|
As the January 6th "fedsurrection" cases continue making a mockery of our legal system, two Pride Bois leaders were recently handed lengthy sentences for Seditious Conspiracy. Joe Biggs and Zach Rehl were sentenced to 17 and 15 years respectively, and this, we are to believe, was lenient, since prosecutors sought terrorism enhancements which the Judge appropriately rejected.
As this audience knows too well, your humble correspondent has also seen the business end of a Judge's gavel more than once in service to our cause. As we speak, hundreds of men await the pre-dawn raids to drag them back to Charlottesville, for the crime of carrying a Tiki Torch in the summer, more than half a decade ago. This month, my dear friend Ian Freeman will enter a federal district court to find out how much of the 70 years prosecutors seek to incarcerate him for will be granted. Ashley Podsaid-Sharp was recently sentenced to 8 years in Britain, for possessing a book.
Innocent men, one and all.
This occurs while actual criminals brag about murder and arson on social media platforms that supposedly ban "hateful conduct". It occurs while child sex predators drug and mutilate toddlers in the name of civil rights, and hold press conferences about it. It occurs while outright election theft is carried out before judges appointed by the victim, and a war drags on for the benefit of none but the crackhead son of the man who stole the election.
From these facts a man necessarily infers things about his environment and the threats therein.
For most, prison ranks second only to death in the hierarchy of disfavored outcomes. For a smaller number, perhaps second or third behind dishonor. Whatever the rank, only certain homosexuals prefer it to liberty, and so one seeks to avoid it.
But how does one go about this in an environment where innocent men are persecuted the most vigorously, and criminals are praised as heroes? In a world where good is evil, men are women, and anarchists riot to demand more government, one might infer that the best way to stay out of prison, is to commit a crime.
Were a man listening to this show to embark upon such a course he would likely find he was in error, and a grave error at that. Innocent men are persecuted not because they are innocent, but because they were to be persecuted one way or another, and evidence of a crime was not forthcoming to the persecutors. Were evidence of a crime to be found, this would only make easy the job of his persecutors. This happens often enough, and is considered for the most part unremarkable.
And so we might say that, to avoid prison, obedience to the law is a necessary though not sufficient component of one's behavior.
Then again, we might also note that obedience to the law does not always present as an option. In our environment we are denied the protections we are owed of the law. Denied this protection, lawlessness is the predictable outcome, which the persecutors observe joyfully. Upon observing our predictable response, we are held liable the predictable outcome. Just as predictably, those who victimize us brag about their crimes with no fear of repercussion.
From this one might infer that prison is a foregone conclusion, or at best a game of dice. Today you roll a six and you come home to your wife. Tomorrow you roll snake eyes and off to jail you go. "Them's the breaks" quoth Boris Johnson.
But this would hardly lead a man to prudent decision making. So, I have a great deal more to say about this when the Radical Agenda airs live this and every Friday at 9:30pm US Eastern on Odysee and the GetMeRadio App!
If you would like to help finance this high quality production, I try to make this easy enough to do....
Follow me elsewhere, listen, watch, and keep in touch...
|
