August 14, 2023
Permission to republish original opeds and cartoons granted.
New Data: High School Boys Twice as Likely to Identify as Conservative as Liberal
by Manzanita Miller
According to a large survey of high school graduates, the share of young men identifying as conservative is rapidly increasing compared to previous decades. The left loves to trumpet their successes with “the youth vote”, but the reality is there is a growing gender gap that will have broad-reaching political implications for decades to come.
New research from the University of Michigan’s Monitoring the Future survey of 12th grade high school students shows just how vast the gender partisan gap has grown among young men and women.
The survey reveals data going back as far as 1975 tracking the political ideology of young men and women entering the voter pool, and the results are startling. Since approximately 2010, the share of young men identifying as conservative has skyrocketed, while the share identifying as liberal has dropped to the lowest point on record.
Today, young men are twice as likely to identify as conservative, with about a quarter of male 12th graders saying they are conservative or very conservative, while a mere 13% say they are liberal or very liberal.
This marks a notable transformation in the political perspectives of boys. While the share of boys identifying as liberal has been mostly declining since the 1970’s, there was a brief spike in liberal identity among young men in 2010 under President Obama and in 2016 just as Trump took office, but otherwise young men identifying as liberal has steadily fallen.
For young women, an opposite scenario has played out, with 12th grade women reaching the highest proportion of self-identified liberals on record in 2020, and that number declining incrementally in 2022.
The survey shows the share of 12th-grade girls who identify as liberal rose 11-percentage points from 19% in 2012 to 30% in 2022. The share of young women who identify as conservative sat at just 11% in the 2022 survey, down ever so slightly from 2020. The data shows the peak of young women identifying as conservative occurred in 2005 under George W. Bush and has been dwindling since then.
However, the largest group of high school boys and girls declined to share their political views, something that is not surprising in the age of censorship and cancel culture.
Regardless of those unwilling to share or unsure of their political views, there is a growing gender gap among young people that does not appear to be declining.
Gallup Polling reveals that 44% of women aged eighteen to twenty-nine now align themselves with liberal views, marking the highest figure in twenty years.
In contrast, only a quarter of young men between eighteen and twenty-nine embrace a liberal identity. The proportion of young men identifying as liberal has experienced fluctuations over the past 25 years, showing an overall decline. Meanwhile, the percentage of young women identifying as liberal has consistently risen.
Data from a 2022 Meredith College poll also reveals that while Gen Z may embrace more liberal viewpoints on issues like abortion and LGBTQ+ issues, young men exhibit notably less liberal perspectives compared to women. While nearly half of Gen Z wants to expand abortion access, this stance is predominantly driven by young women. In contrast, Gen Z men are less inclined to support such an expansion.
The Meredith College findings also reveal that a considerable portion of Gen Z men adhere to traditional notions of gender roles. More than 40% of young men expressed a preference for a male political leader, compared to 35% of Gen Z women favoring a female political leader. Among all age groups, Gen Z men exhibited the highest preference for a male political leader. Professor David McLennan, who directed the Meredith poll, noted:
“The results from our work suggest there is a strong conservative element within Gen Z on policy issues…a shift to more traditional views among the male population.”
Democrats lost four points with voters under thirty between 2018 and 2022, so their edge is declining. However, the gender gap is an important variable to watch in the next presidential election, considering President Biden has been struggling with young voters overall. Recent NYT/Siena polling shows Biden’s lead over Trump has shrunk 14-percentage points compared to his lead in 2020 exit polls, indicating Biden will have an uphill battle recouping young voters. If the growing body of research on gender and ideology is any indication, Biden will struggle most with young men.
View online: https://dailytorch.com/2023/08/new-data-high-school-boys-twice-as-likely-to-identify-as-conservative-as-liberal/
Video: One of America’s safest counties is warning residents to be prepared for civil unrest!
Watch now: https://youtu.be/XOteTWGnres
Video: This Could Reelect Donald Trump
Watch now: https://youtu.be/PknPHGLl2D8
Video: Hunter Biden Investigation: Garland Appoints Special Counsel
Watch now: https://youtube.com/live/R2RAVED3qXk
Mice Lobby Against the Better Mousetrap
by Rick Manning
Standing up against a government which will crush the dreams of everyday Americans just to assert its power was the inspiration for my coming to Washington, D.C. many years ago.
The idea that an inventor could build a better mousetrap and the mice could hire a lobbying firm to get Congress or a regulator to ban it was abhorrent to this young man fresh on the heels of reading Atlas Shrugged. Yet, that has unfortunately become the norm in an America which is barely recognizable.
A perfect example of this phenomena is contained within the version of the Federal Aviation Administration reauthorization bill passed by the House of Representatives.
The issue seems trivial, but it is a pure example of the federal government squashing someone, just because they can. The FAA requires tail identification numbers on aircraft at a cost of $10 with about a million separate combinations available.
One entrepreneur figured out that some combinations might be worth more than others. He invested thousands of dollars in purchasing the rights to combinations he believed would be more valuable than the $10 price he paid for them, leaving around half a million combinations with the FAA for those who just wanted a number. He then set-up the apparatus to auction those numbers that he believed would have higher demand to those who were willing to pay for the vanity numbers.
It turned out that the entrepreneur was right, and those who own private jets were willing to pay to get what they considered a more prestigious or personal tail number.
But the inevitable occurred, and the mice decided that the entrepreneur should not be allowed to exist and whined to their trade association and members of Congress.
Even though, the FAA still has an inventory of around half a million unused tail numbers up for grabs for $10 , the House of Representatives acted at the insistence of the mice that they must crush this inventor by making his business illegal.
Of course, the private airplane owners could have simply refused to pay more than $10 for a tail number and destroyed the entrepreneurs business due to lack of interest.
But instead, we now have the House of Representatives on record in favor of squashing the innovator who saw a market, risked his money to see if his idea would work and then implemented a system which uses supply and demand market pricing to determine the true value of any given number.
In a world which is on fire with the Biden administration assaulting freedom from every corner, this one, small current attempt by the ever-expanding administrative state and its congressional allies to crush a few people who are now competing in this market may seem unimportant. I don’t agree.
It is worthwhile to fight for the little guy who faces destruction of his/her dreams and livelihood because the wealthy and powerful mice complained.
When I was a much younger man, Texas Senator Phil Gramm used to refer to Dickie Flatt, a constituent who owned a local printing business as the archetype independent small businessman having to overcome the burdens of taxes and regulations. Gramm used to ask the question, “Is it worth taking it out of Dickie’s pocket” when considering whether a federal government program should be approved.
However, the Senate has the chance to just say no to the idea that Congress should shut down a legitimate business where no one is coerced or compelled to consume the product just because they can.
The Senate should apply this slightly altered Dickie Flatt standard to the FAA Tail Number issue. Is it worth destroying the American dream for someone whose only fault is that he figured out a way to effectively organize and re-sell certain FAA tail numbers just because they can?
Anyone who claims to be a limited government conservative must answer no to this question, and if they don’t, their constituents can rightfully ask, am I next?
View online: https://dailytorch.com/2023/08/mice-lobby-against-the-better-mousetrap/