‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌
[link removed] [[link removed]] HelloJohn,

I’m Virginia Canter, CREW’s Chief Ethics Counsel. I spent decades working in the federal government under presidents of both parties. For most of my legal career, I had faith in the Supreme Court and would not have questioned their ethics or impartiality. Several recent scandals have shaken that confidence.

Earlier this year, I spoke with the ProPublica reporters who broke the stories about Justice Clarence Thomas’s unreported luxury travel with Harlan Crow, his secretive real estate deals and the tuition for his grand nephew.

I heard from the reporters again later, this time about an unreported fishing trip Justice Samuel Alito took with billionaire Paul Singer. These stories made clear that ethics issues on the Supreme Court were widespread and longstanding.

Now, Justice Alito is in the news again. This time, he spoke to reporters with the Wall Street Journal , and made this statement:

"I know this is a con­tro­ver­sial view, but I’m will­ing to say it... No pro­vi­sion in the Con­sti­tu­tion gives [Congress] the au­thor­ity to reg­u­late the Supreme Court—pe­riod."This isn’t just a controversial statement. It’s unequivocally wrong.

Of course Congress has the authority to regulate the ethical obligations of the Supreme Court: Congress not only sets the size of the court and selects the start of the Supreme Court term, but Congress also wrote the very oath the justices are required to take upon their appointment to the Court. That oath obligates them to “administer justice without respect to persons,” to “do equal right to the poor and to the rich,” and “to faithfully and impartially discharge and perform” the duties of their judicial office.

ButJohn, there’s something bigger behind Alito’s message—a suggestion that the justices of the Supreme Court answer to no one, and that they are above the law.

That couldn’t be further from the truth, and it’s time for Congress to make that clear.

For years, CREW has been fighting for an enforceable, binding Code of Conduct for Supreme Court justices. We’ve testified before Congress about it, submitted testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee and sent letters, all in an attempt to bring ethics reform to the highest court in the land.

Help CREW continue our work fighting for ethics reform on the Supreme Court with a donation today → [[link removed]]If you've saved your payment information with ActBlue Express, your donation will go through immediately:

Donate $5 → [[link removed]]
Donate $25 → [[link removed]]

Donate $50 → [[link removed]]
Donate $100 → [[link removed]]

Donate $250 → [[link removed]]
Other → [[link removed]]

Alito’s comments came shortly after the Senate Judiciary Committee voted to advance legislation that would require the court to establish a code of ethics – and weeks after he and his colleague on the bench, Clarence Thomas, were exposed for accepting luxury vacation and lavish gifts from wealthy politically-oriented donors who had business before the court.

Here are two other key facts that make Alito’s statements about the ethics of the Supreme Court even more concerning:

*
David
Rivkin—who
sat
down
with
Alito
for
four
hours
to
write
this
Wall
Street
Journal
article—is
an
appellate
lawyer
representing
a
client
with
a
major
case
coming
before
the
Supreme
Court
next
term.
*
Not
only
is
Alito
wrong,
he’s
cherry
picking
which
parts
of
the
law
to
cite.
When
he
claimed
in
his
first
op-ed
that
he
had
no
obligation
to
report
“personal
hospitality,”
he
neglected
to
include
key
language
laid
out
in
the
law
that
limits
the
use
of
that
exception—which
applied
in
his
case.

John, in Justice Alito’s case, his free fishing trip to Alaska onboard Paul Singer’s private plane clearly should have been reported, and his failure to do so is wrong. But what’s also concerning is Alito’s PR campaign after the fact, which reveals a disdain for ethics, checks and balances and a willingness to mislead the American people.

Supreme Court justices should be held to the highest ethical standards of all judges, not the lowest.

We need real reform to save the legitimacy of the Supreme Court. Help CREW fight for ethics reform by making a donation to our work today → [[link removed]]Thank you,

Virginia Canter
Chief Ethics Counsel
CREW

DONATE → [[link removed]]
Make sure this email goes to your inbox. Add [email protected] to your address book.
Email is a key way for us to stay in touch and make sure you get the latest updates from our campaign. But if you would like to unsubscribe, click here [[link removed]] .
If you'd like to donate to support our efforts, please click here → [[link removed]]
© Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington 2020–2023
CFC 42218
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington
PO Box 14596
Washington, DC 20044
United States