WHAT WE'RE READING
With the 2024 election steadily approaching and major social media platforms restructuring their formats and policies, a recent federal court injunction will prohibit various federal agencies and officials from communicating directly with social media companies. As a result, officials have expressed concerns about a potential “chilling effect” from the injunction that could impact how the federal government and states might address election-related disinformation.
CNN has more:
“The trouble is that in many situations, the dividing line between domestic speech and foreign influence is not immediately obvious. A domestically originated false narrative can often be amplified by malicious foreign actors or vice versa, said Gowri Ramachandran, a senior counsel at the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University. And during Russia’s attempted election meddling in 2016, disinformation agents posed as American social media users but the nature of the deception did not become clear until much later after a great deal of forensic effort.
“They had to do a lot of work to figure out and trace back the actual origins of where that content was. Well, the government doesn’t necessarily have those capabilities to do that back-end work that the social media companies do. But this injunction, if you’re a very cautious lawyer, you’re going to be like, ‘Well, you can’t tell me 100% that it’s foreign, and it could be domestic and that could be against this injunction.’”—Katie Harbath, a former Facebook official who helped lead the company’s global election efforts until 2021.
Even if the injunction is overturned, ongoing litigation could still prove to be its own source of electoral disruption in 2024. State election officials are also paying close attention to this injunction with an eye towards their own anti-disinformation efforts.
|