To view this email as a web page, click here

.
AEI's weekly digest of top commentary and scholarship on the issues that matter most

­­Learning from the Past

The Art of Conversation and the Revival of the Humanities

August 26, 2023

“The academic humanities today resemble the medieval universities as the Renaissance humanists saw them: an entrenched and insular guild, more obstacle than venue for the flourishing of the intellectual life.” Benjamin Storey argues we may need to look beyond the institutional confines and discursive forms of modern universities to revive genuine intellectual life.

 

 

Before he joined the Supreme Court, Clarence Thomas wrote three eloquent essays on the Declaration of Independence, the 14th Amendment, and the Civil Rights Act. Adam J. White returns to this writing to illuminate the influences and themes that have shaped Justice Thomas’s jurisprudence of constitutional self-government.

 

The slow progress of the Ukrainian counteroffensive has generated increasing skepticism about the course of the war. But Frederick W. Kagan, writing with David Petraeus, explains why we would be wise to temper our pessimism about Ukrainian prospects: “This will be a long war, and we need Ukraine to prevail.”

 

Are Americans saving enough for retirement? Writing for the Wall Street Journal, Andrew G. Biggs breaks down the flawed methodology of a new, overly pessimistic report from the Government Accountability Office and provides his own answer to the question.

 

In an age of shortened attention spans and declining enrollments, does literature as an academic discipline have a future? Reviewing John Guillory’s Professing Criticism: Essays on the Organization of Literary Study (University of Chicago Press, 2022), Christopher J. Scalia surveys the state of the troubled field and argues literary studies must stop overpromising and under-delivering.

How Did Federal Aid to States and Localities Affect Testing and Vaccine Delivery?

The federal government provided almost $100 billion in aid to state and local governments for COVID-19 testing and vaccination throughout the pandemic. What impact did this aid have? In a new paper for the Journal of Public Economics, Stan Veuger, Philip G. Hoxie, John Kearns, and Jeffrey Clemens answer this question with an analysis of state and local testing and vaccination data. They find that federal aid had a significant impact on testing, with every additional $1,000 of federal aid per resident providing over 50,000 more tests per 100,000 people. However, it had a statistically negligible impact on vaccination totals, although aid may have helped increase access for disadvantaged groups. Their findings suggest that public subsidies during a public health emergency are best spent on goods and services with elastic demand, like tests.

 

 

More from AEI
RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY

Milwaukee’s “WOW” Counties and the Coming Battle for Wisconsin

Ruy Teixeira, Karlyn Bowman, and Nate Moore
AEIdeas

Russia’s and China’s Economic Eclipse Proves the US System Is Still the Best

Desmond Lachman
New York Post

Delusions of Détente

Michael Beckley
Foreign Affairs

A College Campus Is the Last Place That Should Promote a Culture of Wokeism

Samuel J. Abrams and Harvey Silverglate
Boston Globe

China’s March to Military Dominance

Dan Blumenthal
AEIdeas

PODCASTS AND VIDEOS

Perception vs. Reality: How Is the Ukrainian Counteroffensive Really Going?

Giselle Donnelly, Iulia Joja, and Mason Clark
The Eastern Front

Uncertainty and Technology: The Adaptability Imperative of Automation, Part II

Shane Tews and Brent Orrell
Explain to Shane

What Should I Read This Summer? Spies: The Epic Intelligence War Between East and West by Calder Walton

Danielle Pletka, Marc A. Thiessen, and Calder Walton
What the Hell Is Going On?

Mike Miles on the Houston Independent School District

Nat Malkus and Mike Miles
The Report Card with Nat Malkus

He Ain’t Heavy, He’s Brother George

Jonah Goldberg and Robert P. George
The Remnant with Jonah Goldberg

QUOTE OF THE WEEK

The debate over Amazon’s breakup should be examined through a lens of innovation and consumer choice. Amazon has thrived by introducing transformative technologies and fostering retail competition. Perhaps the FTC should defer to customers, as they determine the true economic value of Amazon’s services and innovations.

Mark Jamison