From Climate Leadership Council <[email protected]>
Subject Big Step Forward
Date February 25, 2020 6:24 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Dear Colleagues, On February 13, the Climate Leadership Council released its Bipartisan Climate Roadmap (linked here). It represents the culmination of three years of coalition and consensus building to lay the foundation for a much-needed bipartisan climate breakthrough. We also announced Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, Christiana Figueres and Ernest Moniz as new Founding Members. You may be particularly interested in the CEO and opinion leader quotes on pages iii and iv of the Roadmap, which highlight the breadth and depth of their support. On February 11, senior executives from 15 of the Fortune 100 companies in our coalition – along with Janet Yellen, Christine Todd Whitman and environmental CEOs – came to DC to brief a bipartisan group of 9 US Senators and other House Members about our plan. As you can see below, all this generated a good deal of favorable media coverage, including editorial board endorsements from the Washington Post and USA Today. If you read only one, we recommend the WP editorial board endorsement, pasted in full at the bottom of this email. Best regards, The Climate Leadership Council Team Summary of Coverage from Feb 13 Launch Washington Post Editorial Board: Democrats And Republicans Should Both Embrace This Common-sense, Planet-saving Reform USA Today Editorial Board: Climate change: Put a price on carbon pollution, then refund the money to consumers New York Times: U.S. Carbon Price Group Boosts Lobbying In Congress, Releases Plan Washington Post Feature: The Fastest Way To Cut Carbon Emissions Is A ‘fee’ And A Dividend, Top Leaders Say Financial Times: Wall Street Is Trying To Catch Up On Climate Change Washington Post (Fred Hiatt’s Column): How Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders both reject the reality of climate change Bloomberg: Corporate Chiefs, Janet Yellen Tout Carbon Tax Plan to Senators TIME: A Group of Big Businesses is Backing a Carbon Tax. Could It Be a Solution to Climate Change? NPR: Climate Leadership Council Washington Examiner: Banking Giants Goldman Sachs And JPMorgan Chase Join GOP-Led Carbon Tax Push Politico: Business Group Pushes New 'Climate Dividend' Plan Houston Chronicle: Corporations Push Carbon Tax Plan, Aiming To Cut Emissions In Half By 2035 Axios: Senators Huddle Over Dinner With Carbon-Tax Backers Roll Call: Yellen and an all-star, bipartisan coalition pitch carbon tax The Hill: Coalition plan seeks to cut carbon emissions in half by 2035 E&E News: Ernest Moniz, big banks back carbon tax group Democrats and Republicans should both embrace this common-sense, planet-saving reform By Editorial Board Feb. 13, 2020 CLIMATE CHANGE was the most important issue for a quarter of voters in the Democratic primary in New Hampshire on Tuesday; only health care ranked higher, according to exit polls. Every serious Democratic candidate has a plan. Even some Republican politicians, their science-denying president notwithstanding, are concluding that action on climate is essential for their political survival as well as the planet’s well-being. But what action? Sometimes we seem to face an unpalatable choice among President Trump’s obstruction and backsliding, feel-good Republican Band-Aids (let’s plant a few trees!) and the overweening, inefficient and ultimately unrealistic overreach of the Green New Deal. So there’s reason to celebrate the release Thursday of a climate plan by an alliance of corporations, environmental advocacy groups, economists and prominent citizens that bills itself as “the broadest climate coalition in U.S. history.” The coalition includes giant oil companies such as ConocoPhillips and ExxonMobil, utilities (Exelon) and car manufacturers (Ford, General Motors) but also the World Resources Institute, Conservation International and the World Wildlife Fund. It has luminaries from Republican administrations, including former secretaries of state James A. Baker III and George P. Shultz, and Democratic ones, such as Janet L. Yellen, President Barack Obama’s appointment as Federal Reserve chair, and Steven Chu, Mr. Obama’s energy secretary. What unites them is a plan that is more ambitious and effective in carbon reduction than Mr. Obama’s energy plan or the Paris accord; doesn’t increase the deficit by so much as a dime; leaves most Americans financially better off; encourages innovation; and provides an incentive for other emitters, including China and India, to act. How is that possible? The plan would levy a steadily rising tax on carbon (oil, gas, coal) to cut U.S. carbon emissions in half from 2005 levels by 2035. The timeline is aggressive — steep cuts, and soon — and there’s a backstop if they don’t materialize. Such a tax is the best way to promote innovation, Ms. Yellen told us, and encourage firms and consumers to switch to cleaner energy (though the government would still be wise to invest in research to speed the transition). The government would remit all of the tax receipts in equal shares; a family of four would get a $2,000 dividend check every year. Seventy percent of households would get more back than they would pay in higher energy costs, with the poorest faring best. Two other key features: The plan would impose a fee on imports from countries without comparable plans. That would keep companies from just moving factories to countries where they could emit more — and it would encourage other nations to join what would quickly become a customs union of lower emitters. And the carbon fee would replace most federal energy-sector regulation, though automobile standards, appliance efficiency regulation and state rules (if states so chose) would be retained. That deregulation will offend advocates who would rather dictate the mix of solar, wind and other renewables to be attained. But, as long as the price continues to rise, a tax is a more efficient, predictable route to wringing carbon out of the system than bureaucratic fiat could ever be. In short, the only reason for a Republican to oppose this plan is that there’s nothing here for a Democrat to dislike, and vice versa. Congress should find its way past that obstacle to embrace common-sense, planet-saving reform. Climate Leadership Council | [link removed] ‌ ‌ ‌ Climate Leadership Council | 1900 M St, Washington, DC 20036 Unsubscribe [email protected] Update Profile | About Constant Contact Sent by [email protected] in collaboration with Try email marketing for free today!
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis