Despite White House invitation to rebuff refugee resettlement, most governors sign on; A look at the complex smuggler-migrant relationship
Migration Policy Institute Logo
To ensure email delivery directly to your inbox, please add [email protected] to your address book and migrationpolicy.org to your safe senders list.
Migration Information Source Logo
February 17, 2020


Also in the Newsletter

Have You Read?

Brazilian Immigrants in the United States

The Emerging Crisis: Is Famine Returning as a Major Driver of Migration?

Ebola Outbreak Rekindles Debate on Restricting Admissions to the United States on Health Grounds


Keep up with the Source

Subscribe
Not on the list? Continue receiving these updates by subscribing today.

RSS Feed
Subscribe to the RSS feed to keep up with the latest articles.

Follow MPI


New from MPI

An Uneven Welcome: Latin American and Caribbean Responses to Venezuelan and Nicaraguan Migration
By Andrew Selee and Jessica Bolter

Bienvenidas asimétricas: Respuestas de América Latina y el Caribe a la migración venezolana y nicaragüense
Por Andrew Selee y Jessica Bolter

Latin America & Caribbean Migration Portal

The Patchy Landscape of State English Learner Policies under ESSA
By Leslie Villegas and Delia Pompa


Source-Smugglers-2020 Feature
Ally or Exploiter? The Smuggler-Migrant Relationship Is a Complex One
As highly industrialized countries ramp up their border controls, human smugglers are playing a central role in moving migrants through key migration corridors around the world. Despite the illicit nature of their work and being cast as villains in the public eye, smugglers have complex, multifaceted relationships with their clients. At times, the relationship can be mutually beneficial or even lifesaving; at others, it can be predatory and dangerous, as this article explores.

PB-Jan2020-F2 Policy Beat
Despite Trump Invitation to Stop Taking Refugees, Red and Blue States Alike Endorse Resettlement
Forty-two governors, Republican and Democrat alike, have affirmed their consent for continued refugee resettlement, bypassing an invitation from the Trump administration to stop accepting refugees. These actions, which reportedly surprised the White House, suggest there may be limits to the Trump immigration agenda when it comes to refugees, as this Policy Beat explores.


Editor's Note

There has been a significant uptick in migration of Brazilians to the U.S.-Mexico border. Nearly 18,000 Brazilians were apprehended at the southwest border during fiscal year (FY) 2019, the highest such level since 2007 and a significant increase from just 1,500 apprehensions in FY 2018.

In response, the Trump administration has started sending some Brazilians to Mexico under the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP) program, more commonly known as Remain in Mexico. Since first implemented in January 2019, the program has required nearly 60,000 Central American and other asylum seekers to remain in Mexican border cities where they wait for the duration of their U.S. immigration proceedings, which can take months. Until now, most returned under MPP have been Spanish speakers, making the inclusion of Portuguese-speaking Brazilians a significant departure. "It's discouraging we are placing non-Spanish speakers in a legally, economically, and physically challenging environment without support mechanisms or effective guidance," one U.S. asylum officer said. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) officials suggest the move was a natural one, given increases in arrivals of asylum seekers and other migrants from beyond Mexico and Central America.

What’s driving the increased Brazilian arrivals? For many it’s the state of the Brazilian economy, which fell into a deep recession in 2015-16 and has emerged with only anemic growth and significant unemployment and underemployment (with nearly one in four workers underemployed). While the economy and employment have improved slightly, inflation and limited opportunities continue to incentivize Brazilians to seek work in the United States. In some small towns, smugglers sell migration packages to residents, sometimes even guaranteeing a job in the United States.

The state of the economy is not the only reason Brazilians are leaving. In Rio de Janeiro, police killings reached a record high in 2019, with violence against women and the LGBTQ population on the rise as well. Broader violence and corruption, including at the highest levels of government, also are significant causes. And ironically, some suggest stricter U.S. border policies could be part of the cause, as some fear the time is “now or never.” The Brazilian immigrant population in the United States, which now stands at about 472,000, has more than doubled since 2000.

There is some sense that the corner has been turned economically under new President Jair Bolsonaro. With Brazilians “often inspired by an optimistic view of their future in a great and prosperous nation,” it remains to be seen how migration flows to the United States will adapt given Brazil’s nascent economic recovery and political dysfunction.

Best regards,

Editor, Migration Information Source

[email protected]


If you no longer wish to receive this newsletter, you can unsubscribe.

The Migration Information Source is a project of the Migration Policy Institute, a nonpartisan, nonprofit think tank in Washington, DC dedicated to analysis of the movement of people worldwide.

Copyright @ 2019 Migration Policy Institute. All rights reserved.
MPI | 1400 16th St. NW, Suite 300 | Washington, DC 20036
ph: (001) 202-266-1940 | fax: (001) 202-266-1900
[email protected]