each case — a photojournalist who had his camera and cellphone seized ([link removed]) while covering a protest, a newspaper whose laptop and editor’s cellphone were seized ([link removed]) for publishing audio provided by a source, and a freelance journalist whose handwritten notes were taken ([link removed]) from his pocket — police likely violated federal law.

When authorities refuse to return journalists’ equipment, even after the meritless charges against them have been dropped, it inhibits reporting. A photojournalist whose camera is seized and memory card “lost ([link removed]) ” can never publish the newsworthy pictures he took. When sensitive information contained on equipment falls into the hands of police, it undermines journalists’ ability to gather and report news in the future by chilling sources from speaking to reporters.

That’s why legal protections for journalists’ equipment aren’t limited to newsroom raids. Our outrage over police seizures shouldn’t be either.

Financial censorship harms press freedom

We’ve long warned of the dangers to free expression ([link removed]) when powerful financial institutions cut off journalists from using their services — whether we agree with the journalists’ point of view or not.

Now, another controversial publisher is facing a financial roadblock. According to The Dissenter ([link removed]) , GoFundMe recently halted a fundraiser for Grayzone, saying only that it needed to review the fundraiser for compliance with GoFundMe’s terms of service “[d]ue to some external concerns.”

We’re not here to defend Grayzone as a model of journalistic excellence or endorse the veracity of its reporting. But, as we explain on our blog ([link removed]) , we strongly object to a payment processor or fundraising site freezing out any publisher and then refusing to explain why. Do we want financial services companies, loyal only to their investors and with no particular interest in First Amendment freedoms, deciding which publishers should be able to pay the bills?


** What we’re reading
------------------------------------------------------------

Australian MPs to lobby US to drop Julian Assange prosecution or risk ‘very dangerous’ precedent for Russia and China ([link removed]) . Later this month, six Australian members of Parliament will visit the U.S. to warn authorities of the dangers to press freedom posed by Julian Assange’s potential extradition and trial on Espionage Act charges. As China, Russia and others use Assange’s prosecution to question the U.S.’s commitment to press freedom, the message of the Australian delegation is clear: Assange’s prosecution “is very dangerous for journalists around the world and a race to the bottom that’s going on.” It’s time for the Department of Justice to drop the Assange prosecution.

Photojournalists settle long fought case against the NYPD ([link removed]) . For years, the New York City Police Department has flagrantly violated the First Amendment rights of journalists (and many others). Now, the NYPD has settled a lawsuit ([link removed]) brought by five photojournalists who were attacked and arrested by officers during the racial justice protests of 2020. The settlement includes important protections for journalists documenting police activity at protests and elsewhere in public. It’s good to see a modicum of accountability, and we hope there's more to come.
Remembering Jeff German: A year after slaying, immeasurable impact of RJ reporter’s work lives on ([link removed]) . “Las Vegas Review-Journal investigative reporter Jeff German was murdered one year ago this weekend, and reverberations from the slaying are still felt throughout American journalism. Not only has the fatal stabbing been described by authorities as a violent act of retribution in response to reporting, but the criminal case poses a unique threat to the reporter shield law that allowed German to tell so many important stories for decades.”

Risk assessments can make journalism safer ([link removed]) . As risks to journalists’ security grow worldwide, news organizations should consider using risk assessments — formal or informal frameworks for identifying risks associated with a reporting project and mitigation measures. As Chief Information Security Officer and Director of Digital Security Harlo Holmes at Freedom of the Press Foundation (FPF) explains, a basic risk assessment “is really intuitive because it’s something we do already as part of our everyday life. It can even be fun.” Not sure where to start? Check out FPF’s resources on threat modeling ([link removed]) (part of our U.S. Journalism School Digital Security Curriculum ([link removed]) ).
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]

============================================================
Copyright © 2023 Freedom of the Press Foundation, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website.

Our mailing address is:
Freedom of the Press Foundation
49 Flatbush Ave, #1017
Brooklyn, NY 11217
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.