[Good journalism demands one-on-one encounters with candidates,
questions that speak to people’s actual concerns, real-time
factchecking. If candidates can’t agree to a platform that holds
them accountable, they don’t deserve a media platform at all.]
[[link removed]]

CNN TOWN HALLS DO DEMOCRACY NO FAVORS  
[[link removed]]


 

Julie Hollar
July 19, 2023
FAIR [[link removed]]

*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

_ Good journalism demands one-on-one encounters with candidates,
questions that speak to people’s actual concerns, real-time
factchecking. If candidates can’t agree to a platform that holds
them accountable, they don’t deserve a media platform at all. _

Donald Trump and Kaitlin Collins at a CNN town hall (5/10/23).,

 

After its embarrassing town hall with Donald Trump, which helped
precipitate the downfall of chair and CEO Chris Licht
(FAIR.ORG, 6/8/23
[[link removed]]), CNN has
doubled down on the format—at least for Republican candidates. Since
Trump’s May 10
[[link removed]] appearance,
the network has featured GOP candidates Nikki Haley (6/4/23
[[link removed]]),
Mike Pence (6/7/23
[[link removed]])
and Chris Christie (6/12/23
[[link removed]]),
with more promised. Curiously, however, no offers to Democratic or
third party candidates have been announced, which prompts the
question: What purpose do these town halls serve?

In the case of the Trump town hall, CNN‘s decision appeared to be
entirely self-serving. Having worked to move the network rightward
[[link removed]],
Licht had led CNN to “its historic nadir,” as described in
the ATLANTIC (6/2/23
[[link removed]]),
in terms of both ratings and newsroom morale. The Trump town hall was
meant to be the “big win” that would turn those things around.

Of course, the plan backfired. Trump had a field day, spewing lies and
trampling over and insulting host Kaitlan Collins to the wild cheers
of the crowd. The entire affair read as a giant campaign rally
sponsored by CNN, aided by the floor manager’s instructions
[[link removed]] to
the audience that while applause was permitted, booing was not. While
immediate ratings spiked (AXIOS, 5/11/23
[[link removed]])
they then plunged even further (TV INSIDER, 5/16/23
[[link removed]]),
as the network’s reputation immediately suffered and morale hit rock
bottom. Licht was soon given the boot (FAIR.ORG, 6/8/23
[[link removed]]).

‘In the public’s interest’

[Anderson Cooper on CNN]

_CNN‘s Anderson Cooper (5/11/23
[[link removed]])
suggested that critics of the Trump town hall were upset because
“maybe you haven’t been paying attention to him since he left
office.”_

But CNN anchor Anderson Cooper (5/11/23
[[link removed]])
would have you believe the network was actually putting democracy and
the public interest first. He went on the air in a huff to accuse the
network’s many critics of trying to stifle debate and refusing to
face disagreeable realities. “Many of you felt CNN shouldn’t
have given [Trump] any platform to speak,” he scolded. “Do you
think staying in your silo and only listening to people you agree with
is going to make that person go away?”

Fellow anchor Jake Tapper agreed. Speaking on a NEW YORK magazine
podcast (ON WITH KARA SWISHER, 7/10/23
[[link removed]]),
Tapper argued that the town hall format for Trump was “in the
public’s interest.”

Some outside of CNN stepped in to defend the outlet’s decision as
well. The NEW YORK TIMES‘ Maureen Dowd (5/13/23
[[link removed]]),
for instance, wrote that “the task is to challenge Trump and expose
him, not to put our fingers in our ears and sing ‘la, la, la.'”
She approvingly quoted former Obama adviser David Axelrod
[[link removed]]:

It strikes me as fundamentally wrong to deny voters a chance to see
candidates, and particularly front-running candidates, answering
challenging questions from journalists and citizens in open forums….
You can’t save democracy from people who would shred its norms by
shredding democratic norms yourselves.

But these specious arguments are easily dispensed with. What
democratic norms require offering a serial liar a town hall stuffed
full of supporters, in which the audience is instructed that applause
is welcomed but booing is forbidden? In what way does that serve the
public interest?

After four years of the Trump presidency and the democracy-shaking
[[link removed]] transition
out of it, CNN would be hard-pressed to find a living soul who
doesn’t know exactly who Trump and his supporters are and how they
can be expected to behave. That the town hall was devoid of thoughtful
policy discussions but replete with insults and falsehoods should have
surprised no one. And despite her efforts
[[link removed]], CNN‘s
Collins had no chance of pinning down Trump in any useful way on any
of his lies or contradictions in such a format.

PLATFORM FOR FALSEHOODS

[CNN: Fact checking Nikki Haley’s CNN town hall in Iowa]

_CNN.COM (6/4/23
[[link removed]])
assured readers that former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley
“correctly cited a variety of facts and figures”—as though this
were a noteworthy thing for a politician to do._

But the problem goes beyond Trump. Trump’s challengers have all
broken with the former president to some degree, though few will
risk alienating
[[link removed]] his
followers by forcefully denouncing his lies. Still, they represent a
slightly more reality-based GOP than Trump, such that their town hall
appearances might be expected to meet the extremely low bar of not
being as filled with disinformation as Trump’s.

Yet CNN‘s own factchecks of its subsequent GOP town halls showed
Haley, Pence and Christie were permitted numerous falsehoods without
real-time challenge by their journalist hosts.

Haley, for instance, claimed that crime is at “all-time highs”
(judged by CNN factcheckers—6/4/23
[[link removed]]—
to be “not even close to true”), that _Roe v. Wade_ made
“abortion anytime, anywhere for any reason” the law of the land
(“not true”), and that the US “is very good when it comes to
emissions,” while the Chinese and Indians “are the problem”
(seriously misleading, as the US is second to China in total current
emissions, with India well in third place; the US has much higher
total historical emissions, and much higher per capita emissions, than
China or India).

Tapper, the host, did not push back against any of these claims.

Or take Pence’s town hall, in which he announced that inflation is
“at a 40-year high” (nope—”the inflation rate has fallen for
10 straight months,” noted the CNN fact check—6/7/23
[[link removed]]),
that the Trump/Pence family separations began “under Obama” and
Trump and Pence simply “continued” it (“not true at all”), and
that their administration “reduced CO2 emissions beyond what the
previous administration had committed to just through American
innovation, through expanding American energy and natural gas.”
(That one
[[link removed]] CNN didn’t
factcheck, but it’s terribly false
[[link removed]].)

Host Dana Bash did not challenge any of these statements, either.

TOWN HALLS FOR GOP ONLY

[Chris Christie and Anderson Cooper at a CNN town hall]

_Former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie was given a town hall of his
own by CNN (6/12/23
[[link removed]]),
despite having the support of approximately 1 in every 40 likely
Republican primary voters._

In contrast to its apparent policy of handing out GOP town halls like
candy, CNN has announced no plans to give any Democratic candidates
town halls. While Biden has the power of incumbency that the GOP field
lacks, he does have at least two announced challengers: Robert F.
Kennedy, Jr., and Marianne Williamson. Meanwhile, Cornel West has
declared a presidential run with the Green Party.

Kennedy and Williamson, with recent polling averages
[[link removed]] of
14.6% and 5.6% respectively among Democratic primary voters, have been
polling higher than either
[[link removed]] Haley
(3.5%) or Christie (2.3%). (Pence’s latest average is 6.0%.)

But Kennedy, whose campaign seems to be driven largely by right-wing
funders and media as a spoiler (see FAIR.ORG, 6/29/23
[[link removed]]),
is an outspoken conspiracy theorist on issues ranging from vaccines
[[link removed]] to
the climate crisis
[[link removed]] to 5g
networks
[[link removed]].
Williamson, a self-help author with mostly progressive
[[link removed]] politics,
long encouraged doubts on vaccines and anti-depressants (VOX, 7/31/19
[[link removed]]),
though she has since at least partially rejected
[[link removed]] those
positions.

CNN‘s Tapper, despite his full-throated support for the CNN Trump
town hall, has declared
[[link removed]] that
he would not host a town hall with Kennedy because of his conspiracy
theories. (Upstart NEWSNATION—6/28/23
[[link removed]]—did
give Kennedy such an opportunity, the only network so far to do so.)

One of the worst possible ways

Biden may not traffic in conspiracy theories or attempt the level of
dishonesty Trump revels in, but his claims regularly require
factchecking as well. Virtually all politicians’ claims do—and our
corporate media have never been up to the task (FAIR.ORG, 8/24/20
[[link removed]]). But live,
single-candidate town halls before a strictly friendly audience are
indisputably one of the worst possible ways
[[link removed]] for
news outlets to help the public make an informed choice at the ballot
box.

Holding a politician accountable to the facts across the universe of
possible topics is a herculean task for a journalist in the best of
circumstances, and impossible in a town hall format that’s set up
more like a campaign rally than a serious journalistic forum. In 2020,
Donald Trump’s strategy of overwhelming interlocutors with lies
rendered even the debate format essentially useless
(FAIR.ORG, 10/2/20
[[link removed]])—and
that was with an opponent and a respectful audience.

The public needs to understand the candidates they’ll be choosing
from next year, which means news outlets must offer them a platform.
But the _kind_ of platform offereCreate d is crucial. In the Trump
era, town halls simply don’t offer the tools necessary to hold
politicians accountable, whether that politician is Trump or Kennedy,
DeSantis or Biden.

Good journalism demands one-on-one encounters with the candidates,
with incisive questions that speak to people’s actual needs and
concerns, and real-time factchecking (or a taped format with
factchecking provided prior to airing). If candidates can’t agree to
a platform that can hold them accountable, they don’t deserve to
have a media platform at all.

_Julie Hollar is FAIR’s senior analyst and managing editor. Julie
has a Ph.D. in Political Science from the Graduate Center of the City
University of New York._

_FAIR’S WORK IS SUSTAINED BY OUR GENEROUS CONTRIBUTORS, WHO ALLOW US
TO REMAIN INDEPENDENT. DONATE
[[link removed]] TODAY TO BE A PART OF THIS
IMPORTANT MISSION._

* CNN town hall
[[link removed]]
* fact checkers
[[link removed]]
* Journalism
[[link removed]]

*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

 

 

 

INTERPRET THE WORLD AND CHANGE IT

 

 

Submit via web
[[link removed]]

Submit via email
Frequently asked questions
[[link removed]]

Manage subscription
[[link removed]]

Visit xxxxxx.org
[[link removed]]

Twitter [[link removed]]

Facebook [[link removed]]

 




[link removed]

To unsubscribe, click the following link:
[link removed]