Member States have been negotiating a draft UN Cybercrime Treaty for over a year, with the intention of fostering international cooperation against cybercrime. This will facilitate the rewriting of criminal laws
around the world. But we are concerned that, in its current state, the treaty could criminalise online speech, expand cross-border surveillance, and undermine the privacy, freedom of expression, and fundamental rights of many – especially journalists, activists, and marginalised groups. With overbroad provisions, Article 13 of the treaty could be used to criminalise ‘written materials’ that describe harm to children, meaning great works of literature could be banned. It could also be used to criminalise
LGBTQ+ communities, as is already being done in Jordan and Uganda. It’s vital that the most vulnerable in our world are protected, but we have to do this in line with human rights standards. We can’t give further power to those authorities that already violate rights. That’s why, on 23 August, ARTICLE 19 and our allies briefed reporters (pictured above) about critical flaws in the treaty. Along with nearly 130 human rights organisations and experts, we are calling for the UN
to include strong human rights safeguards in the treaty. |