All freedoms hang together.

View this email in your browser ([link removed])
[link removed]



** For Immediate Release: August 4, 2023
------------------------------------------------------------


** Appeals Court Agrees: First Amendment Requires Jail Officials to Treat All Religious Beliefs Equally
------------------------------------------------------------

CHICAGO, IL — Recognizing that the First Amendment requires the government to treat all religious beliefs equally ([link removed]) , a federal appeals court has ruled against a Wisconsin jail for leaving a Muslim prisoner no choice but to pray next to the toilet in his cell while jail officers allowed Christian inmates to gather for Bible studies and prayer in a communal area.

Agreeing with The Rutherford Institute’s arguments in Emad v. Dodge County ([link removed]) that government officials should not be allowed to feign ignorance or use qualified immunity to shield them from liability when they violate the First Amendment, especially when there is a clear constitutional violation and plenty of time for government officials to consider their course of action, the Seventh Circuit reversed ([link removed]) a lower court’s grant of qualified immunity to jail officials, stating that “if free exercise [of religion] in jail means anything, it means that jailers…cannot treat inmates differently based on religion.”

“The First Amendment not only affirms the right to religious freedom for people of all faiths, but it also requires that the government treat all faiths equally and not favoring or disfavoring one over the other,” said constitutional attorney John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute and author of Battlefield America: The War on the American People ([link removed]) . “This is the slippery slope that affects us all, whether you’re talking about religious freedom, free speech or privacy: if the government is allowed to deny freedom to one segment of the citizenry, it will eventually extend that tyranny to the rest of us.”
MAKE THE GOVERNMENT PLAY BY THE RULES OF THE CONSTITUTION: SUPPORT THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM ([link removed])

Although the Dodge County Detention Facility in Wisconsin has a policy prohibiting “personal worship” in the dayroom common areas, jail officers permitted Christian detainees to participate in Bible study and communal prayer in the dayroom. Emad, a practicing Muslim, was a civil immigration detainee at the jail from March 2018 to May 2019. As part of Emad’s religious practice, he prays at five prescribed times each day. Emad believes that such prayers must be done in a clean and pure environment; thus, prayer in a room with a toilet is prohibited and considered unclean. Additionally, Emad believes he is required by Islam to attend a weekly sermon and congregational prayer with two or more people on Fridays. Emad’s requests to pray outside of his cell in an area without a toilet were denied by jail officials, as was Emad’s request to pray with other Muslim detainees. Emad sued the jail for substantially burdening his First Amendment right to the free exercise of his religion. While the trial
court found that the jail did not have a sufficient justification for refusing to allow Emad to pray in other areas outside his cell, it granted qualified immunity to jail officials and dismissed the case.

On appeal, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals reversed ([link removed]) the lower court’s ruling, acknowledging “the robust legal protection that attends to…the right to worship free of discrimination based on one’s choice of faith." While Emad secured a religious freedom victory for inmates before the Seventh Circuit, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal in Rodriguez v. Burnside arising out of an Eleventh Circuit ruling, which The Rutherford Institute warned ([link removed]) would effectively validate unconstitutional jail policies by reducing standards to create a “test under which the government will undoubtedly always win” in its refusals to grant inmates’ requests for religious accommodations.

Paul R. Steadman, Emma Cone Roddy, and Sean O’Neal of DLA Piper helped advance the amicus arguments in Emad v. Dodge County ([link removed]) , which is available at www.rutherford.org ([link removed]) . Theodore A. Howard, Krystal B. Swendsboe, and William Turner of Wiley Rein advanced the amicus arguments in Rodriguez v. Burnside ([link removed]) on behalf of The Rutherford Institute and the Jewish Coalition for Religious Liberty.

The Rutherford Institute ([link removed]) , a nonprofit civil liberties organization, provides legal assistance at no charge to individuals whose constitutional rights have been threatened or violated and educates the public on a wide spectrum of issues affecting their freedoms.

This press release is also available at www.rutherford.org ([link removed]) .

Source: [link removed]
[link removed] Share ([link removed])
[link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Frutherford%2Fappeals-court-agrees-first-amendment-requires-jail-officials-to-treat-all-religious-beliefs-equally Tweet ([link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Frutherford%2Fappeals-court-agrees-first-amendment-requires-jail-officials-to-treat-all-religious-beliefs-equally)
[link removed] Forward ([link removed])
CLICK HERE TO MAKE A TAX-DEDUCTIBLE DONATION ([link removed])

To donate via PayPal, please click below:
[link removed]

============================================================
** Follow us on Facebook ([link removed])
** Follow us on Facebook ([link removed])
** Follow us on Twitter ([link removed])
** Follow us on Twitter ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
CONTACT INFORMATION
Nisha Whitehead
(434) 978-3888 ext. 604
** [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])

THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE
Post Office Box 7482
Charlottesville, VA 22906-7482
Phone: (434) 978-3888
** www.rutherford.org ([link removed])

Copyright © 2023 The Rutherford Institute, All rights reserved.

You are receiving this email because of your interest in the work of The Rutherford Institute. Founded in 1982 by constitutional attorney and author John W. Whitehead, The Rutherford Institute is a civil liberties organization that provides free legal services to people whose constitutional and human rights have been threatened or violated. To discontinue your membership electronically, or if you feel you are receiving this message in error, please follow the link below.

Under the regulations of the United States Internal Revenue Service, The Rutherford Institute is incorporated as a 501(c)(3) tax exempt nonprofit organization. Donations to support The Rutherford Institute’s legal and educational work help to safeguard the constitutional rights of all Americans. Donations are tax-deductible. In compliance with general industry standards of a nonprofit organization, the Institute is audited annually by an independent accounting firm.

** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])

** update subscription preferences ([link removed])