View this post on the web at [link removed]

You can’t claim a product is “safe” if you know it causes heart damage, but you can’t explain how your product causes it. You also have reason to know your product could cause harm if you negotiate indemnity for yourself into a secret contract that shields you from liability should your experimental product injure or kill people—or protects you from fraud you commit during your own clinical trials.
Would you buy a car if it was reportedly involved in car accidents—even if “rare”—and the company didn’t know why? Would you sign on to a house loan if you didn’t know the contract terms? Would you purchase a car if you knew that if its brakes stopped working on the highway, you not only couldn’t hold the manufacturer responsible, you’d be on the hook financially for your own injuries caused by their conduct or product?
What if the car manufacturer had a history of fraud and their cars had previously injured many people—would you be okay with being forced to drive it?
No reasonable person would. Yet this is the type of common sense we are supposed to throw out the window for COVID-19 vaccines.
I think I speak for many when I say I enjoy nothing more than watching Pfizer executives squirm when they’re forced to answer questions about their COVID vaccines—questions that should have been asked and answered years ago.
Australian authorities from the Senate Education and Employment Legislation Committee on August 3 grilled two Pfizer executives about myocarditis caused by their COVID vaccine.
For a brief moment, it appeared there was actually some sort of effort to hold the company accountable for creating a vaccine that has not only caused heart damage in young people—who weren’t even at risk of severe COVID-19 in the first place—but has killed or permanently disabled tens of thousands of Americans and what we can reasonably assume are millions of people globally.
(Here’s a great clip if you want to watch this exchange in all its glory: [link removed] [ [link removed] ])
Sen. Malcolm Roberts took the gold with a straightforward question [ [link removed] ] for Pfizer:
“Can you explain why the vaccine causes myocarditis and pericarditis?”
For those who don’t know, myocarditis [ [link removed] ] is inflammation of the heart muscle that can lead to cardiac arrhythmia and death. According to the National Organization for Rare Disorders [ [link removed] ], myocarditis can result from infections, but “more commonly, the myocarditis is a result of the body’s immune reaction to the initial heart damage.”
Pericarditis [ [link removed] ] is inflammation of the tissue surrounding the heart that can cause sharp chest pain and other symptoms.
Each time this question was asked, re-asked, re-worded, and asked again, the Pfizer executive who decided to take one for the home team dodged the question by attempting to argue that myocarditis is no big deal because it’s “rare” (which isn’t true) and only “temporarily associated” with its vaccine (also not true).
Let’s be clear…there is no such thing as “mild” heart damage.
When asked again to explain the mechanism by which its vaccine causes heart damage, Pfizer’s answer was to reiterate the same sad marketing line repeatedly: The shot is safe and effective.
In the name of common sense, Roberts asked how they could know the vaccine is safe and effective if they don’t know how it’s causing heart damage. Once again, Pfizer was non-responsive, which in and of itself was a response.
Are they actually clueless about how their vaccine causes myocarditis—which would be a huge problem, or do they know and just aren’t wanting to incriminate themselves and their multi-billion-dollar industry? After all, people are dying. But explaining how your product causes heart damage could lead us down the trail of understanding how other adverse events are occurring and how much Pfizer knew and when they knew it.
In essence, Pfizer is “pleading the fifth.”
During the same interview, Pfizer refused to answer questions about its secret “confidential” contracts with national governments that indemnify it from the harms caused by its products and admitted their own employees were vaccinated with a “special batch” of vaccines. Were they placebos? That’s possible. Nobody knows.
Pfizer also, in a shocking exchange [ [link removed] ] with another Senator, disagreed that people were “forced” to get vaccinated. Where have they been? Perhaps they are concerned we may find out they had something to do with the barrage of mandates.
Megan Redshaw is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Unsubscribe [link removed]?