------=_Part_86593903_1461516146.1692975334613
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_86593907_1040117585.1692975334627"

------=_Part_86593907_1040117585.1692975334627
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

If you're having trouble viewing this email, you can see it online, https:/=
/api.neonemails.com/emails/content/wIZWr7MK1C9lfctjF8LMAjw8fVT69kS1DOyg0KM-=
AuE=3D.
*******OOPS!*********

In yesterday's message, I linked an analysis of the amendments from the Tex=
as Legislative Council. However, I accidentally linked the previous set of=
amendments instead of the current 2023 ballot propositions. Apologies for =
the error!

Here is the correct link to the current proposition analysis

*********************************************

Dear Citizen Advocates,

Fourteen Constitutional Amendments will be on our ballots on Nov. 7th in Te=
xas. These amendments are often worded strangely, and confusing, and have =
people scratching their heads wondering which way to vote. But no worries!=
TTP is here to help.

There are several sources you can use to find detailed information about th=
ese amendments. One is the Secretary of State=E2=80=99s Explanation of Con=
stitutional Amendments This is the =E2=80=9Cofficial=E2=80=9D explanation =
from the SOS about what the amendments mean, but no recommendations. Anothe=
r good source with voting recommendations is Texans For Fiscal Responsibili=
ty. Ballotpedia offers some good background information on each amendment,=
and The Texas Legislative Council gives deep dive details on each amendmen=
t (the government's official analysis). And if you'd like the liberal poin=
t of view on these amendments, just consult any Texas legacy media outlets,=
I'm sure they will have comments.

Bill Peacock, a consultant with Huffines Liberty Foundation, Texas Scorecar=
d, and formerly with Texas Public Policy Foundation, will be doing a presen=
tation on the amendments as they relate to budgets and spending in several =
TTP Satellites during September and October . Check the website calendar f=
or locations and dates of Bill's presentations.

I would urge everyone to take a close look at each amendment, study the ava=
ilable information from trusted resources, and then make an informed decisi=
on. But for now, here are my personal recommendations and personal comment=
s about the amendments. (Apologies in advance for any snarky remarks that =
may or may not be contained in this review.)

Some things you should know about first:


Texas has constitutional limits in place for growing state spending. Budge=
ts can only increase year over year by an amount equal to the inflation rat=
e and population growth. However, the legislature can override those limit=
s with a simple majority vote of both chambers. But it=E2=80=99s not a goo=
d look to impose spending limits on themselves and then turn around and bre=
ak the limits. Voters wouldn=E2=80=99t like that! So instead of busting t=
he spending limit, they took 7 items they wanted to spend money on, and mad=
e them constitutional amendments - off-budget. This way, they make the vot=
ers bust the spending limit so they don=E2=80=99t have to.

Of course, no one is telling you that you are busting the spending limits! =
You also need to know that even without busting the spending limits, the b=
udget that was passed for this biennium is 42% higher than the last one. I=
t=E2=80=99s the biggest spending increase in Texas history!

Here are the amendments. Choose wisely!

Proposition 1 =E2=80=93 HJR 126 "The constitutional amendment protecting th=
e right to engage in farming, ranching, timber production, horticulture, an=
d wildlife management."

Cost to Taxpayers: According to the TLO fiscal analysis, this amendment ha=
s no fiscal implications other than cost of publication.

The Author=E2=80=99s statement of intent for this amendment states: =E2=80=
=9CFarmers and ranchers who engage in production agriculture within municip=
al boundaries are being subjected to broad over regulation by municipal ord=
inances that prohibit and greatly restrict normal practices of agricultural=
operations, such as the raising and keeping of livestock, the production o=
f hay, and the cultivation of certain row crops. H.J.R. 126 seeks to addres=
s this issue and empower landowners in the state by constitutionally protec=
ting their right to engage in certain generally accepted agricultural pract=
ices on their own property.=E2=80=9D

The amendment does not prevent the legislature or authorized state agencies=
from regulating these activities for specific purposes in the future.

Vote Recommendation: NEUTRAL =E2=80=93 I see no reason to oppose this amen=
dment, it=E2=80=99s harmless, but I also don=E2=80=99t see why this had to =
be an amendment. Since when does growing food need to be constitutionally =
protected? If lawmakers were acting responsibly in the interest of all Tex=
ans, this would not be a problem. This is one of those amendments that see=
k to codify your God-given right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happin=
ess into the constitution. Just remember, "rights" granted by the governme=
nt can also be taken away by the government.

Proposition 2 =E2=80=93 SJR 64 "The constitutional amendment authorizing a =
local option exemption from ad valorem taxation by a county or municipality=
of all or part of the appraised value of real property used to operate a c=
hild-care facility."

Cost to Taxpayers: This amendment has no fiscal implications to the state =
other than the cost of publication. However, it does have fiscal implicatio=
ns for cities and counties who adopt the exemption.

This amendment allows cities and counties to exempt appraisal values of chi=
ldcare facilities from property taxes.

Vote Recommendation =E2=80=93 AGAINST =E2=80=93 exempting certain types of =
businesses from taxes puts a greater burden on the remaining taxpayers. Exe=
mptions like this have governments picking winners and losers. Government n=
eeds to stay out of the way!

Proposition 3 =E2=80=93 HJR 132 "The constitutional amendment prohibiting t=
he imposition of an individual wealth or net worth tax, including a tax on =
the difference between the assets and liabilities of an individual or famil=
y."

Cost to Taxpayers: According to the TLO fiscal analysis, this amendment ha=
s no fiscal implications other than cost of publication

This amendment will prevent the legislature from imposing wealth tax on ind=
ividuals or families (like California has done).=20

Vote Recommendation =E2=80=93 FOR =E2=80=93 we would always be opposed to a=
wealth tax. Texans are already taxed at every level of earning and spendi=
ng, and a wealth tax would be a tax on success. But this is another one of=
those things that has me asking "why do we need a constitutional amendment=
for this?"

Proposition 4 =E2=80=93 HJR 2 from the second special session "The constitu=
tional amendment to authorize the legislature to establish a temporary limi=
t on the maximum appraised value of real property other than a residence ho=
mestead for ad valorem tax purposes; to increase the amount of the exemptio=
n from ad valorem taxation by a school district applicable to residence hom=
esteads from $40,000 to $100,000; to adjust the amount of the limitation on=
school district ad valorem taxes imposed on the residence homesteads of th=
e elderly or disabled to reflect increases in certain exemption amounts; to=
except certain appropriations to pay for ad valorem tax relief from the co=
nstitutional limitation on the rate of growth of appropriations; and to aut=
horize the legislature to provide for a four-year term of office for a memb=
er of the board of directors of certain appraisal districts."

Cost to Taxpayers According to the TLO fiscal analysis, this amendment has =
no fiscal implications other than cost of publication. However, it does hav=
e fiscal implications for school boards.

This is the one from 2nd special session that is called =E2=80=9CThe Bigges=
t Tax Relief Bill in Texas History=E2=80=9D. (it isn=E2=80=99t!). It cont=
ains 4 parts: (1) temporary limit on appraisal value of non-homesteaded pr=
operties; (2) increase homestead exemptions for school taxes to $100,000;=
(3) exempt certain appropriations to pay for tax relief from the constitut=
ional growth limitation; and (4) authorizes the legislature to provide for =
a 4-year term of office for a member of the board of certain appraisal dist=
ricts.

Vote Recommendation =E2=80=93 FOR =E2=80=93 This =E2=80=9Cgiant=E2=80=9D ta=
x relief bill will provide very short-lived tax relief, which will quickly =
be eaten up by inflation, appraisal increases, and governments=E2=80=99 rel=
uctance to control spending and lower tax rates. But since some tax relief=
is better than none, so we recommend voting FOR. =20

Proposition 5 =E2=80=93 HJR 3 "The constitutional amendment relating to the=
Texas University Fund, which provides funding to certain institutions of h=
igher education to achieve national prominence as major research universiti=
es and drive the state economy."

Cost to Taxpayers: This amendment will cost $412 million the first year (t=
aken from the rainy-day fund), and then about $120 million per year after t=
hat.

This proposition is one of several that establish a =E2=80=9Cfund=E2=80=9D =
for some particular purpose, and keeps the spending off budget. To keep f=
rom breaking the spending limit, they=E2=80=99ve hidden that spending in th=
ese Constitutional Amendments, so they can tell voters they didn=E2=80=99t =
bust the spending limit.

Vote Recommendation =E2=80=93 AGAINST =E2=80=93 In addition to the sneaky n=
ature of these =E2=80=9Cfund=E2=80=9D amendments which is worth opposing, c=
onsider that we already fund higher education by billions each year, and th=
ey have become primarily leftist indoctrination meccas, so it=E2=80=99s a b=
ig NO for me.

Proposition 6 =E2=80=93 SJR 75 "The constitutional amendment creating the T=
exas water fund to assist in financing water projects in this state."

Cost to Taxpayers: This amendment will cost taxpayers $1 Billion.

This is another one of the =E2=80=9Cfund=E2=80=9D amendments that became an=
amendment so they wouldn=E2=80=99t have to show spending in the budget.

Vote Recommendation =E2=80=93 AGAINST =E2=80=93 see Proposition 5 above. P=
lus, the state is already spending money on financing water projects and no=
t solving the problem. This fund is socialistic and is government ownershi=
p of means of production. (Can you say "More Freedom, Less Government"?)

Proposition 7 =E2=80=93 SJR 93 "The constitutional amendment providing for =
the creation of the Texas energy fund to support the construction, maintena=
nce, modernization, and operation of electric generating facilities."

Cost to Taxpayers: This amendment will cost taxpayers $5 Billion.=20

Vote Recommendation =E2=80=93 AGAINST =E2=80=93 see Proposition 5 above. Th=
is fund would incentivize construction, maintenance, modernization, and ope=
ration of electric generating facilities. It provides loans and grants to =
electric generating companies. We already subsidize renewable and traditio=
nal electric generation with about $6 Billion per year.

Proposition 8 =E2=80=93 HJR 125 "The constitutional amendment creating the =
broadband infrastructure fund to expand high-speed broadband access and ass=
ist in the financing of connectivity projects."

Cost to Taxpayers: This amendment will cost taxpayers $1.5 Billion.

Vote Recommendation =E2=80=93 AGAINST =E2=80=93 obvious reasons, but see Pr=
oposition 5 above. Another =E2=80=9Cfund=E2=80=9D amendment, but this one i=
s flat out corporate welfare. Why should tax payers subsidize phone compan=
ies to expand service so the phone companies can turn around and make more =
money off the expanded service customers? Besides, Elon Musk is building s=
atellites as fast as you can say =E2=80=9Ctwitter is now X=E2=80=9D, that w=
ill cover the rural areas, so phone company internet is soon going to be ob=
solete. We lobbied against this legislation during the session as crony ca=
pitalism and government interference in markets.

Proposition 9 =E2=80=93 HJR 2, regular session "The constitutional amendmen=
t authorizing the 88th Legislature to provide a cost-of-living adjustment t=
o certain annuitants of the Teacher Retirement System of Texas."

Cost to Taxpayers: This amendment will cost taxpayers $5 Billion

Provides a cost-of-living adjustment to the teachers who are receiving reti=
rement benefits.

Vote Recommendation =E2=80=93 NEUTRAL =E2=80=93 Everyone likes teachers! I=
t=E2=80=99s hard to say no to helping them cope with inflation since they h=
ave not had a raise in several years. But it will cost the state billions.=
So you decide. Just know that if you vote against this amendment, it mean=
s that you hate teachers.

Proposition 10 =E2=80=93 SJR 87 "The constitutional amendment to authorize =
the legislature to exempt from ad valorem taxation equipment or inventory h=
eld by a manufacturer of medical or biomedical products to protect the Texa=
s healthcare network and strengthen our medical supply chain."

Cost to Taxpayers: This amendment will cost taxpayers $29 million in the f=
irst 2 years, then approximately $40 million annually.

Like proposition #2, this amendment grants property tax exemptions to a cer=
tain industry =E2=80=93 medical supply equipment.

Vote Recommendation =E2=80=93 AGAINST - exempting certain types of business=
es from taxes puts a greater burden on the remaining taxpayers. Exemptions=
like this have governments picking winners and losers.

Proposition 11 =E2=80=93 SJR 32 "The constitutional amendment authorizing t=
he legislature to permit conservation and reclamation districts in El Paso =
County to issue bonds supported by ad valorem taxes to fund the development=
and maintenance of parks and recreational facilities."

Cost to Taxpayers: According to the TLO fiscal analysis, this amendment ha=
s no fiscal impact to the state other than the cost of publication. It pot=
entially could have a financial impact on the citizens of El Paso County in=
the form of higher property taxes to support bonds.

How did this end up as a constitutional amendment? It feels like a local i=
ssue. But in 2003, the constitution was amended, giving conservation & rec=
lamation districts in certain counties the ability to issue bonds for parks=
and recreation. El Paso was not included, so this amendment adds El Paso =
County to the counties enumerated in the legislation.

Vote Recommendation =E2=80=93 AGAINST =E2=80=93 we generally oppose all bon=
ds, and this amendment would provide additional capacity for El Paso County=
to increase taxes to fund parks and recreation facilities with new bonds. =
Texans are taxed enough already. Even in El Paso County!

Proposition 12 =E2=80=93 HJR 134 "The constitutional amendment providing fo=
r the abolition of the office of county treasurer in Galveston County."

Cost to Taxpayers: According to the TLO fiscal analysis, this amendment ha=
s no fiscal impact for the State. Galveston County anticipates savings if =
the amendment passes. =20

This amendment would abolish the position of County Treasurer in Galveston =
County, which was requested by the current County Treasurer of Galveston Co=
unty in the last campaign. In order for the amendment to pass, it needs no=
t only a majority vote of the whole State, but also a majority vote in Galv=
eston County.

Vote Recommendation =E2=80=93 NEUTRAL =E2=80=93 The current Treasurer campa=
igned on a promise to eliminate his position, which prompted this legislati=
ve action. Since one less government position means less government, it=E2=
=80=99s probably a good thing. So, my position is NEUTRAL, leaning towards=
FOR. (If I lived in Galveston County, this would be a total FOR)

Proposition 13 =E2=80=93 HJR 107 "The constitutional amendment to increase =
the mandatory age of retirement for state justices and judges."

Cost to Taxpayers: Indeterminate, since we cannot know how many judges wou=
ld elect to serve longer.

This amendment raises the current mandatory retirement age for State Justic=
es and Judges from 75 to 79.

Vote Recommendation =E2=80=93 I DON=E2=80=99T KNOW! =E2=80=93 This is a har=
d one for me. While it=E2=80=99s nice to take advantage of the collective =
wisdom of the older judges, there is the risk of aging issues affecting the=
judicial system. The State could benefit from new, younger candidates, s=
o I=E2=80=99ll leave this one as NEUTRAL (because I can=E2=80=99t make up m=
y mind! You decide.)

Proposition 14 =E2=80=93 SJR 74 "The constitutional amendment providing for=
the creation of the centennial parks conservation fund to be used for the =
creation and improvement of state parks."

Cost to Taxpayers: This amendment will cost taxpayers $1 Billion

Another =E2=80=9Cfund=E2=80=9D amendment so I=E2=80=99ll refer you to =E2=
=80=9Cfund=E2=80=9D amendment comments above.

Vote Recommendation =E2=80=93 NO =E2=80=93 enough said.

=20

Here's what Bill Peacock has to say about the 7 "fund" amendments:

None of these amendments would do much, if anything, to solve problems we a=
re facing or improve the Texas economy. They are simply corporate welfare, =
with a little university welfare thrown in, designed to deceive voters into=
thinking they are serious solutions to our problems. Also, in almost every=
case, the Legislature is telling us they don=E2=80=99t trust markets=E2=80=
=93and the people in them=E2=80=93to work out solutions to our problems; th=
ey will fix the problems for us. Additionally, they take all this money out=
from underneath the constitutional limit on spending growth. It is just a =
free pass for the Legislature to spend our money.

=20

Not only are these constitutional amendments greatly flawed, but they also =
will take out of circulation close to $12 billion Texas could use to buy do=
wn the property tax. That would double the amount the Legislature is likely=
to provide this year.

=20

We appreciate this information provided by Bill Peacock, and we encourage T=
rue Texans to vote wisely.

=20

That's all for now - stay informed, and stay engaged!

For Texas always,

Fran Rhodes, President

PS: Something to note - on all of the amendments that have "no fiscal impa=
ct beyond cost of publication" the fiscal analysis has the cost of publicat=
ion at $204,406 per amendment. Does that mean that all of these amendments=
pass, the total cost of publication would be $2,861,684? I don't do math =
=F0=9F=98=8A but if that's right, it might be reason enough to vote AGAINST=
!

*******OOPS!*********

In yesterday's message, I linked an analysis of the amendments from the Tex=
as Legislative Council. However, I accidentally linked the previous set of=
amendments from 2021, instead of the current 2023 ballot propositions. Apo=
logies for the error!

Here is the correct link to the current proposition analysis

*********************************************

Dear Citizen Advocates,

Fourteen Constitutional Amendments will be on our ballots on Nov. 7th in Te=
xas. These amendments are often worded strangely, and confusing, and have =
people scratching their heads wondering which way to vote. But no worries!=
TTP is here to help.

There are several sources you can use to find detailed information about th=
ese amendments. One is the Secretary of State=E2=80=99s Explanation of Con=
stitutional Amendments This is the =E2=80=9Cofficial=E2=80=9D explanation =
from the SOS about what the amendments mean, but no recommendations. Anothe=
r good source with voting recommendations is Texans For Fiscal Responsibili=
ty. Ballotpedia offers some good background information on each amendment,=
and The Texas Legislative Council gives deep dive details on each amendmen=
t (the government's official analysis). And if you'd like the liberal poin=
t of view on these amendments, just consult any Texas legacy media outlets,=
I'm sure they will have comments.

Bill Peacock, a consultant with Huffines Liberty Foundation, Texas Scorecar=
d, and formerly with Texas Public Policy Foundation, will be doing a presen=
tation on the amendments as they relate to budgets and spending in several =
TTP Satellites during September and October . Check the website calendar f=
or locations and dates of Bill's presentations.

I would urge everyone to take a close look at each amendment, study the ava=
ilable information from trusted resources, and then make an informed decisi=
on. But for now, here are my personal recommendations and personal comment=
s about the amendments. (Apologies in advance for any snarky remarks that =
may or may not be contained in this review.)

Some things you should know about first:


Texas has constitutional limits in place for growing state spending. Budge=
ts can only increase year over year by an amount equal to the inflation rat=
e and population growth. However, the legislature can override those limit=
s with a simple majority vote of both chambers. But it=E2=80=99s not a goo=
d look to impose spending limits on themselves and then turn around and bre=
ak the limits. Voters wouldn=E2=80=99t like that! So instead of busting t=
he spending limit, they took 7 items they wanted to spend money on, and mad=
e them constitutional amendments - off-budget. This way, they make the vot=
ers bust the spending limit so they don=E2=80=99t have to.

Of course, no one is telling you that you are busting the spending limits! =
You also need to know that even without busting the spending limits, the b=
udget that was passed for this biennium is 42% higher than the last one. I=
t=E2=80=99s the biggest spending increase in Texas history!

Here are the amendments. Choose wisely!

Proposition 1 =E2=80=93 HJR 126 "The constitutional amendment protecting th=
e right to engage in farming, ranching, timber production, horticulture, an=
d wildlife management."

Cost to Taxpayers: According to the TLO fiscal analysis, this amendment ha=
s no fiscal implications other than cost of publication.

The Author=E2=80=99s statement of intent for this amendment states: =E2=80=
=9CFarmers and ranchers who engage in production agriculture within municip=
al boundaries are being subjected to broad over regulation by municipal ord=
inances that prohibit and greatly restrict normal practices of agricultural=
operations, such as the raising and keeping of livestock, the production o=
f hay, and the cultivation of certain row crops. H.J.R. 126 seeks to addres=
s this issue and empower landowners in the state by constitutionally protec=
ting their right to engage in certain generally accepted agricultural pract=
ices on their own property.=E2=80=9D

The amendment does not prevent the legislature or authorized state agencies=
from regulating these activities for specific purposes in the future.

Vote Recommendation: NEUTRAL =E2=80=93 I see no reason to oppose this amen=
dment, it=E2=80=99s harmless, but I also don=E2=80=99t see why this had to =
be an amendment. Since when does growing food need to be constitutionally =
protected? If lawmakers were acting responsibly in the interest of all Tex=
ans, this would not be a problem. This is one of those amendments that see=
k to codify your God-given right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happin=
ess into the constitution. Just remember, "rights" granted by the governme=
nt can also be taken away by the government.

Proposition 2 =E2=80=93 SJR 64 "The constitutional amendment authorizing a =
local option exemption from ad valorem taxation by a county or municipality=
of all or part of the appraised value of real property used to operate a c=
hild-care facility."

Cost to Taxpayers: This amendment has no fiscal implications to the state =
other than the cost of publication. However, it does have fiscal implicatio=
ns for cities and counties who adopt the exemption.

This amendment allows cities and counties to exempt appraisal values of chi=
ldcare facilities from property taxes.

Vote Recommendation =E2=80=93 AGAINST =E2=80=93 exempting certain types of =
businesses from taxes puts a greater burden on the remaining taxpayers. Exe=
mptions like this have governments picking winners and losers. Government n=
eeds to stay out of the way!

Proposition 3 =E2=80=93 HJR 132 "The constitutional amendment prohibiting t=
he imposition of an individual wealth or net worth tax, including a tax on =
the difference between the assets and liabilities of an individual or famil=
y."

Cost to Taxpayers: According to the TLO fiscal analysis, this amendment ha=
s no fiscal implications other than cost of publication

This amendment will prevent the legislature from imposing wealth tax on ind=
ividuals or families (like California has done).=20

Vote Recommendation =E2=80=93 FOR =E2=80=93 we would always be opposed to a=
wealth tax. Texans are already taxed at every level of earning and spendi=
ng, and a wealth tax would be a tax on success. But this is another one of=
those things that has me asking "why do we need a constitutional amendment=
for this?"

Proposition 4 =E2=80=93 HJR 2 from the second special session "The constitu=
tional amendment to authorize the legislature to establish a temporary limi=
t on the maximum appraised value of real property other than a residence ho=
mestead for ad valorem tax purposes; to increase the amount of the exemptio=
n from ad valorem taxation by a school district applicable to residence hom=
esteads from $40,000 to $100,000; to adjust the amount of the limitation on=
school district ad valorem taxes imposed on the residence homesteads of th=
e elderly or disabled to reflect increases in certain exemption amounts; to=
except certain appropriations to pay for ad valorem tax relief from the co=
nstitutional limitation on the rate of growth of appropriations; and to aut=
horize the legislature to provide for a four-year term of office for a memb=
er of the board of directors of certain appraisal districts."

Cost to Taxpayers According to the TLO fiscal analysis, this amendment has =
no fiscal implications other than cost of publication. However, it does hav=
e fiscal implications for school boards.

This is the one from 2nd special session that is called =E2=80=9CThe Bigges=
t Tax Relief Bill in Texas History=E2=80=9D. (it isn=E2=80=99t!). It cont=
ains 4 parts: (1) temporary limit on appraisal value of non-homesteaded pr=
operties; (2) increase homestead exemptions for school taxes to $100,000;=
(3) exempt certain appropriations to pay for tax relief from the constitut=
ional growth limitation; and (4) authorizes the legislature to provide for =
a 4-year term of office for a member of the board of certain appraisal dist=
ricts.

Vote Recommendation =E2=80=93 FOR =E2=80=93 This =E2=80=9Cgiant=E2=80=9D ta=
x relief bill will provide very short-lived tax relief, which will quickly =
be eaten up by inflation, appraisal increases, and governments=E2=80=99 rel=
uctance to control spending and lower tax rates. But since some tax relief=
is better than none, so we recommend voting FOR. =20

Proposition 5 =E2=80=93 HJR 3 "The constitutional amendment relating to the=
Texas University Fund, which provides funding to certain institutions of h=
igher education to achieve national prominence as major research universiti=
es and drive the state economy."

Cost to Taxpayers: This amendment will cost $412 million the first year (t=
aken from the rainy-day fund), and then about $120 million per year after t=
hat.

This proposition is one of several that establish a =E2=80=9Cfund=E2=80=9D =
for some particular purpose, and keeps the spending off budget. To keep f=
rom breaking the spending limit, they=E2=80=99ve hidden that spending in th=
ese Constitutional Amendments, so they can tell voters they didn=E2=80=99t =
bust the spending limit.

Vote Recommendation =E2=80=93 AGAINST =E2=80=93 In addition to the sneaky n=
ature of these =E2=80=9Cfund=E2=80=9D amendments which is worth opposing, c=
onsider that we already fund higher education by billions each year, and th=
ey have become primarily leftist indoctrination meccas, so it=E2=80=99s a b=
ig NO for me.

Proposition 6 =E2=80=93 SJR 75 "The constitutional amendment creating the T=
exas water fund to assist in financing water projects in this state."

Cost to Taxpayers: This amendment will cost taxpayers $1 Billion.

This is another one of the =E2=80=9Cfund=E2=80=9D amendments that became an=
amendment so they wouldn=E2=80=99t have to show spending in the budget.

Vote Recommendation =E2=80=93 AGAINST =E2=80=93 see Proposition 5 above. P=
lus, the state is already spending money on financing water projects and no=
t solving the problem. This fund is socialistic and is government ownershi=
p of means of production. (Can you say "More Freedom, Less Government"?)

Proposition 7 =E2=80=93 SJR 93 "The constitutional amendment providing for =
the creation of the Texas energy fund to support the construction, maintena=
nce, modernization, and operation of electric generating facilities."

Cost to Taxpayers: This amendment will cost taxpayers $5 Billion.=20

Vote Recommendation =E2=80=93 AGAINST =E2=80=93 see Proposition 5 above. Th=
is fund would incentivize construction, maintenance, modernization, and ope=
ration of electric generating facilities. It provides loans and grants to =
electric generating companies. We already subsidize renewable and traditio=
nal electric generation with about $6 Billion per year.

Proposition 8 =E2=80=93 HJR 125 "The constitutional amendment creating the =
broadband infrastructure fund to expand high-speed broadband access and ass=
ist in the financing of connectivity projects."

Cost to Taxpayers: This amendment will cost taxpayers $1.5 Billion.

Vote Recommendation =E2=80=93 AGAINST =E2=80=93 obvious reasons, but see Pr=
oposition 5 above. Another =E2=80=9Cfund=E2=80=9D amendment, but this one i=
s flat out corporate welfare. Why should tax payers subsidize phone compan=
ies to expand service so the phone companies can turn around and make more =
money off the expanded service customers? Besides, Elon Musk is building s=
atellites as fast as you can say =E2=80=9Ctwitter is now X=E2=80=9D, that w=
ill cover the rural areas, so phone company internet is soon going to be ob=
solete. We lobbied against this legislation during the session as crony ca=
pitalism and government interference in markets.

Proposition 9 =E2=80=93 HJR 2, regular session "The constitutional amendmen=
t authorizing the 88th Legislature to provide a cost-of-living adjustment t=
o certain annuitants of the Teacher Retirement System of Texas."

Cost to Taxpayers: This amendment will cost taxpayers $5 Billion

Provides a cost-of-living adjustment to the teachers who are receiving reti=
rement benefits.

Vote Recommendation =E2=80=93 NEUTRAL =E2=80=93 Everyone likes teachers! I=
t=E2=80=99s hard to say no to helping them cope with inflation since they h=
ave not had a raise in several years. But it will cost the state billions.=
So you decide. Just know that if you vote against this amendment, it mean=
s that you hate teachers.

Proposition 10 =E2=80=93 SJR 87 "The constitutional amendment to authorize =
the legislature to exempt from ad valorem taxation equipment or inventory h=
eld by a manufacturer of medical or biomedical products to protect the Texa=
s healthcare network and strengthen our medical supply chain."

Cost to Taxpayers: This amendment will cost taxpayers $29 million in the f=
irst 2 years, then approximately $40 million annually.

Like proposition #2, this amendment grants property tax exemptions to a cer=
tain industry =E2=80=93 medical supply equipment.

Vote Recommendation =E2=80=93 AGAINST - exempting certain types of business=
es from taxes puts a greater burden on the remaining taxpayers. Exemptions=
like this have governments picking winners and losers.

Proposition 11 =E2=80=93 SJR 32 "The constitutional amendment authorizing t=
he legislature to permit conservation and reclamation districts in El Paso =
County to issue bonds supported by ad valorem taxes to fund the development=
and maintenance of parks and recreational facilities."

Cost to Taxpayers: According to the TLO fiscal analysis, this amendment ha=
s no fiscal impact to the state other than the cost of publication. It pot=
entially could have a financial impact on the citizens of El Paso County in=
the form of higher property taxes to support bonds.

How did this end up as a constitutional amendment? It feels like a local i=
ssue. But in 2003, the constitution was amended, giving conservation & rec=
lamation districts in certain counties the ability to issue bonds for parks=
and recreation. El Paso was not included, so this amendment adds El Paso =
County to the counties enumerated in the legislation.

Vote Recommendation =E2=80=93 AGAINST =E2=80=93 we generally oppose all bon=
ds, and this amendment would provide additional capacity for El Paso County=
to increase taxes to fund parks and recreation facilities with new bonds. =
Texans are taxed enough already. Even in El Paso County!

Proposition 12 =E2=80=93 HJR 134 "The constitutional amendment providing fo=
r the abolition of the office of county treasurer in Galveston County."

Cost to Taxpayers: According to the TLO fiscal analysis, this amendment ha=
s no fiscal impact for the State. Galveston County anticipates savings if =
the amendment passes. =20

This amendment would abolish the position of County Treasurer in Galveston =
County, which was requested by the current County Treasurer of Galveston Co=
unty in the last campaign. In order for the amendment to pass, it needs no=
t only a majority vote of the whole State, but also a majority vote in Galv=
eston County.

Vote Recommendation =E2=80=93 NEUTRAL =E2=80=93 The current Treasurer campa=
igned on a promise to eliminate his position, which prompted this legislati=
ve action. Since one less government position means less government, it=E2=
=80=99s probably a good thing. So, my position is NEUTRAL, leaning towards=
FOR. (If I lived in Galveston County, this would be a total FOR)

Proposition 13 =E2=80=93 HJR 107 "The constitutional amendment to increase =
the mandatory age of retirement for state justices and judges."

Cost to Taxpayers: Indeterminate, since we cannot know how many judges wou=
ld elect to serve longer.

This amendment raises the current mandatory retirement age for State Justic=
es and Judges from 75 to 79.

Vote Recommendation =E2=80=93 I DON=E2=80=99T KNOW! =E2=80=93 This is a har=
d one for me. While it=E2=80=99s nice to take advantage of the collective =
wisdom of the older judges, there is the risk of aging issues affecting the=
judicial system. The State could benefit from new, younger candidates, s=
o I=E2=80=99ll leave this one as NEUTRAL (because I can=E2=80=99t make up m=
y mind! You decide.)

Proposition 14 =E2=80=93 SJR 74 "The constitutional amendment providing for=
the creation of the centennial parks conservation fund to be used for the =
creation and improvement of state parks."

Cost to Taxpayers: This amendment will cost taxpayers $1 Billion

Another =E2=80=9Cfund=E2=80=9D amendment so I=E2=80=99ll refer you to =E2=
=80=9Cfund=E2=80=9D amendment comments above.

Vote Recommendation =E2=80=93 NO =E2=80=93 enough said.

=20

Here's what Bill Peacock has to say about the 7 "fund" amendments:

None of these amendments would do much, if anything, to solve problems we a=
re facing or improve the Texas economy. They are simply corporate welfare, =
with a little university welfare thrown in, designed to deceive voters into=
thinking they are serious solutions to our problems. Also, in almost every=
case, the Legislature is telling us they don=E2=80=99t trust markets=E2=80=
=93and the people in them=E2=80=93to work out solutions to our problems; th=
ey will fix the problems for us. Additionally, they take all this money out=
from underneath the constitutional limit on spending growth. It is just a =
free pass for the Legislature to spend our money.

=20

Not only are these constitutional amendments greatly flawed, but they also =
will take out of circulation close to $12 billion Texas could use to buy do=
wn the property tax. That would double the amount the Legislature is likely=
to provide this year.

=20

We appreciate this information provided by Bill Peacock, and we encourage T=
rue Texans to vote wisely.

=20

That's all for now - stay informed, and stay engaged!

For Texas always,

Fran Rhodes, President

PS: Something to note - on all of the amendments that have "no fiscal impa=
ct beyond cost of publication" the fiscal analysis has the cost of publicat=
ion at $204,406 per amendment. Does that mean that all of these amendments=
pass, the total cost of publication would be $2,861,684? I don't do math =
=F0=9F=98=8A but if that's right, it might be reason enough to vote AGAINST=
!

=20

True Texas Project works hard to train and engage activists.
Can you help?
We are 100% donation-based.
Click here to donate to our cause. =20

=20

=20

Tired of getting so many emails? Please be patient!


We put the location in the subject of every event email so that you can eas=
ily delete without opening it, but you know what is a better idea? Forward=
the event to those you know in that area! We send all event emails to all=
subscribers because so many True Texans do just that... share the invites!=
We hope you will too, but if not, kindly just delete. No need to send in=
a complaint or unsubscribe. There truly is a method to our madness as we =
work hard to build the army across this great big state! Sometimes we send=
emails only to specific counties. If you want to update what counties are=
on your profile, please click here.
BONUS TIP: remove the "unsubscribe" line at the bottom of your email before=
you forward it! Otherwise the recipient may unsubscribe YOU!

=20

True Texas Project works hard to train and engage activists.
Can you help?
We are 100% donation-based.
Click here to donate to our cause. =20

=20

=20

Tired of getting so many emails? Please be patient!


We put the location in the subject of every event email so that you can eas=
ily delete without opening it, but you know what is a better idea? Forward=
the event to those you know in that area! We send all event emails to all=
subscribers because so many True Texans do just that... share the invites!=
We hope you will too, but if not, kindly just delete. No need to send in=
a complaint or unsubscribe. There truly is a method to our madness as we =
work hard to build the army across this great big state! Sometimes we send=
emails only to specific counties. If you want to update what counties are=
on your profile, please click here.
BONUS TIP: remove the "unsubscribe" line at the bottom of your email before=
you forward it! Otherwise the recipient may unsubscribe YOU!

This email was sent to [email protected]. Click here to [link removed]
exasproject.app.neoncrm.com/np/clients/truetexasproject/unsubscribeEmail.js=
p?type=3D16&emailId=3Dfbea7eb7441e511e9ebb528c2c105caafm3130885fbe&userId=
=3DYZi1e6b19XtjIQH1mOL5vJCgQrydoB4Fs6tE2c-j8A4%3D.
------=_Part_86593907_1040117585.1692975334627
Content-Type: text/html;charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "[link removed]
g/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html xmlns=3D"[link removed]">=20
<head>=20
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dutf-8">=
=20
<meta name=3D"viewport" content=3D"width=3Ddevice-width"> <!--[if !mso]><=
!-->=20
<link href=3D"[link removed]" rel=3D"styl=
esheet" type=3D"text/css">=20
<link href=3D"[link removed]" rel=
=3D"stylesheet" type=3D"text/css">=20
<link href=3D"[link removed]" rel=3D=
"stylesheet" type=3D"text/css">=20
<link href=3D"[link removed]" =
rel=3D"stylesheet" type=3D"text/css">=20
<link href=3D"[link removed]" rel=3D"st=
ylesheet" type=3D"text/css"> <!--<![endif]--> <!--[if mso]>
<style type=3D"text/css">
@import url('[link removed]');
@import url('[link removed]
');
@import url('[link removed]'=
);
@import url('[link removed]');
@import url('[link removed]
s+Pro');
</style>
<![end-if]-->=20
<style type=3D"text/css">
@media only screen and (max-width:596px) {
html {
min-height: 100%;
background: #FFFFFF;
}

.small-float-center {
margin: 0 auto !important;
Margin: 0 auto !important;
float: none !important;
}

.small-float-center,
.small-text-center {
text-align: center !important;
}

.small-text-left {
text-align: left !important;
}

.small-text-right {
text-align: right !important;
}

.hide-for-large {
display: block !important;
width: auto !important;
overflow: visible !important;
max-height: none !important;
font-size: inherit !important;
line-height: inherit !important;
}

table.body table.container .hide-for-large,
table.body table.container .row.hide-for-large {
display: table !important;
width: 100% !important;
}

table.body table.container .callout-inner.hide-for-large {
display: table-cell !important;
width: 100% !important;
}

table.body table.container .show-for-large {
display: none !important;
width: 0;
mso-hide: all;
overflow: hidden;
}

a[x-apple-data-detectors] {
color: inherit !important;
text-decoration: none !important;
font-size: inherit !important;
font-family: inherit !important;
font-weight: inherit !important;
line-height: inherit !important;
}

.menu.small-vertical .menu-item {
padding-left: 0 !important;
padding-right: 0 !important;
}

table.body img {
height: auto;
max-width: 100%;
}

table.body center {
min-width: 0 !important;
}

table.body .container {
width: 95% !important;
}

table.body .column,
table.body .columns {
height: auto !important;
-moz-box-sizing: border-box;
-webkit-box-sizing: border-box;
box-sizing: border-box;
padding-left: 24px !important;
padding-right: 24px !important;
}

table.body .collapse .column,
table.body .collapse .columns,
table.body .column .column,
table.body .column .columns,
table.body .columns .column,
table.body .columns .columns {
padding-left: 0 !important;
padding-right: 0 !important;
}

td.small-1,
th.small-1 {
display: inline-block !important;
width: 8.33333% !important;
}

td.small-2,
th.small-2 {
display: inline-block !important;
width: 16.66667% !important;
}

td.small-3,
th.small-3 {
display: inline-block !important;
width: 25% !important;
}

td.small-4,
th.small-4 {
display: inline-block !important;
width: 33.33333% !important;
}

td.small-5,
th.small-5 {
display: inline-block !important;
width: 41.66667% !important;
}

td.small-6,
th.small-6 {
display: inline-block !important;
width: 50% !important;
}

td.small-7,
th.small-7 {
display: inline-block !important;
width: 58.33333% !important;
}

td.small-8,
th.small-8 {
display: inline-block !important;
width: 66.66667% !important;
}

td.small-9,
th.small-9 {
display: inline-block !important;
width: 75% !important;
}

td.small-10,
th.small-10 {
display: inline-block !important;
width: 83.33333% !important;
}

td.small-11,
th.small-11 {
display: inline-block !important;
width: 91.66667% !important;
}

td.small-12,
th.small-12 {
display: inline-block !important;
width: 100% !important;
}

td.small-12.divider,
th.small-12.divider {
display: block !important;
}

.columns td.small-12,
.columns th.small-12,
.column td.small-12,
.column th.small-12 {
display: block !important;
width: 100% !important;
}

table.body td.small-offset-1,
table.body th.small-offset-1 {
margin-left: 8.33333% !important;
Margin-left: 8.33333% !important;
}

table.body td.small-offset-2,
table.body th.small-offset-2 {
margin-left: 16.66667% !important;
Margin-left: 16.66667% !important;
}

table.body td.small-offset-3,
table.body th.small-offset-3 {
margin-left: 25% !important;
Margin-left: 25% !important;
}

table.body td.small-offset-4,
table.body th.small-offset-4 {
margin-left: 33.33333% !important;
Margin-left: 33.33333% !important;
}

table.body td.small-offset-5,
table.body th.small-offset-5 {
margin-left: 41.66667% !important;
Margin-left: 41.66667% !important;
}

table.body td.small-offset-6,
table.body th.small-offset-6 {
margin-left: 50% !important;
Margin-left: 50% !important;
}

table.body td.small-offset-7,
table.body th.small-offset-7 {
margin-left: 58.33333% !important;
Margin-left: 58.33333% !important;
}

table.body td.small-offset-8,
table.body th.small-offset-8 {
margin-left: 66.66667% !important;
Margin-left: 66.66667% !important;
}

table.body td.small-offset-9,
table.body th.small-offset-9 {
margin-left: 75% !important;
Margin-left: 75% !important;
}

table.body td.small-offset-10,
table.body th.small-offset-10 {
margin-left: 83.33333% !important;
Margin-left: 83.33333% !important;
}

table.body td.small-offset-11,
table.body th.small-offset-11 {
margin-left: 91.66667% !important;
Margin-left: 91.66667% !important;
}

table.body table.columns td.expander,
table.body table.columns th.expander {
display: none !important;
}

table.body .right-text-pad,
table.body .text-pad-right {
padding-left: 10px !important;
}

table.body .left-text-pad,
table.body .text-pad-left {
padding-right: 10px !important;
}

table.menu {
width: 100% !important;
}

table.menu td,
table.menu th {
width: auto !important;
display: inline-block !important;
}

table.menu.small-vertical td,
table.menu.small-vertical th,
table.menu.vertical td,
table.menu.vertical th {
display: block !important;
}

table.menu[align=3Dcenter] {
width: auto !important;
}

table.button.small-expand,
table.button.small-expanded {
width: 100% !important;
}

table.button.small-expanded table,
table.button.small-expand table {
width: 100%;
}

table.button.small-expanded table a,
table.button.small-expand table a {
text-align: center !important;
width: 100% !important;
padding-left: 0 !important;
padding-right: 0 !important;
}

table.button.small-expand center,
table.button.small-expanded center {
min-width: 0;
}
.titan__email-divider {
height: 1px !important;
}
}
</style> <!--[if gte mso 9]>
<style type=3D"text/css">
li {
text-indent: -1em; /* Normalise space between bullets and text =
*/
}
</style>
<![endif]-->=20
</head>=20
<body style=3D"min-width: 100%; -webkit-text-size-adjust: 100%; -ms-text-s=
ize-adjust: 100%; -moz-box-sizing: border-box; -webkit-box-sizing: border-b=
ox; box-sizing: border-box; color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sa=
ns-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: l=
eft; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; width: 100%;"> <!--[if !gte mso 9]>=
<!--><span style=3D"display:none !important; font-size:0px; line-height:0px=
; max-height:0px; max-width:0px; opacity:0; overflow:hidden; visibility:hid=
den; mso-hide:all;"><!--NEONCRM-PREVIEW-TEXT-START---->Correcting one of th=
e links<!--NEONCRM-PREVIEW-TEXT-END-----></span> <!--<![endif]-->=20
<table class=3D"body" style=3D"border-spacing: 0; border-collapse: collap=
se; vertical-align: top; background: #fff; height: 100%; width: 100%; color=
: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; paddi=
ng: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; font-size: 12pt; line-height=
: 1.5; background-color: #FFFFFF;">=20
<tbody>
<tr style=3D"padding: 0; vertical-align: top; text-align: left;">=20
<td class=3D"float-center" align=3D"center" valign=3D"top" style=3D"wo=
rd-wrap: break-word; vertical-align: top; color: #3c4144; font-family: aria=
l,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; font-size: 12pt; line=
-height: 1.5; margin: 0 auto; Margin: 0 auto; float: none; text-align: cent=
er; border-collapse: collapse;">=20
<center style=3D"min-width: 540px; width: 100%;">=20
<table class=3D"container" width=3D"600" style=3D"border-spacing: 0;=
border-collapse: collapse; padding: 0; vertical-align: top; background: #f=
efefe; width: 600px; margin: 0 auto; Margin: 0 auto; text-align: inherit; b=
ackground-color: #FFFFFF;">=20
<tbody>
<tr style=3D"padding: 0; vertical-align: top; text-align: left;">=
=20
<td style=3D"word-wrap: break-word; vertical-align: top; color: #=
3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding:=
0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1=
.5; border-collapse: collapse;">=20
<table class=3D"row" style=3D"border-spacing: 0; border-collapse=
: collapse; vertical-align: top; text-align: left; padding: 0; position: re=
lative; width: 100%; display: table; margin: 0; Margin: 0; font-family: ari=
al,helvetica,sans-serif; min-height: 16px;">=20
<tbody>
<tr style=3D"padding: 0; vertical-align: top; text-align: left=
;">=20
<th class=3D"columns small-12 large-12 first last" style=3D"w=
ord-wrap: break-word; vertical-align: top; color: #3c4144; font-family: ari=
al,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; text-align: left; ma=
rgin: 0 auto; Margin: 0 auto; padding-top: 24px; word-break: break-word; wi=
dth: 564px; padding-left: 24px; padding-right: 24px; font-size: 14px; line-=
height: 2em; border-collapse: collapse; padding-bottom: 10px;">=20
<center style=3D"width: 100%; min-width: 532px;">
If you're having trouble viewing this email, you can <a hre=
f=3D"[link removed]
F8LMAjw8fVT69kS1DOyg0KM-AuE=3D/RfWOZYk5-N7bzCCyjdbe9BX8Mj6n-hsT2QwCm0inPKE=
=3D" target=3D"_blank" title=3D"View email online" style=3D"color: #0074d9;=
text-decoration: none; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weigh=
t: inherit; padding: 0; text-align: left; line-height: 1.5;">see it online<=
/a>.
</center> </th>=20
</tr>=20
</tbody>
</table>=20
<table class=3D"row" style=3D"border-spacing: 0; border-collapse=
: collapse; vertical-align: top; text-align: left; padding: 0; position: re=
lative; width: 100%; display: table; margin: 0; Margin: 0; font-family: ari=
al,helvetica,sans-serif;">=20
<tbody>
<tr style=3D"padding: 0; vertical-align: top; text-align: left=
;">=20
<th class=3D"columns small-12 large-12 first last" style=3D"w=
ord-wrap: break-word; vertical-align: top; color: #3c4144; font-family: ari=
al,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; text-align: left; font-size: 12p=
t; line-height: 1.5; margin: 0 auto; Margin: 0 auto; padding-top: 24px; pad=
ding-bottom: 24px; word-break: break-word; width: 564px; padding-left: 24px=
; padding-right: 24px; border-collapse: collapse; padding: 0;">=20
<center style=3D"width: 100%; min-width: 532px;">=20
</center> </th>=20
</tr>=20
</tbody>
</table>=20
<table class=3D"row first-row-header only3" style=3D"border-spac=
ing: 0; border-collapse: collapse; vertical-align: top; text-align: left; p=
adding: 0; position: relative; width: 100%; display: table; margin: 0; Marg=
in: 0; background-color: #FFFFFF; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"=
>=20
<tbody>
<tr style=3D"padding: 0; vertical-align: top; text-align: left=
;">=20
<th class=3D"columns small-12 large-12 first last default" st=
yle=3D"word-wrap: break-word; vertical-align: top; color: #3c4144; font-fam=
ily: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; text-align: =
left; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin: 0 auto; Margin: 0 auto; wo=
rd-break: break-word; width: 564px; padding-left: 24px; padding-right: 24px=
; border-collapse: collapse; padding-top: 24px; padding-bottom: 12px;"><p s=
tyle=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weigh=
t: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; font-size: 12pt=
; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;"><img style=
=3D"outline: none; text-decoration: none; -ms-interpolation-mode: bicubic; =
max-width: 100%; clear: both; display: block; margin: 0 auto; Margin: 0 aut=
o; float: none; text-align: center; width: 750px; height: auto;" src=3D"htt=
ps://truetexasproject.app.neoncrm.com/neon/resource/truetexasproject/images=
/TTP%20Email%20Header(1).png" alt width=3D"750" height=3D"263"></p></th>=20
</tr>=20
</tbody>
</table>=20
<table class=3D"row content-row-blockpadding" style=3D"border-sp=
acing: 0; border-collapse: collapse; vertical-align: top; text-align: left;=
padding: 0; position: relative; width: 100%; display: table; margin: 0; Ma=
rgin: 0; background-color: #ffffff; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif=
;">=20
<tbody>
<tr style=3D"padding: 0; vertical-align: top; text-align: left=
;">=20
<th class=3D"columns small-12 large-12 first last default" st=
yle=3D"word-wrap: break-word; vertical-align: top; color: #3c4144; font-fam=
ily: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; text-align: =
left; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin: 0 auto; Margin: 0 auto; wo=
rd-break: break-word; width: 564px; padding-left: 24px; padding-right: 24px=
; border-collapse: collapse; padding-top: 12px; padding-bottom: 12px;"><p c=
lass=3D"align-center" style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica=
,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; font-size:=
12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px; text-ali=
gn: center;"><strong>*******OOPS!*********</strong></p> <p style=3D"color: =
#3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding=
: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; font-size: 12pt; line-height: =
1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;">In yesterday's message, I l=
inked an analysis of the amendments from the Texas Legislative Council.&nbs=
p; However, I accidentally linked the previous set of amendments from 2021,=
instead of the current 2023 ballot propositions. Apologies for the error!<=
/p> <p class=3D"align-center" style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,h=
elvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; fo=
nt-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px; =
text-align: center;"><a title=3D"Here is the correct link to the current pr=
oposition analysis" href=3D"[link removed]
k-link/wIZWr7MK1C9lfctjF8LMAjw8fVT69kS1DOyg0KM-AuE=3D/RfWOZYk5-N7bzCCyjdbe9=
PQTRYVU_uE3XOU1nbnEtu8=3D" target=3D"_blank" rel=3D"noopener" style=3D"colo=
r: #0074d9; text-decoration: none; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;=
font-weight: inherit; padding: 0; text-align: left; line-height: 1.5;">Her=
e is the correct link to the current proposition analysis</a></p> <p class=
=3D"align-center" style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,san=
s-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; font-size: 12p=
t; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px; text-align: =
center;">*********************************************</p> <p style=3D"colo=
r: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padd=
ing: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; font-size: 12pt; line-heigh=
t: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;">Dear Citizen Advocates,<=
/p> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; fo=
nt-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; font-si=
ze: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;">Four=
teen Constitutional Amendments will be on our ballots on Nov. 7th in Texas.=
&nbsp; These amendments are often worded strangely, and confusing, and have=
people scratching their heads wondering which way to vote.&nbsp; But no wo=
rries!&nbsp; TTP is here to help.</p> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-fami=
ly: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Ma=
rgin: 0; text-align: left; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom=
: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;">There are several sources you can use to find=
detailed information about these amendments.&nbsp; One is the Secretary of=
State=E2=80=99s <a href=3D"[link removed]
k-link/wIZWr7MK1C9lfctjF8LMAjw8fVT69kS1DOyg0KM-AuE=3D/RfWOZYk5-N7bzCCyjdbe9=
KKZ1IgzhqQ-tSya3CUIct0=3D" style=3D"color: #0074d9; text-decoration: none; =
font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: inherit; padding: 0; =
text-align: left; line-height: 1.5;">Explanation of Constitutional Amendmen=
ts</a> &nbsp;This is the =E2=80=9Cofficial=E2=80=9D explanation from the SO=
S about what the amendments mean, but no recommendations. Another good sour=
ce with voting recommendations is <a href=3D"[link removed]
ils/tracking/click-link/wIZWr7MK1C9lfctjF8LMAjw8fVT69kS1DOyg0KM-AuE=3D/RfWO=
ZYk5-N7bzCCyjdbe9NGWmXYsBOOkpeOurTj4bVk=3D" style=3D"color: #0074d9; text-d=
ecoration: none; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: inhe=
rit; padding: 0; text-align: left; line-height: 1.5;">Texans For Fiscal Res=
ponsibility</a>. &nbsp;<a title=3D"Ballotpedia" href=3D"[link removed]
ils.com/emails/tracking/click-link/wIZWr7MK1C9lfctjF8LMAjw8fVT69kS1DOyg0KM-=
AuE=3D/RfWOZYk5-N7bzCCyjdbe9AsZ1fEvto9u9vW20zjhcTc=3D" target=3D"_blank" re=
l=3D"noopener" style=3D"color: #0074d9; text-decoration: none; font-family:=
arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: inherit; padding: 0; text-align: =
left; line-height: 1.5;">Ballotpedia</a> offers some good background inform=
ation on each amendment, and<a title=3D" The Texas Legislative Council " hr=
ef=3D"[link removed]
jF8LMAjw8fVT69kS1DOyg0KM-AuE=3D/RfWOZYk5-N7bzCCyjdbe9LVRgNg8fs-3chR-o789Ff8=
=3D" target=3D"_blank" rel=3D"noopener" style=3D"color: #0074d9; text-decor=
ation: none; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: inherit;=
padding: 0; text-align: left; line-height: 1.5;"> The Texas Legislative Co=
uncil </a>gives deep dive details on each amendment (the government's offic=
ial analysis).&nbsp; And if you'd like the liberal point of view on these a=
mendments, just consult any Texas legacy media outlets, I'm sure they will =
have comments.</p> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica=
,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align=
: left; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bott=
om: 10px;">Bill Peacock, a consultant with Huffines Liberty Foundation, Tex=
as Scorecard, and formerly with Texas Public Policy Foundation, will be doi=
ng a presentation on the amendments as they relate to budgets and spending =
in several TTP Satellites during September and October . &nbsp;<a title=3D"=
Check the website calendar for locations and dates." href=3D"[link removed]
onemails.com/emails/tracking/click-link/wIZWr7MK1C9lfctjF8LMAjw8fVT69kS1DOy=
g0KM-AuE=3D/RfWOZYk5-N7bzCCyjdbe9NwsDMTLi9x1F_wXVtwhIYo=3D" target=3D"_blan=
k" rel=3D"noopener" style=3D"color: #0074d9; text-decoration: none; font-fa=
mily: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: inherit; padding: 0; text-al=
ign: left; line-height: 1.5;">Check the website calendar for locations and =
dates</a> of Bill's presentations.</p> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-fam=
ily: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; M=
argin: 0; text-align: left; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-botto=
m: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;">I would urge everyone to take a close look a=
t each amendment, study the available information from <span style=3D"text-=
decoration: underline;">trusted</span> resources, and then make an informed=
decision.&nbsp; But for now, here are <em>my personal recommendations </em=
>and <em>personal comments </em>about the amendments.&nbsp; (Apologies in a=
dvance for any snarky remarks that may or may not be contained in this revi=
ew.)</p> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-seri=
f; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; fo=
nt-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;"=
><strong>Some things you should know about first:<br></strong></p> <p style=
=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 4=
00; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; font-size: 12pt; li=
ne-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;">Texas has consti=
tutional limits in place for growing state spending.&nbsp; Budgets can only=
increase year over year by an amount equal to the inflation rate and popul=
ation growth.&nbsp; However, the legislature can override those limits with=
a simple majority vote of both chambers.&nbsp; But it=E2=80=99s not a good=
look to impose spending limits on themselves and then turn around and brea=
k the limits.&nbsp; Voters wouldn=E2=80=99t like that!&nbsp; So instead of =
busting the spending limit, they took 7 items they wanted to spend money on=
, and made them constitutional amendments - <strong>off-budget.</strong>&nb=
sp; This way, they make the voters bust the spending limit so they don=E2=
=80=99t have to.</p> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helveti=
ca,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-ali=
gn: left; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bo=
ttom: 10px;">Of course, no one is telling you that you are busting the spen=
ding limits!&nbsp; You also need to know that even without busting the spen=
ding limits, the budget that was passed for this biennium is 42% higher tha=
n the last one.&nbsp; It=E2=80=99s the biggest spending increase in Texas h=
istory!</p> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-s=
erif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left;=
font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10p=
x;"><strong>Here are the amendments.&nbsp; Choose wisely!</strong></p> <p s=
tyle=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weigh=
t: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; font-size: 12pt=
; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;"><strong><u>P=
roposition 1</u></strong> =E2=80=93 HJR 126 "The constitutional amendment p=
rotecting the right to engage in farming, ranching, timber production, hort=
iculture, and wildlife management."</p> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-fa=
mily: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; =
Margin: 0; text-align: left; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bott=
om: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;"><strong>Cost to Taxpayers</strong>:&nbsp; A=
ccording to the TLO fiscal analysis, this amendment has no fiscal implicati=
ons other than cost of publication.</p> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-fa=
mily: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; =
Margin: 0; text-align: left; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bott=
om: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;">The Author=E2=80=99s statement of intent fo=
r this amendment states:&nbsp; =E2=80=9C<em>Farmers and ranchers who engage=
in production agriculture within municipal boundaries are being subjected =
to broad over regulation by municipal ordinances that prohibit and greatly =
restrict normal practices of agricultural operations, such as the raising a=
nd keeping of livestock, the production of hay, and the cultivation of cert=
ain row crops. H.J.R. 126 seeks to address this issue and empower landowner=
s in the state by constitutionally protecting their right to engage in cert=
ain generally accepted agricultural practices on their own property.=E2=80=
=9D</em></p> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-=
serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left=
; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10=
px;">The amendment does not prevent the legislature or authorized state age=
ncies from regulating these activities for specific purposes in the future.=
</p> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; f=
ont-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; font-s=
ize: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;"><st=
rong>Vote Recommendation:&nbsp; NEUTRAL</strong> =E2=80=93 I see no reason =
to oppose this amendment, it=E2=80=99s harmless, but I also don=E2=80=99t s=
ee why this had to be an amendment.&nbsp; Since when does growing food need=
to be constitutionally protected?&nbsp; If lawmakers were acting responsib=
ly in the interest of all Texans, this would not be a problem.&nbsp; This i=
s one of those amendments that seek to codify your God-given right to life,=
liberty and the pursuit of happiness into the constitution.&nbsp; Just rem=
ember, "rights" granted by the government can also be taken away by the gov=
ernment.</p> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-=
serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left=
; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10=
px;"><strong><u>Proposition 2</u></strong> =E2=80=93 SJR 64 "The constituti=
onal amendment authorizing a local option exemption from ad valorem taxatio=
n by a county or municipality of all or part of the appraised value of real=
property used to operate a child-care facility."</p> <p style=3D"color: #3=
c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: =
0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.=
5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;"><strong>Cost to Taxpayers</st=
rong>:&nbsp; This amendment has no fiscal implications to the state other t=
han the cost of publication. However, it does have fiscal implications for =
cities and counties who adopt the exemption.</p> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144=
; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; ma=
rgin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; ma=
rgin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;">This amendment allows cities and c=
ounties to exempt appraisal values of childcare facilities from property ta=
xes.</p> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-seri=
f; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; fo=
nt-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;"=
><strong>Vote Recommendation =E2=80=93 AGAINST</strong> =E2=80=93 exempting=
certain types of businesses from taxes puts a greater burden on the remain=
ing taxpayers. Exemptions like this have governments picking winners and lo=
sers. Government needs to stay out of the way!</p> <p style=3D"color: #3c41=
44; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; =
margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; =
margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;"><strong><u>Proposition 3</u></st=
rong> =E2=80=93 HJR 132 "The constitutional amendment prohibiting the impos=
ition of an individual wealth or net worth tax, including a tax on the diff=
erence between the assets and liabilities of an individual or family."</p> =
<p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-w=
eight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; font-size: =
12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;"><strong>=
Cost to Taxpayers</strong>:&nbsp; According to the TLO fiscal analysis, thi=
s amendment has no fiscal implications other than cost of publication</p> <=
p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-we=
ight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; font-size: 1=
2pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;">This amen=
dment will prevent the legislature from imposing wealth tax on individuals =
or families (like California has done).&nbsp;</p> <p style=3D"color: #3c414=
4; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; m=
argin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; m=
argin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;"><strong>Vote Recommendation =E2=
=80=93 FOR</strong> =E2=80=93 we would always be opposed to a wealth tax.&n=
bsp; Texans are already taxed at every level of earning and spending, and a=
wealth tax would be a tax on success.&nbsp; But this is another one of tho=
se things that has me asking "why do we need a constitutional amendment for=
this?"</p> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-s=
erif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left;=
font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10p=
x;"><strong><u>Proposition 4</u></strong> =E2=80=93 HJR 2 from the second s=
pecial session "The constitutional amendment to authorize the legislature t=
o establish a temporary limit on the maximum appraised value of real proper=
ty other than a residence homestead for ad valorem tax purposes; to increas=
e the amount of the exemption from ad valorem taxation by a school district=
applicable to residence homesteads from $40,000 to $100,000; to adjust the=
amount of the limitation on school district ad valorem taxes imposed on th=
e residence homesteads of the elderly or disabled to reflect increases in c=
ertain exemption amounts; to except certain appropriations to pay for ad va=
lorem tax relief from the constitutional limitation on the rate of growth o=
f appropriations; and to authorize the legislature to provide for a four-ye=
ar term of office for a member of the board of directors of certain apprais=
al districts."</p> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica=
,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align=
: left; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bott=
om: 10px;"><strong>Cost to Taxpayers </strong>According to the TLO fiscal a=
nalysis, this amendment has no fiscal implications other than cost of publi=
cation.<strong> </strong>However, it does have fiscal implications for scho=
ol boards.</p> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,san=
s-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: le=
ft; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: =
10px;">This is the one from 2^nd special session that is called =
=E2=80=9CThe Biggest Tax Relief Bill in Texas History=E2=80=9D.&nbsp; (it i=
sn=E2=80=99t!).&nbsp; It contains 4 parts:&nbsp; (1) temporary limit on app=
raisal value of non-homesteaded properties;&nbsp; (2) increase homestead ex=
emptions for school&nbsp; taxes to $100,000; (3) exempt certain appropriati=
ons to pay for tax relief from the constitutional growth limitation; and (4=
) authorizes the legislature to provide for a 4-year term of office for a m=
ember of the board of certain appraisal districts.</p> <p style=3D"color: #=
3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding:=
0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1=
.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;"><strong>Vote Recommendation =
=E2=80=93 FOR</strong> =E2=80=93 This =E2=80=9Cgiant=E2=80=9D tax relief bi=
ll will provide very short-lived tax relief, which will quickly be eaten up=
by inflation, appraisal increases, and governments=E2=80=99 reluctance to =
control spending and lower tax rates.&nbsp; But since some tax relief is be=
tter than none, so we recommend voting FOR. &nbsp;</p> <p style=3D"color: #=
3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding:=
0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1=
.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;"><strong><u>Proposition 5</u>=
</strong> =E2=80=93 HJR 3 "The constitutional amendment relating to the Tex=
as University Fund, which provides funding to certain institutions of highe=
r education to achieve national prominence as major research universities a=
nd drive the state economy."</p> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: a=
rial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin:=
0; text-align: left; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10p=
x; Margin-bottom: 10px;"><strong>Cost to Taxpayers</strong>:&nbsp; This ame=
ndment will cost $412 million the first year (taken from the rainy-day fund=
), and then about $120 million per year after that.</p> <p style=3D"color: =
#3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding=
: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; font-size: 12pt; line-height: =
1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;"><strong><em>This propositio=
n is one of several that establish a =E2=80=9Cfund=E2=80=9D for some partic=
ular purpose, and keeps the spending off budget.&nbsp;&nbsp; To keep from b=
reaking the spending limit, they=E2=80=99ve hidden that spending in these C=
onstitutional Amendments, so they can tell voters they didn=E2=80=99t bust =
the spending limit.</em></strong></p> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-fami=
ly: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Ma=
rgin: 0; text-align: left; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom=
: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;"><strong>Vote Recommendation =E2=80=93 AGAINST=
</strong> =E2=80=93 In addition to the sneaky nature of these =E2=80=9Cfund=
=E2=80=9D amendments which is worth opposing, consider that we already fund=
higher education by billions each year, and they have become primarily lef=
tist indoctrination meccas, so it=E2=80=99s a big NO for me.</p> <p style=
=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 4=
00; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; font-size: 12pt; li=
ne-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;"><strong><u>Propo=
sition 6</u></strong> =E2=80=93 SJR 75 "The constitutional amendment creati=
ng the Texas water fund to assist in financing water projects in this state=
."</p> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;=
font-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; font=
-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;"><=
strong>Cost to Taxpayers</strong>:&nbsp; This amendment will cost taxpayers=
$1 Billion.</p> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,s=
ans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: =
left; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom=
: 10px;">This is another one of the =E2=80=9Cfund=E2=80=9D amendments that =
became an amendment so they wouldn=E2=80=99t have to show spending in the b=
udget.</p> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-se=
rif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; =
font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px=
;"><strong>Vote Recommendation =E2=80=93 AGAINST</strong> =E2=80=93 see Pro=
position 5 above.&nbsp; Plus, the state is already spending money on financ=
ing water projects and not solving the problem.&nbsp; This fund is socialis=
tic and is government ownership of means of production.&nbsp; (Can you say =
"More Freedom, Less Government"?)</p> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-fami=
ly: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Ma=
rgin: 0; text-align: left; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom=
: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;"><strong><u>Proposition 7</u></strong> =E2=80=
=93 SJR 93 "The constitutional amendment providing for the creation of the =
Texas energy fund to support the construction, maintenance, modernization, =
and operation of electric generating facilities."</p> <p style=3D"color: #3=
c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: =
0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.=
5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;"><strong>Cost to Taxpayers</st=
rong>:&nbsp; This amendment will cost taxpayers $5 Billion.&nbsp;</p> <p st=
yle=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight=
: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; font-size: 12pt;=
line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;"><strong>Vote =
Recommendation =E2=80=93 AGAINST</strong> =E2=80=93 see Proposition 5 above=
. This fund would incentivize construction, maintenance, modernization, and=
operation of electric generating facilities.&nbsp; It provides loans and g=
rants to electric generating companies.&nbsp; We already subsidize renewabl=
e and traditional electric generation with about $6 Billion per year.</p> <=
p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-we=
ight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; font-size: 1=
2pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;"><strong><=
u>Proposition 8</u></strong> =E2=80=93 HJR 125 "The constitutional amendmen=
t creating the broadband infrastructure fund to expand high-speed broadband=
access and assist in the financing of connectivity projects."</p> <p style=
=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 4=
00; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; font-size: 12pt; li=
ne-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;"><strong>Cost to =
Taxpayers</strong>:&nbsp; This amendment will cost taxpayers $1.5 Billion.<=
/p> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; fo=
nt-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; font-si=
ze: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;"><str=
ong>Vote Recommendation =E2=80=93 AGAINST</strong> =E2=80=93 obvious reason=
s, but see Proposition 5 above. Another =E2=80=9Cfund=E2=80=9D amendment, b=
ut this one is flat out corporate welfare.&nbsp; Why should tax payers subs=
idize phone companies to expand service so the phone companies can turn aro=
und and make more money off the expanded service customers?&nbsp; Besides, =
Elon Musk is building satellites as fast as you can say =E2=80=9Ctwitter is=
now X=E2=80=9D, that will cover the rural areas, so phone company internet=
is soon going to be obsolete.&nbsp; We lobbied against this legislation du=
ring the session as crony capitalism and government interference in markets=
.</p> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; =
font-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; font-=
size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;"><s=
trong><u>Proposition 9</u></strong> =E2=80=93 HJR 2, regular session "The c=
onstitutional amendment authorizing the 88th Legislature to provide a cost-=
of-living adjustment to certain annuitants of the Teacher Retirement System=
of Texas."</p> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sa=
ns-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: l=
eft; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom:=
10px;"><strong>Cost to Taxpayers</strong>:&nbsp; This amendment will cost =
taxpayers $5 Billion</p> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,hel=
vetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text=
-align: left; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margi=
n-bottom: 10px;">Provides a cost-of-living adjustment to the teachers who a=
re receiving retirement benefits.</p> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-fami=
ly: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Ma=
rgin: 0; text-align: left; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom=
: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;"><strong>Vote Recommendation =E2=80=93 NEUTRAL=
</strong> =E2=80=93 Everyone likes teachers!&nbsp; It=E2=80=99s hard to say=
no to helping them cope with inflation since they have not had a raise in =
several years.&nbsp; But it will cost the state billions. So you decide.&nb=
sp; Just know that if you vote against this amendment, it means that you ha=
te teachers.</p> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,s=
ans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: =
left; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom=
: 10px;"><strong><u>Proposition 10</u></strong> =E2=80=93 SJR 87 "The const=
itutional amendment to authorize the legislature to exempt from ad valorem =
taxation equipment or inventory held by a manufacturer of medical or biomed=
ical products to protect the Texas healthcare network and strengthen our me=
dical supply chain."</p> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,hel=
vetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text=
-align: left; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margi=
n-bottom: 10px;"><strong>Cost to Taxpayers</strong>:&nbsp; This amendment w=
ill cost taxpayers $29 million in the first 2 years, then approximately $40=
million annually.</p> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helve=
tica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-a=
lign: left; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-=
bottom: 10px;">Like proposition #2, this amendment grants property tax exem=
ptions to a certain industry =E2=80=93 medical supply equipment.</p> <p sty=
le=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight:=
400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; font-size: 12pt; =
line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;"><strong>Vote R=
ecommendation =E2=80=93 AGAINST</strong> - exempting certain types of busin=
esses from taxes puts a greater burden on the remaining taxpayers.&nbsp; Ex=
emptions like this have governments picking winners and losers.</p> <p styl=
e=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: =
400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; font-size: 12pt; l=
ine-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;"><strong><u>Prop=
osition 11</u></strong> =E2=80=93 SJR 32 "The constitutional amendment auth=
orizing the legislature to permit conservation and reclamation districts in=
El Paso County to issue bonds supported by ad valorem taxes to fund the de=
velopment and maintenance of parks and recreational facilities."</p> <p sty=
le=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight:=
400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; font-size: 12pt; =
line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;"><strong>Cost t=
o Taxpayers</strong>:&nbsp; According to the TLO fiscal analysis, this amen=
dment has no fiscal impact to the state other than the cost of publication.=
&nbsp; It potentially could have a financial impact on the citizens of El P=
aso County in the form of higher property taxes to support bonds.</p> <p st=
yle=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight=
: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; font-size: 12pt;=
line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;">How did this =
end up as a constitutional amendment?&nbsp; It feels like a local issue.&nb=
sp; But in 2003, the constitution was amended, giving conservation &amp; re=
clamation districts in certain counties the ability to issue bonds for park=
s and recreation.&nbsp; El Paso was not included, so this amendment adds El=
Paso County to the counties enumerated in the legislation.</p> <p style=3D=
"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400;=
padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; font-size: 12pt; line-=
height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;"><strong>Vote Recomm=
endation =E2=80=93 AGAINST</strong> =E2=80=93 we generally oppose all bonds=
, and this amendment would provide additional capacity for El Paso County t=
o increase taxes to fund parks and recreation facilities with new bonds.&nb=
sp;&nbsp; Texans are taxed enough already.&nbsp; Even in El Paso County!</p=
> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font=
-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; font-size=
: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;"><stron=
g><u>Proposition 12</u></strong> =E2=80=93 HJR 134 "The constitutional amen=
dment providing for the abolition of the office of county treasurer in Galv=
eston County."</p> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica=
,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align=
: left; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bott=
om: 10px;"><strong>Cost to Taxpayers</strong>:&nbsp; According to the TLO f=
iscal analysis, this amendment has no fiscal impact for the State.&nbsp; Ga=
lveston County anticipates savings if the amendment passes.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbs=
p;&nbsp;</p> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-=
serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left=
; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10=
px;">This amendment would abolish the position of County Treasurer in Galve=
ston County, which was requested by the current County Treasurer of Galvest=
on County in the last campaign.&nbsp; In order for the amendment to pass, i=
t needs not only a majority vote of the whole State, but also a majority vo=
te in Galveston County.</p> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,=
helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; t=
ext-align: left; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Ma=
rgin-bottom: 10px;"><strong>Vote Recommendation =E2=80=93 NEUTRAL</strong> =
=E2=80=93 The current Treasurer campaigned on a promise to eliminate his po=
sition, which prompted this legislative action.&nbsp; Since one less govern=
ment position means less government, it=E2=80=99s probably a good thing.&nb=
sp; So, my position is NEUTRAL, leaning towards FOR.&nbsp; (If I lived in G=
alveston County, this would be a total FOR)</p> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144;=
font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; mar=
gin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; mar=
gin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;"><strong><u>Proposition 13</u></stro=
ng> =E2=80=93 HJR 107 "The constitutional amendment to increase the mandato=
ry age of retirement for state justices and judges."</p> <p style=3D"color:=
#3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; paddin=
g: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; font-size: 12pt; line-height:=
1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;"><strong>Cost to Taxpayers<=
/strong>:&nbsp; Indeterminate, since we cannot know how many judges would e=
lect to serve longer.</p> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,he=
lvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; tex=
t-align: left; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Marg=
in-bottom: 10px;">This amendment raises the current mandatory retirement ag=
e for State Justices and Judges from 75 to 79.</p> <p style=3D"color: #3c41=
44; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; =
margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; =
margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;"><strong>Vote Recommendation =E2=
=80=93 I DON=E2=80=99T KNOW!</strong> =E2=80=93 This is a hard one for me.&=
nbsp; While it=E2=80=99s nice to take advantage of the collective wisdom of=
the older judges, there is the risk of aging issues affecting the judicial=
system.&nbsp;&nbsp; The State could benefit from new, younger candidates, =
so I=E2=80=99ll leave this one as NEUTRAL (because I can=E2=80=99t make up =
my mind!&nbsp; You decide.)</p> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: ar=
ial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: =
0; text-align: left; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px=
; Margin-bottom: 10px;"><strong><u>Proposition 14</u></strong> =E2=80=93 SJ=
R 74 "The constitutional amendment providing for the creation of the centen=
nial parks conservation fund to be used for the creation and improvement of=
state parks."</p> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica=
,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align=
: left; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bott=
om: 10px;"><strong>Cost to Taxpayers</strong>:&nbsp; This amendment will co=
st taxpayers $1 Billion</p> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,=
helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; t=
ext-align: left; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Ma=
rgin-bottom: 10px;">Another =E2=80=9Cfund=E2=80=9D amendment so I=E2=80=99l=
l refer you to =E2=80=9Cfund=E2=80=9D amendment comments above.</p> <p styl=
e=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: =
400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; font-size: 12pt; l=
ine-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;"><strong>Vote Re=
commendation =E2=80=93 NO</strong> =E2=80=93 enough said.</p> <p style=3D"c=
olor: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; p=
adding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; font-size: 12pt; line-he=
ight: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;">&nbsp;</p> <p style=
=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 4=
00; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; font-size: 12pt; li=
ne-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;"><strong>Here's w=
hat Bill Peacock has to say about the 7 "fund" amendments:</strong></p>=20
<div>=20
<div>
<em>None of these amendments would do much, if anything, t=
o solve problems we are facing or improve the&nbsp;Texas economy. They are =
simply corporate welfare,&nbsp;with a little university welfare thrown in,&=
nbsp;designed to deceive voters into thinking they are serious solutions to=
our&nbsp;problems. Also, in almost every case, the Legislature is telling =
us they don=E2=80=99t trust markets=E2=80=93and the people in them=E2=80=93=
to work out solutions to our problems; they will fix the problems for us.&n=
bsp;Additionally, they take all this money out from underneath the constitu=
tional limit on spending growth. It is just&nbsp;a free pass for the Legisl=
ature to spend our money.</em>
</div>=20
<div>
&nbsp;
</div>=20
<div>
<em><span style=3D"color: #20124d;">Not only are these con=
stitutional amendments greatly&nbsp;flawed, but they also will take out of =
circulation close to $12 billion Texas could&nbsp;use to buy down the prope=
rty&nbsp;tax. That would&nbsp;double the amount the Legislature is likely t=
o provide this year.</span></em>
</div>=20
</div>=20
<div>
&nbsp;
</div>=20
<div>
We appreciate this information provided by Bill Peacock, an=
d we encourage True Texans to vote wisely.
</div>=20
<div>
&nbsp;
</div> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvet=
ica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-al=
ign: left; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-b=
ottom: 10px;">That's all for now - stay informed, and stay engaged!</p> <p =
style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weig=
ht: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; font-size: 12p=
t; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px;">For Texas a=
lways,</p> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-se=
rif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; =
font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px=
;">Fran Rhodes, President</p> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: aria=
l,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0;=
text-align: left; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; =
Margin-bottom: 10px;">PS:&nbsp; Something to note - on all of the amendment=
s that have "no fiscal impact beyond cost of publication" the fiscal analys=
is has the cost of publication at $204,406 per amendment.&nbsp; Does that m=
ean that all of these amendments pass, the total cost of publication would =
be $2,861,684?&nbsp; I don't do math =F0=9F=98=8A but if that's right, it m=
ight be reason enough to vote AGAINST!</p></th>=20
</tr>=20
</tbody>
</table>=20
<table class=3D"row end-row-footer" style=3D"border-spacing: 0; =
border-collapse: collapse; vertical-align: top; text-align: left; padding: =
0; position: relative; width: 100%; display: table; margin: 0; Margin: 0; b=
ackground-color: #ffffff; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;">=20
<tbody>
<tr style=3D"padding: 0; vertical-align: top; text-align: left=
;">=20
<th class=3D"columns small-12 large-12 first last default" st=
yle=3D"word-wrap: break-word; vertical-align: top; color: #3c4144; font-fam=
ily: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; text-align: =
left; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin: 0 auto; Margin: 0 auto; wo=
rd-break: break-word; width: 564px; padding-left: 24px; padding-right: 24px=
; border-collapse: collapse; padding-top: 12px; padding-bottom: 24px;"><p s=
tyle=3D"color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weigh=
t: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5=
; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-bottom: 10px; text-align: center;"><span styl=
e=3D"font-size: 14px;">&nbsp;</span></p> <p style=3D"color: #3c4144; font-f=
amily: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; margin: 0;=
Margin: 0; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 1.5; margin-bottom: 10px; Margin-=
bottom: 10px; text-align: center;"><strong><span style=3D"color: #cc0000;">=
True Texas Project works hard to train and engage activists.<br>Can you hel=
p?<br>We are 100% donation-based.</span><br><span style=3D"color: #000055;"=
>Click </span><a href=3D"[link removed]
ink/wIZWr7MK1C9lfctjF8LMAjw8fVT69kS1DOyg0KM-AuE=3D/RfWOZYk5-N7bzCCyjdbe9LCN=
Ml0A5tQJOVKLqfRi0y0=3D" style=3D"color: #0074d9; text-decoration: none; fon=
t-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: inherit; padding: 0; tex=
t-align: left; line-height: 1.5;"><span style=3D"color: #cc0000;">here</spa=
n></a><span style=3D"color: #000055;"> to donate to our cause.&nbsp; &nbsp;=
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span></strong></p>=20
<table style=3D"border-spacing: 0; border-collapse: collapse=
; padding: 0; vertical-align: top; text-align: left; max-width: 100%; width=
: 100%;" data-v-45dfea3e>=20
<tbody>=20
<tr data-v-45dfea3e style=3D"padding: 0; vertical-align: t=
op; text-align: left;">=20
<th style=3D"word-wrap: break-word; vertical-align: top; =
color: #3c4144; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; =
padding: 0; margin: 0; Margin: 0; text-align: left; font-size: 12pt; line-h=
eight: 1.5; width: 100%; border-collapse: collapse;" data-v-45dfea3e>
<center style=3D"width: 100%; min-width: 532px; text-ali=
gn: center;" data-v-45dfea3e>
<a title=3D"Facebook" href=3D"[link removed]
m/emails/tracking/click-link/wIZWr7MK1C9lfctjF8LMAjw8fVT69kS1DOyg0KM-AuE=3D=
/RfWOZYk5-N7bzCCyjdbe9NLN9hJPHnEClEjzQzHx0LE=3D" target=3D"_blank" rel=3D"n=
oopener" style=3D"color: #0074d9; text-decoration: none; font-family: arial=
,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: inherit; padding: 0; text-align: left; =
line-height: 1.5;"><img src=3D"[link removed]
rkicons/Facebook.png" alt=3D"Facebook" width=3D"30" border=3D"0" style=3D"o=
utline: none; text-decoration: none; -ms-interpolation-mode: bicubic; max-w=
idth: 100%; clear: both; margin: 0 auto; Margin: 0 auto; float: none; text-=
align: center; border: none; display: block; height: auto;"></a>&nbsp;&nbsp=
;<a title=3D"Instagram" href=3D"[link removed]
click-link/wIZWr7MK1C9lfctjF8LMAjw8fVT69kS1DOyg0KM-AuE=3D/RfWOZYk5-N7bzCCyj=
dbe9Hwr9QYtOX4N1c7AGIXRZZ0=3D" target=3D"_blank" rel=3D"noopener" style=3D"=
color: #0074d9; text-decoration: none; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-se=
rif; font-weight: inherit; padding: 0; text-align: left; line-height: 1.5;"=
><img src=3D"[link removed]
png" alt=3D"Instagram" width=3D"30" border=3D"0" style=3D"outline: none; te=
xt-decoration: none; -ms-interpolation-mode: bicubic; max-width: 100%; clea=
r: both; margin: 0 auto; Margin: 0 auto; float: none; text-align: center; b=
order: none; display: block; height: auto;"></a>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a title=3D"Twi=
tter" href=3D"[link removed]
K1C9lfctjF8LMAjw8fVT69kS1DOyg0KM-AuE=3D/RfWOZYk5-N7bzCCyjdbe9O04VyX06WaIkg1=
G1LEHkAY=3D" target=3D"_blank" rel=3D"noopener" style=3D"color: #0074d9; te=
xt-decoration: none; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: =
inherit; padding: 0; text-align: left; line-height: 1.5;"><img src=3D"https=
://neonstatic.s3.amazonaws.com/email/darkicons/Twitter.png" alt=3D"Twitter"=
width=3D"30" border=3D"0" style=3D"outline: none; text-decoration: none; -=
ms-interpolation-mode: bicubic; max-width: 100%; clear: both; margin: 0 aut=
o; Margin: 0 auto; float: none; text-align: center; border: none; display: =
block; height: auto;"></a>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a title=3D"YouTube" href=3D"[link removed]
api.neonemails.com/emails/tracking/click-link/wIZWr7MK1C9lfctjF8LMAjw8fVT69=
kS1DOyg0KM-AuE=3D/RfWOZYk5-N7bzCCyjdbe9F3Bou6QaRLe3gGz564HVeI=3D" target=3D=
"_blank" rel=3D"noopener" style=3D"color: #0074d9; text-decoration: none; f=
ont-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: inherit; padding: 0; t=
ext-align: left; line-height: 1.5;"><img src=3D"[link removed]
naws.com/email/darkicons/YouTube.png" alt=3D"YouTube" width=3D"30" border=
=3D"0" style=3D"outline: none; text-decoration: none; -ms-interpolation-mod=
e: bicubic; max-width: 100%; clear: both; margin: 0 auto; Margin: 0 auto; f=
loat: none; text-align: center; border: none; display: block; height: auto;=
"></a>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a title=3D"Website" href=3D"[link removed]
mails/tracking/click-link/wIZWr7MK1C9lfctjF8LMAjw8fVT69kS1DOyg0KM-AuE=3D/Rf=
WOZYk5-N7bzCCyjdbe9POk4XH1MrkkkauAxodUiMA=3D" target=3D"_blank" rel=3D"noop=
ener" style=3D"color: #0074d9; text-decoration: none; font-family: arial,he=
lvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: inherit; padding: 0; text-align: left; lin=
e-height: 1.5;"><img src=3D"[link removed]
cons/Website.png" alt=3D"Website" width=3D"30" border=3D"0" style=3D"outlin=
e: none; text-decoration: none; -ms-interpolation-mode: bicubic; max-width:=
100%; clear: both; margin: 0 auto; Margin: 0 auto; float: none; text-align=
: center; border: none; display: block; height: auto;"></a>&nbsp;
</center>
<center style=3D"width: 100%; min-width: 532px; text-ali=
gn: center;" data-v-45dfea3e>
&nbsp;
</center>
<center style=3D"width: 100%; min-width: 532px; text-ali=
gn: center;" data-v-45dfea3e>
<span style=3D"color: #000066;">Tired of getting so man=
y emails?&nbsp; Please be patient!</span>
</center>
<center style=3D"width: 100%; min-width: 532px; text-ali=
gn: center;" data-v-45dfea3e>
<br><span style=3D"color: #000080;"><span style=3D"font=
-size: 11px;">We put the location in the subject of every <u>event</u> emai=
l so that you can easily delete without opening it, but you know what is a =
better idea?&nbsp; Forward the event to those you know in that area!&nbsp; =
We send all event emails to all subscribers because so many True Texans do =
just that... share the invites!&nbsp; We hope you will too, but if not, kin=
dly just delete.&nbsp; No need to send in a complaint or unsubscribe.&nbsp;=
There truly is a method to our madness as we work hard to build the army a=
cross this great big state!&nbsp; Sometimes we send emails only to specific=
counties.&nbsp; If you want to update what counties are on your profile, p=
lease <a href=3D"[link removed]
r7MK1C9lfctjF8LMAjw8fVT69kS1DOyg0KM-AuE=3D/RfWOZYk5-N7bzCCyjdbe9FopyW4z6DT8=
J5TzvJMfsEE=3D" style=3D"color: #0074d9; text-decoration: none; font-family=
: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: inherit; padding: 0; text-align:=
left; line-height: 1.5;">click here</a>.<br>BONUS TIP: remove the "unsubsc=
ribe" line at the bottom of your email before you forward it! Otherwise the=
recipient may unsubscribe YOU!</span></span>
</center></th>=20
</tr>=20
</tbody>=20
</table></th>=20
</tr>=20
</tbody>
</table>=20
<table class=3D"row" style=3D"border-spacing: 0; border-collapse=
: collapse; vertical-align: top; text-align: left; padding: 0; position: re=
lative; width: 100%; display: table; margin: 0; Margin: 0; font-family: ari=
al,helvetica,sans-serif;">=20
<tbody>
<tr style=3D"padding: 0; vertical-align: top; text-align: left=
;">=20
<th class=3D"columns small-12 large-12 first last" style=3D"w=
ord-wrap: break-word; vertical-align: top; color: #3c4144; font-family: ari=
al,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; text-align: left; font-size: 12p=
t; line-height: 1.5; margin: 0 auto; Margin: 0 auto; padding-top: 24px; pad=
ding-bottom: 24px; word-break: break-word; width: 564px; padding-left: 24px=
; padding-right: 24px; border-collapse: collapse; padding: 0;">=20
<center style=3D"width: 100%; min-width: 532px;">=20
</center> </th>=20
</tr>=20
</tbody>
</table>=20
<table class=3D"row" style=3D"border-spacing: 0; border-collapse=
: collapse; vertical-align: top; text-align: left; padding: 0; position: re=
lative; width: 100%; display: table; margin: 0; Margin: 0; font-family: ari=
al,helvetica,sans-serif;">=20
<tbody>
<tr style=3D"padding: 0; vertical-align: top; text-align: left=
;">=20
<th class=3D"columns small-12 large-12 first last" style=3D"w=
ord-wrap: break-word; vertical-align: top; color: #3c4144; font-family: ari=
al,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: 400; padding: 0; text-align: left; ma=
rgin: 0 auto; Margin: 0 auto; padding-bottom: 24px; word-break: break-word;=
width: 564px; padding-left: 24px; padding-right: 24px; font-size: 14px; li=
ne-height: 2em; border-collapse: collapse; padding-top: 10px;">=20
<center style=3D"width: 100%; min-width: 532px;">
This email was sent to [email protected]. <a href=3D=
"[link removed]
Ajw8fVT69kS1DOyg0KM-AuE=3D/RfWOZYk5-N7bzCCyjdbe9NXDTlOHpLl9tu0PqOJo6q0=3D" =
target=3D"_blank" title=3D"Unsubscribe from email list" style=3D"color: #00=
74d9; text-decoration: none; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-=
weight: inherit; padding: 0; text-align: left; line-height: 1.5;">Click her=
e to unsubscribe.</a>
</center> </th>=20
</tr>=20
</tbody>
</table> </td>=20
</tr>=20
</tbody>
</table>=20
</center> </td>=20
</tr>=20
</tbody>
</table> =20
<img src=3D"[link removed]
yLink?orgId=3Dtruetexasproject&amp;emailId&#61;fbea7eb7441e511e9ebb528c2c10=
5caafm3130885fbe&amp;targetUrl=3Dhttps://truetexasproject.app.neoncrm.com/n=
p/images/s.gif" width=3D"1" height=3D"1" border=3D"0">
</body>
</html><img width=3D'1' height=3D'1' border=3D'0' src=3D'[link removed]
ails.com/emails/tracking/open-link/wIZWr7MK1C9lfctjF8LMAjw8fVT69kS1DOyg0KM-=
AuE=3D'/>
------=_Part_86593907_1040117585.1692975334627--

------=_Part_86593903_1461516146.1692975334613--

If you're having trouble viewing this email, you can see it online, [link removed].
*******OOPS!*********

In yesterday's message, I linked an analysis of the amendments from the Texas Legislative Council. However, I accidentally linked the previous set of amendments instead of the current 2023 ballot propositions. Apologies for the error!

Here is the correct link to the current proposition analysis

*********************************************

Dear Citizen Advocates,

Fourteen Constitutional Amendments will be on our ballots on Nov. 7th in Texas. These amendments are often worded strangely, and confusing, and have people scratching their heads wondering which way to vote. But no worries! TTP is here to help.

There are several sources you can use to find detailed information about these amendments. One is the Secretary of State’s Explanation of Constitutional Amendments This is the “official” explanation from the SOS about what the amendments mean, but no recommendations. Another good source with voting recommendations is Texans For Fiscal Responsibility. Ballotpedia offers some good background information on each amendment, and The Texas Legislative Council gives deep dive details on each amendment (the government's official analysis). And if you'd like the liberal point of view on these amendments, just consult any Texas legacy media outlets, I'm sure they will have comments.

Bill Peacock, a consultant with Huffines Liberty Foundation, Texas Scorecard, and formerly with Texas Public Policy Foundation, will be doing a presentation on the amendments as they relate to budgets and spending in several TTP Satellites during September and October . Check the website calendar for locations and dates of Bill's presentations.

I would urge everyone to take a close look at each amendment, study the available information from trusted resources, and then make an informed decision. But for now, here are my personal recommendations and personal comments about the amendments. (Apologies in advance for any snarky remarks that may or may not be contained in this review.)

Some things you should know about first:


Texas has constitutional limits in place for growing state spending. Budgets can only increase year over year by an amount equal to the inflation rate and population growth. However, the legislature can override those limits with a simple majority vote of both chambers. But it’s not a good look to impose spending limits on themselves and then turn around and break the limits. Voters wouldn’t like that! So instead of busting the spending limit, they took 7 items they wanted to spend money on, and made them constitutional amendments - off-budget. This way, they make the voters bust the spending limit so they don’t have to.

Of course, no one is telling you that you are busting the spending limits! You also need to know that even without busting the spending limits, the budget that was passed for this biennium is 42% higher than the last one. It’s the biggest spending increase in Texas history!

Here are the amendments. Choose wisely!

Proposition 1 – HJR 126 "The constitutional amendment protecting the right to engage in farming, ranching, timber production, horticulture, and wildlife management."

Cost to Taxpayers: According to the TLO fiscal analysis, this amendment has no fiscal implications other than cost of publication.

The Author’s statement of intent for this amendment states: “Farmers and ranchers who engage in production agriculture within municipal boundaries are being subjected to broad over regulation by municipal ordinances that prohibit and greatly restrict normal practices of agricultural operations, such as the raising and keeping of livestock, the production of hay, and the cultivation of certain row crops. H.J.R. 126 seeks to address this issue and empower landowners in the state by constitutionally protecting their right to engage in certain generally accepted agricultural practices on their own property.”

The amendment does not prevent the legislature or authorized state agencies from regulating these activities for specific purposes in the future.

Vote Recommendation: NEUTRAL – I see no reason to oppose this amendment, it’s harmless, but I also don’t see why this had to be an amendment. Since when does growing food need to be constitutionally protected? If lawmakers were acting responsibly in the interest of all Texans, this would not be a problem. This is one of those amendments that seek to codify your God-given right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness into the constitution. Just remember, "rights" granted by the government can also be taken away by the government.

Proposition 2 – SJR 64 "The constitutional amendment authorizing a local option exemption from ad valorem taxation by a county or municipality of all or part of the appraised value of real property used to operate a child-care facility."

Cost to Taxpayers: This amendment has no fiscal implications to the state other than the cost of publication. However, it does have fiscal implications for cities and counties who adopt the exemption.

This amendment allows cities and counties to exempt appraisal values of childcare facilities from property taxes.

Vote Recommendation – AGAINST – exempting certain types of businesses from taxes puts a greater burden on the remaining taxpayers. Exemptions like this have governments picking winners and losers. Government needs to stay out of the way!

Proposition 3 – HJR 132 "The constitutional amendment prohibiting the imposition of an individual wealth or net worth tax, including a tax on the difference between the assets and liabilities of an individual or family."

Cost to Taxpayers: According to the TLO fiscal analysis, this amendment has no fiscal implications other than cost of publication

This amendment will prevent the legislature from imposing wealth tax on individuals or families (like California has done).

Vote Recommendation – FOR – we would always be opposed to a wealth tax. Texans are already taxed at every level of earning and spending, and a wealth tax would be a tax on success. But this is another one of those things that has me asking "why do we need a constitutional amendment for this?"

Proposition 4 – HJR 2 from the second special session "The constitutional amendment to authorize the legislature to establish a temporary limit on the maximum appraised value of real property other than a residence homestead for ad valorem tax purposes; to increase the amount of the exemption from ad valorem taxation by a school district applicable to residence homesteads from $40,000 to $100,000; to adjust the amount of the limitation on school district ad valorem taxes imposed on the residence homesteads of the elderly or disabled to reflect increases in certain exemption amounts; to except certain appropriations to pay for ad valorem tax relief from the constitutional limitation on the rate of growth of appropriations; and to authorize the legislature to provide for a four-year term of office for a member of the board of directors of certain appraisal districts."

Cost to Taxpayers According to the TLO fiscal analysis, this amendment has no fiscal implications other than cost of publication. However, it does have fiscal implications for school boards.

This is the one from 2nd special session that is called “The Biggest Tax Relief Bill in Texas History”. (it isn’t!). It contains 4 parts: (1) temporary limit on appraisal value of non-homesteaded properties; (2) increase homestead exemptions for school taxes to $100,000; (3) exempt certain appropriations to pay for tax relief from the constitutional growth limitation; and (4) authorizes the legislature to provide for a 4-year term of office for a member of the board of certain appraisal districts.

Vote Recommendation – FOR – This “giant” tax relief bill will provide very short-lived tax relief, which will quickly be eaten up by inflation, appraisal increases, and governments’ reluctance to control spending and lower tax rates. But since some tax relief is better than none, so we recommend voting FOR.

Proposition 5 – HJR 3 "The constitutional amendment relating to the Texas University Fund, which provides funding to certain institutions of higher education to achieve national prominence as major research universities and drive the state economy."

Cost to Taxpayers: This amendment will cost $412 million the first year (taken from the rainy-day fund), and then about $120 million per year after that.

This proposition is one of several that establish a “fund” for some particular purpose, and keeps the spending off budget. To keep from breaking the spending limit, they’ve hidden that spending in these Constitutional Amendments, so they can tell voters they didn’t bust the spending limit.

Vote Recommendation – AGAINST – In addition to the sneaky nature of these “fund” amendments which is worth opposing, consider that we already fund higher education by billions each year, and they have become primarily leftist indoctrination meccas, so it’s a big NO for me.

Proposition 6 – SJR 75 "The constitutional amendment creating the Texas water fund to assist in financing water projects in this state."

Cost to Taxpayers: This amendment will cost taxpayers $1 Billion.

This is another one of the “fund” amendments that became an amendment so they wouldn’t have to show spending in the budget.

Vote Recommendation – AGAINST – see Proposition 5 above. Plus, the state is already spending money on financing water projects and not solving the problem. This fund is socialistic and is government ownership of means of production. (Can you say "More Freedom, Less Government"?)

Proposition 7 – SJR 93 "The constitutional amendment providing for the creation of the Texas energy fund to support the construction, maintenance, modernization, and operation of electric generating facilities."

Cost to Taxpayers: This amendment will cost taxpayers $5 Billion.

Vote Recommendation – AGAINST – see Proposition 5 above. This fund would incentivize construction, maintenance, modernization, and operation of electric generating facilities. It provides loans and grants to electric generating companies. We already subsidize renewable and traditional electric generation with about $6 Billion per year.

Proposition 8 – HJR 125 "The constitutional amendment creating the broadband infrastructure fund to expand high-speed broadband access and assist in the financing of connectivity projects."

Cost to Taxpayers: This amendment will cost taxpayers $1.5 Billion.

Vote Recommendation – AGAINST – obvious reasons, but see Proposition 5 above. Another “fund” amendment, but this one is flat out corporate welfare. Why should tax payers subsidize phone companies to expand service so the phone companies can turn around and make more money off the expanded service customers? Besides, Elon Musk is building satellites as fast as you can say “twitter is now X”, that will cover the rural areas, so phone company internet is soon going to be obsolete. We lobbied against this legislation during the session as crony capitalism and government interference in markets.

Proposition 9 – HJR 2, regular session "The constitutional amendment authorizing the 88th Legislature to provide a cost-of-living adjustment to certain annuitants of the Teacher Retirement System of Texas."

Cost to Taxpayers: This amendment will cost taxpayers $5 Billion

Provides a cost-of-living adjustment to the teachers who are receiving retirement benefits.

Vote Recommendation – NEUTRAL – Everyone likes teachers! It’s hard to say no to helping them cope with inflation since they have not had a raise in several years. But it will cost the state billions. So you decide. Just know that if you vote against this amendment, it means that you hate teachers.

Proposition 10 – SJR 87 "The constitutional amendment to authorize the legislature to exempt from ad valorem taxation equipment or inventory held by a manufacturer of medical or biomedical products to protect the Texas healthcare network and strengthen our medical supply chain."

Cost to Taxpayers: This amendment will cost taxpayers $29 million in the first 2 years, then approximately $40 million annually.

Like proposition #2, this amendment grants property tax exemptions to a certain industry – medical supply equipment.

Vote Recommendation – AGAINST - exempting certain types of businesses from taxes puts a greater burden on the remaining taxpayers. Exemptions like this have governments picking winners and losers.

Proposition 11 – SJR 32 "The constitutional amendment authorizing the legislature to permit conservation and reclamation districts in El Paso County to issue bonds supported by ad valorem taxes to fund the development and maintenance of parks and recreational facilities."

Cost to Taxpayers: According to the TLO fiscal analysis, this amendment has no fiscal impact to the state other than the cost of publication. It potentially could have a financial impact on the citizens of El Paso County in the form of higher property taxes to support bonds.

How did this end up as a constitutional amendment? It feels like a local issue. But in 2003, the constitution was amended, giving conservation & reclamation districts in certain counties the ability to issue bonds for parks and recreation. El Paso was not included, so this amendment adds El Paso County to the counties enumerated in the legislation.

Vote Recommendation – AGAINST – we generally oppose all bonds, and this amendment would provide additional capacity for El Paso County to increase taxes to fund parks and recreation facilities with new bonds. Texans are taxed enough already. Even in El Paso County!

Proposition 12 – HJR 134 "The constitutional amendment providing for the abolition of the office of county treasurer in Galveston County."

Cost to Taxpayers: According to the TLO fiscal analysis, this amendment has no fiscal impact for the State. Galveston County anticipates savings if the amendment passes.

This amendment would abolish the position of County Treasurer in Galveston County, which was requested by the current County Treasurer of Galveston County in the last campaign. In order for the amendment to pass, it needs not only a majority vote of the whole State, but also a majority vote in Galveston County.

Vote Recommendation – NEUTRAL – The current Treasurer campaigned on a promise to eliminate his position, which prompted this legislative action. Since one less government position means less government, it’s probably a good thing. So, my position is NEUTRAL, leaning towards FOR. (If I lived in Galveston County, this would be a total FOR)

Proposition 13 – HJR 107 "The constitutional amendment to increase the mandatory age of retirement for state justices and judges."

Cost to Taxpayers: Indeterminate, since we cannot know how many judges would elect to serve longer.

This amendment raises the current mandatory retirement age for State Justices and Judges from 75 to 79.

Vote Recommendation – I DON’T KNOW! – This is a hard one for me. While it’s nice to take advantage of the collective wisdom of the older judges, there is the risk of aging issues affecting the judicial system. The State could benefit from new, younger candidates, so I’ll leave this one as NEUTRAL (because I can’t make up my mind! You decide.)

Proposition 14 – SJR 74 "The constitutional amendment providing for the creation of the centennial parks conservation fund to be used for the creation and improvement of state parks."

Cost to Taxpayers: This amendment will cost taxpayers $1 Billion

Another “fund” amendment so I’ll refer you to “fund” amendment comments above.

Vote Recommendation – NO – enough said.



Here's what Bill Peacock has to say about the 7 "fund" amendments:

None of these amendments would do much, if anything, to solve problems we are facing or improve the Texas economy. They are simply corporate welfare, with a little university welfare thrown in, designed to deceive voters into thinking they are serious solutions to our problems. Also, in almost every case, the Legislature is telling us they don’t trust markets–and the people in them–to work out solutions to our problems; they will fix the problems for us. Additionally, they take all this money out from underneath the constitutional limit on spending growth. It is just a free pass for the Legislature to spend our money.



Not only are these constitutional amendments greatly flawed, but they also will take out of circulation close to $12 billion Texas could use to buy down the property tax. That would double the amount the Legislature is likely to provide this year.



We appreciate this information provided by Bill Peacock, and we encourage True Texans to vote wisely.



That's all for now - stay informed, and stay engaged!

For Texas always,

Fran Rhodes, President

PS: Something to note - on all of the amendments that have "no fiscal impact beyond cost of publication" the fiscal analysis has the cost of publication at $204,406 per amendment. Does that mean that all of these amendments pass, the total cost of publication would be $2,861,684? I don't do math 😊 but if that's right, it might be reason enough to vote AGAINST!

*******OOPS!*********

In yesterday's message, I linked an analysis of the amendments from the Texas Legislative Council. However, I accidentally linked the previous set of amendments from 2021, instead of the current 2023 ballot propositions. Apologies for the error!

Here is the correct link to the current proposition analysis

*********************************************

Dear Citizen Advocates,

Fourteen Constitutional Amendments will be on our ballots on Nov. 7th in Texas. These amendments are often worded strangely, and confusing, and have people scratching their heads wondering which way to vote. But no worries! TTP is here to help.

There are several sources you can use to find detailed information about these amendments. One is the Secretary of State’s Explanation of Constitutional Amendments This is the “official” explanation from the SOS about what the amendments mean, but no recommendations. Another good source with voting recommendations is Texans For Fiscal Responsibility. Ballotpedia offers some good background information on each amendment, and The Texas Legislative Council gives deep dive details on each amendment (the government's official analysis). And if you'd like the liberal point of view on these amendments, just consult any Texas legacy media outlets, I'm sure they will have comments.

Bill Peacock, a consultant with Huffines Liberty Foundation, Texas Scorecard, and formerly with Texas Public Policy Foundation, will be doing a presentation on the amendments as they relate to budgets and spending in several TTP Satellites during September and October . Check the website calendar for locations and dates of Bill's presentations.

I would urge everyone to take a close look at each amendment, study the available information from trusted resources, and then make an informed decision. But for now, here are my personal recommendations and personal comments about the amendments. (Apologies in advance for any snarky remarks that may or may not be contained in this review.)

Some things you should know about first:


Texas has constitutional limits in place for growing state spending. Budgets can only increase year over year by an amount equal to the inflation rate and population growth. However, the legislature can override those limits with a simple majority vote of both chambers. But it’s not a good look to impose spending limits on themselves and then turn around and break the limits. Voters wouldn’t like that! So instead of busting the spending limit, they took 7 items they wanted to spend money on, and made them constitutional amendments - off-budget. This way, they make the voters bust the spending limit so they don’t have to.

Of course, no one is telling you that you are busting the spending limits! You also need to know that even without busting the spending limits, the budget that was passed for this biennium is 42% higher than the last one. It’s the biggest spending increase in Texas history!

Here are the amendments. Choose wisely!

Proposition 1 – HJR 126 "The constitutional amendment protecting the right to engage in farming, ranching, timber production, horticulture, and wildlife management."

Cost to Taxpayers: According to the TLO fiscal analysis, this amendment has no fiscal implications other than cost of publication.

The Author’s statement of intent for this amendment states: “Farmers and ranchers who engage in production agriculture within municipal boundaries are being subjected to broad over regulation by municipal ordinances that prohibit and greatly restrict normal practices of agricultural operations, such as the raising and keeping of livestock, the production of hay, and the cultivation of certain row crops. H.J.R. 126 seeks to address this issue and empower landowners in the state by constitutionally protecting their right to engage in certain generally accepted agricultural practices on their own property.”

The amendment does not prevent the legislature or authorized state agencies from regulating these activities for specific purposes in the future.

Vote Recommendation: NEUTRAL – I see no reason to oppose this amendment, it’s harmless, but I also don’t see why this had to be an amendment. Since when does growing food need to be constitutionally protected? If lawmakers were acting responsibly in the interest of all Texans, this would not be a problem. This is one of those amendments that seek to codify your God-given right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness into the constitution. Just remember, "rights" granted by the government can also be taken away by the government.

Proposition 2 – SJR 64 "The constitutional amendment authorizing a local option exemption from ad valorem taxation by a county or municipality of all or part of the appraised value of real property used to operate a child-care facility."

Cost to Taxpayers: This amendment has no fiscal implications to the state other than the cost of publication. However, it does have fiscal implications for cities and counties who adopt the exemption.

This amendment allows cities and counties to exempt appraisal values of childcare facilities from property taxes.

Vote Recommendation – AGAINST – exempting certain types of businesses from taxes puts a greater burden on the remaining taxpayers. Exemptions like this have governments picking winners and losers. Government needs to stay out of the way!

Proposition 3 – HJR 132 "The constitutional amendment prohibiting the imposition of an individual wealth or net worth tax, including a tax on the difference between the assets and liabilities of an individual or family."

Cost to Taxpayers: According to the TLO fiscal analysis, this amendment has no fiscal implications other than cost of publication

This amendment will prevent the legislature from imposing wealth tax on individuals or families (like California has done).

Vote Recommendation – FOR – we would always be opposed to a wealth tax. Texans are already taxed at every level of earning and spending, and a wealth tax would be a tax on success. But this is another one of those things that has me asking "why do we need a constitutional amendment for this?"

Proposition 4 – HJR 2 from the second special session "The constitutional amendment to authorize the legislature to establish a temporary limit on the maximum appraised value of real property other than a residence homestead for ad valorem tax purposes; to increase the amount of the exemption from ad valorem taxation by a school district applicable to residence homesteads from $40,000 to $100,000; to adjust the amount of the limitation on school district ad valorem taxes imposed on the residence homesteads of the elderly or disabled to reflect increases in certain exemption amounts; to except certain appropriations to pay for ad valorem tax relief from the constitutional limitation on the rate of growth of appropriations; and to authorize the legislature to provide for a four-year term of office for a member of the board of directors of certain appraisal districts."

Cost to Taxpayers According to the TLO fiscal analysis, this amendment has no fiscal implications other than cost of publication. However, it does have fiscal implications for school boards.

This is the one from 2nd special session that is called “The Biggest Tax Relief Bill in Texas History”. (it isn’t!). It contains 4 parts: (1) temporary limit on appraisal value of non-homesteaded properties; (2) increase homestead exemptions for school taxes to $100,000; (3) exempt certain appropriations to pay for tax relief from the constitutional growth limitation; and (4) authorizes the legislature to provide for a 4-year term of office for a member of the board of certain appraisal districts.

Vote Recommendation – FOR – This “giant” tax relief bill will provide very short-lived tax relief, which will quickly be eaten up by inflation, appraisal increases, and governments’ reluctance to control spending and lower tax rates. But since some tax relief is better than none, so we recommend voting FOR.

Proposition 5 – HJR 3 "The constitutional amendment relating to the Texas University Fund, which provides funding to certain institutions of higher education to achieve national prominence as major research universities and drive the state economy."

Cost to Taxpayers: This amendment will cost $412 million the first year (taken from the rainy-day fund), and then about $120 million per year after that.

This proposition is one of several that establish a “fund” for some particular purpose, and keeps the spending off budget. To keep from breaking the spending limit, they’ve hidden that spending in these Constitutional Amendments, so they can tell voters they didn’t bust the spending limit.

Vote Recommendation – AGAINST – In addition to the sneaky nature of these “fund” amendments which is worth opposing, consider that we already fund higher education by billions each year, and they have become primarily leftist indoctrination meccas, so it’s a big NO for me.

Proposition 6 – SJR 75 "The constitutional amendment creating the Texas water fund to assist in financing water projects in this state."

Cost to Taxpayers: This amendment will cost taxpayers $1 Billion.

This is another one of the “fund” amendments that became an amendment so they wouldn’t have to show spending in the budget.

Vote Recommendation – AGAINST – see Proposition 5 above. Plus, the state is already spending money on financing water projects and not solving the problem. This fund is socialistic and is government ownership of means of production. (Can you say "More Freedom, Less Government"?)

Proposition 7 – SJR 93 "The constitutional amendment providing for the creation of the Texas energy fund to support the construction, maintenance, modernization, and operation of electric generating facilities."

Cost to Taxpayers: This amendment will cost taxpayers $5 Billion.

Vote Recommendation – AGAINST – see Proposition 5 above. This fund would incentivize construction, maintenance, modernization, and operation of electric generating facilities. It provides loans and grants to electric generating companies. We already subsidize renewable and traditional electric generation with about $6 Billion per year.

Proposition 8 – HJR 125 "The constitutional amendment creating the broadband infrastructure fund to expand high-speed broadband access and assist in the financing of connectivity projects."

Cost to Taxpayers: This amendment will cost taxpayers $1.5 Billion.

Vote Recommendation – AGAINST – obvious reasons, but see Proposition 5 above. Another “fund” amendment, but this one is flat out corporate welfare. Why should tax payers subsidize phone companies to expand service so the phone companies can turn around and make more money off the expanded service customers? Besides, Elon Musk is building satellites as fast as you can say “twitter is now X”, that will cover the rural areas, so phone company internet is soon going to be obsolete. We lobbied against this legislation during the session as crony capitalism and government interference in markets.

Proposition 9 – HJR 2, regular session "The constitutional amendment authorizing the 88th Legislature to provide a cost-of-living adjustment to certain annuitants of the Teacher Retirement System of Texas."

Cost to Taxpayers: This amendment will cost taxpayers $5 Billion

Provides a cost-of-living adjustment to the teachers who are receiving retirement benefits.

Vote Recommendation – NEUTRAL – Everyone likes teachers! It’s hard to say no to helping them cope with inflation since they have not had a raise in several years. But it will cost the state billions. So you decide. Just know that if you vote against this amendment, it means that you hate teachers.

Proposition 10 – SJR 87 "The constitutional amendment to authorize the legislature to exempt from ad valorem taxation equipment or inventory held by a manufacturer of medical or biomedical products to protect the Texas healthcare network and strengthen our medical supply chain."

Cost to Taxpayers: This amendment will cost taxpayers $29 million in the first 2 years, then approximately $40 million annually.

Like proposition #2, this amendment grants property tax exemptions to a certain industry – medical supply equipment.

Vote Recommendation – AGAINST - exempting certain types of businesses from taxes puts a greater burden on the remaining taxpayers. Exemptions like this have governments picking winners and losers.

Proposition 11 – SJR 32 "The constitutional amendment authorizing the legislature to permit conservation and reclamation districts in El Paso County to issue bonds supported by ad valorem taxes to fund the development and maintenance of parks and recreational facilities."

Cost to Taxpayers: According to the TLO fiscal analysis, this amendment has no fiscal impact to the state other than the cost of publication. It potentially could have a financial impact on the citizens of El Paso County in the form of higher property taxes to support bonds.

How did this end up as a constitutional amendment? It feels like a local issue. But in 2003, the constitution was amended, giving conservation & reclamation districts in certain counties the ability to issue bonds for parks and recreation. El Paso was not included, so this amendment adds El Paso County to the counties enumerated in the legislation.

Vote Recommendation – AGAINST – we generally oppose all bonds, and this amendment would provide additional capacity for El Paso County to increase taxes to fund parks and recreation facilities with new bonds. Texans are taxed enough already. Even in El Paso County!

Proposition 12 – HJR 134 "The constitutional amendment providing for the abolition of the office of county treasurer in Galveston County."

Cost to Taxpayers: According to the TLO fiscal analysis, this amendment has no fiscal impact for the State. Galveston County anticipates savings if the amendment passes.

This amendment would abolish the position of County Treasurer in Galveston County, which was requested by the current County Treasurer of Galveston County in the last campaign. In order for the amendment to pass, it needs not only a majority vote of the whole State, but also a majority vote in Galveston County.

Vote Recommendation – NEUTRAL – The current Treasurer campaigned on a promise to eliminate his position, which prompted this legislative action. Since one less government position means less government, it’s probably a good thing. So, my position is NEUTRAL, leaning towards FOR. (If I lived in Galveston County, this would be a total FOR)

Proposition 13 – HJR 107 "The constitutional amendment to increase the mandatory age of retirement for state justices and judges."

Cost to Taxpayers: Indeterminate, since we cannot know how many judges would elect to serve longer.

This amendment raises the current mandatory retirement age for State Justices and Judges from 75 to 79.

Vote Recommendation – I DON’T KNOW! – This is a hard one for me. While it’s nice to take advantage of the collective wisdom of the older judges, there is the risk of aging issues affecting the judicial system. The State could benefit from new, younger candidates, so I’ll leave this one as NEUTRAL (because I can’t make up my mind! You decide.)

Proposition 14 – SJR 74 "The constitutional amendment providing for the creation of the centennial parks conservation fund to be used for the creation and improvement of state parks."

Cost to Taxpayers: This amendment will cost taxpayers $1 Billion

Another “fund” amendment so I’ll refer you to “fund” amendment comments above.

Vote Recommendation – NO – enough said.



Here's what Bill Peacock has to say about the 7 "fund" amendments:

None of these amendments would do much, if anything, to solve problems we are facing or improve the Texas economy. They are simply corporate welfare, with a little university welfare thrown in, designed to deceive voters into thinking they are serious solutions to our problems. Also, in almost every case, the Legislature is telling us they don’t trust markets–and the people in them–to work out solutions to our problems; they will fix the problems for us. Additionally, they take all this money out from underneath the constitutional limit on spending growth. It is just a free pass for the Legislature to spend our money.



Not only are these constitutional amendments greatly flawed, but they also will take out of circulation close to $12 billion Texas could use to buy down the property tax. That would double the amount the Legislature is likely to provide this year.



We appreciate this information provided by Bill Peacock, and we encourage True Texans to vote wisely.



That's all for now - stay informed, and stay engaged!

For Texas always,

Fran Rhodes, President

PS: Something to note - on all of the amendments that have "no fiscal impact beyond cost of publication" the fiscal analysis has the cost of publication at $204,406 per amendment. Does that mean that all of these amendments pass, the total cost of publication would be $2,861,684? I don't do math 😊 but if that's right, it might be reason enough to vote AGAINST!



True Texas Project works hard to train and engage activists.
Can you help?
We are 100% donation-based.
Click here to donate to our cause.





Tired of getting so many emails? Please be patient!


We put the location in the subject of every event email so that you can easily delete without opening it, but you know what is a better idea? Forward the event to those you know in that area! We send all event emails to all subscribers because so many True Texans do just that... share the invites! We hope you will too, but if not, kindly just delete. No need to send in a complaint or unsubscribe. There truly is a method to our madness as we work hard to build the army across this great big state! Sometimes we send emails only to specific counties. If you want to update what counties are on your profile, please click here.
BONUS TIP: remove the "unsubscribe" line at the bottom of your email before you forward it! Otherwise the recipient may unsubscribe YOU!



True Texas Project works hard to train and engage activists.
Can you help?
We are 100% donation-based.
Click here to donate to our cause.





Tired of getting so many emails? Please be patient!


We put the location in the subject of every event email so that you can easily delete without opening it, but you know what is a better idea? Forward the event to those you know in that area! We send all event emails to all subscribers because so many True Texans do just that... share the invites! We hope you will too, but if not, kindly just delete. No need to send in a complaint or unsubscribe. There truly is a method to our madness as we work hard to build the army across this great big state! Sometimes we send emails only to specific counties. If you want to update what counties are on your profile, please click here.
BONUS TIP: remove the "unsubscribe" line at the bottom of your email before you forward it! Otherwise the recipient may unsubscribe YOU!

This email was sent to [email protected]. Click here to [link removed].