|
Illinois Settles Lawsuit, Agrees to Make Voter
Registration List Information Public
We continue our success in ensuring cleaner elections.
Judicial Watch settled a federal
election integrity lawsuit on behalf of the Illinois Conservative Union
against the state of Illinois, the Illinois State Board of Elections, and
its director. The settlement grants access to the current centralized
statewide list of registered voters in the state for the past 15
elections.
This is a victory for all legal voters in Illinois. Voters will now have
the transparency that federal law requires in order to ensure elections in
Illinois are more honest and cleaner. Clean voter rolls mean cleaner
elections.
State officials had refused to allow the nonprofit and three lawfully
registered Illinois voters to obtain a copy of the state’s voter
registration list, despite their lawful request for those records under
federal law.
The State Board allowed access to the records but made any meaningful
review impossible, requiring the plaintiffs to travel to Springfield,
Illinois during limited working hours and review Illinois’ millions of
voter records one at a time on a computer terminal, with no ability to sort
or organize records.
We filed the lawsuit in the United States District Court in the
Northern District of Illinois (Illinois
Conservative Union et al v. Illinois et al. (No.
1:20-cv-05542)).
The settlement was approved by U.S. District Judge Sara L. Ellis, and
states:
Pursuant to this Agreement, Defendants shall provide to Plaintiffs the
current centralized statewide list of registered voters for Illinois (the
“Illinois Voter Registration List”) in electronic format, with all
fields provided to political committees, including but not limited to
fields indicating the registrant’s full name … residential street
address … email address … telephone number, county and state voter
identification number, age of the registrant, and the registrant’s status
(active or inactive) and the most recent date the entry was changed, and
voting history for the last fifteen (15) elections.
The National
Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA) provides that states
“shall make available for public inspection and, where available,
photocopying at a reasonable cost, all records concerning the
implementation of programs and activities conducted for the purpose of
ensuring the accuracy and currency of official lists of eligible
voters.”
When members of the Illinois Conservative Union sought access to
Illinois’ voter list, however, they were told they must view the database
one record at a time, on a single computer screen, during “normal
business hours,” at the State Board of Elections office in Springfield,
Illinois, which is 200 miles from where they live. There are over 8 million
voter registrations in Illinois. Judicial Watch argued that Illinois’
arbitrary restrictions “make a mockery” of federal law, “as much as a
requirement that Plaintiffs wear blindfolds.”
In 2021, Judge Ellis ruled on a motion in the case
that, “Plaintiffs have plausibly alleged that” Illinois law
“conflicts with” and “and frustrates the NVRA’s purpose of
providing voter information to the public to help ensure the accuracy and
currency of voter registration rolls.” She also allowed a claim to
proceed under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, on
the ground that political committees in Illinois can access copies of the
voter registration database while ordinary citizens cannot. The claims were
made against Illinois’ chief state elections official, Bernadette
Matthews, the Acting Executive Director of the Illinois State Board of
Elections.
A forthcoming Judicial Watch study, based on recent census data and
information Illinois reported to the federal Election Assistance
Commission, reveals that 14% of Illinois’ counties have more registered
voters than citizens over 18, while Illinois as a whole has close to
800,000 inactive registrants.
As several federal courts have recognized, the public records provisions of
the National Voter Registration Act were intended to enhance the ability of
private groups to monitor whether states are removing ineligible voters
from their voter rolls. In April 2020, a federal court in Maryland noted that organizations “such as
Judicial Watch” have “the resources and expertise that few individuals
can marshal. By excluding these organizations from access to voter
registration lists,” the purpose of the federal law is undermined. That
court ordered Maryland to produce complete voter registration records
requested by Judicial Watch.
As you know, we are a national leader in voting integrity and voting
rights. As part of its work, Judicial Watch assembled a team of highly
experienced voting rights attorneys who stopped discriminatory elections in
Hawaii, and cleaned up voter rolls in California, Ohio, Indiana, and
Kentucky, among other
achievements.
Robert Popper, a Judicial Watch senior attorney, leads its election law
program. Popper was previously in the Voting Section of the Civil Rights
Division of the Justice Department, where he managed voting rights
investigations, litigations, consent decrees, and settlements in dozens of
states.
In April 2023, Pennsylvania settled with us and
admitted in court filings that it removed 178,258 ineligible registrations
in response to communications from Judicial Watch. The settlement commits
Pennsylvania and five of its counties to extensive public reporting of
statistics regarding their ongoing voter roll clean-up efforts for the next
five years.
In March 2023, Colorado agreed to settle our NVRA lawsuit alleging that
Colorado failed to remove ineligible voters from its rolls. The settlement
agreement requires Colorado to provide Judicial Watch with the most recent
voter roll data for each Colorado county each year for six years.
In February 2023, Los Angeles County confirmed the removal of 1,207,613 ineligible
voters from its rolls since last year, under the terms of a settlement
agreement in a federal lawsuit we filed in 2017.
We settled a federal election integrity
lawsuit against New York City after the city removed 441,083 ineligible
names from the voter rolls and promised to take reasonable steps going
forward to clean its voter registration lists.
Kentucky also removed hundreds of thousands of old
registrations after it entered into a consent decree to end another
Judicial Watch lawsuit.
In February 2022, we settled a voter roll clean-up lawsuit against
North Carolina and two of its counties after North Carolina removed
over 430,000 inactive registrations from its voter rolls.
In March 2022, a Maryland court ruled in
favor of our challenge to the Democratic state legislature’s
“extreme” congressional gerrymander.
In May 2022, we sued Illinois on behalf of Congressman Mike Bost
and two other registered Illinois voters to stop state election officials
from extending Election Day for 14 days beyond the date established by
federal law. This litigation is ongoing.
There is more work to be done and Judicial Watch will continue to do the
heavy lifting to help ensure our elections are fair and honest.
BREAKING: Judicial Watch Sues for Records on Secret Service Protection
for Unacknowledged Granddaughter of Joe Biden
The family of the president of the United States obviously has special
security needs, provided first and foremost by the Secret Service. So, when
a Biden family member evidently has no protection, it is an issue of public
concern. Judicial Watch filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit
against the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for all internal Secret
Service communications regarding the provision or potential provision of
Secret Service protection for Navy Joan Roberts, the 4-year-old daughter of
Hunter Biden and grandchild of President Joe Biden (Judicial Watch v. U.S.
Department of Homeland Security (No. 1:23-cv-02028)).
On its website, the Secret
Service states that, under Title 18 of the United States Code, Section
3056, the agency’s authority as provided by law guarantees protection for
the president and vice president and their immediate families.
However, on June 6, 2022, the Daily Mail reported that
President Biden refused to provide security for Navy Joan after her mother,
Lunden Roberts, reported to police that she had been threatened by her
ex-fiancé, cage fighter Princeton Foster.
We filed a FOIA request on May 2, 2023. On June 12, 2023, the Secret
Service issued a final response stating that no responsive records had been
located. We appealed, challenging the thoroughness of the search. We then
sued after the Secret Service failed to respond to the appeal for:
All reports, memoranda, and internal USSS electronic communications,
including emails and text messages, regarding the provision or potential
provision of USSS protection to Navy Joan Roberts, the daughter of Hunter
Biden and granddaughter of President Joe Biden.
Hunter Biden had denied paternity, but a DNA test in
2019 proved he is in fact the father of Navy Joan Roberts and he has
been providing significant court-ordered child support.
President Biden has never publicly acknowledged that Navy Joan Roberts is
his grandchild. The New York Times reported earlier
this month: “In strategy meetings in recent years, aides have been told
that the Bidens have six, not seven, grandchildren, according to two people
familiar with the discussions…the president has not yet met or publicly
mentioned his other grandchild. His White House has not answered questions
about whether he will publicly acknowledge her now that the child support
case is settled.”
All of Joe Biden’s grandchildren can receive Secret Service protection
while he’s in office. We frankly can’t imagine any good reason to deny
security to this child.
Millions More to Recruit Minorities for Jobless Benefits Amid Low
Unemployment
Bureaucracies never give up when it comes to spending your tax dollars. As
our Corruption Chronicles blog reports, President
Biden’s Labor Department is on another crusade to spend more tax
dollars:
U.S. unemployment is low and stable, yet the Biden administration keeps
giving states millions of dollars to boost the number of
minorities—especially non-English speaking or limited-English
proficient—that sign up for government jobless benefits. The goal is to
address racial disparities and promote “equitable access” to the
program. The money—an unprecedented $260
million—started flowing in early spring of 2022 to advance equity in
state unemployment insurance. COVID-19 inspired the controversial project,
according to the Department of Labor (DOL), the agency disbursing the
funds. “Throughout the pandemic, disparities in access to benefits
affected women, communities of color and other marginalized workers at a
higher rate and often delayed delivery of much needed financial support and
services,” the DOL announced last spring. “These disparities in access
to unemployment insurance exposed serious real-world shortcomings in the
outdated systems used to deliver state and territories unemployment
insurance benefits.”
Specifically, the Biden administration aims
to address disparities in the administration and delivery of unemployment
benefits by race, ethnicity, language proficiency and disability status. To
accomplish it, the DOL has directed states to use the taxpayer dollars to
“support innovative strategies and solutions to promote equitable
access” to unemployment compensation. “This includes funding that will
increase public awareness of the program so more people apply, improve
service delivery so claimants receive their first benefits in a timely
manner and develop a better understanding of the equity challenges that
need to be addressed,” the labor agency revealed last year. State
officials can also use a portion of their grant to evaluate the
effectiveness of programs they create with the federal funds. “To become
a more robust safety net and economic stabilizer, our unemployment
insurance system must serve all workers fairly and equitably,” Labor
Secretary Marty Walsh declared.
The initial allocation of $20 million was
split between three states—Oregon, Pennsylvania and Virginia—and the
District of Columbia. Since then, the DOL has approved equity grants for 41
states and jurisdictions, a recent agency filing reveals. The
document says that projects target a “wide range of underserved
populations,” but identifies the top three as non-English or
limited-English proficient, people with disabilities and low-income
claimants with economic hardships. “States are continuing to use a
diverse slate of strategies to promote equitable access to unemployment
compensation programs,” the DOL writes. “Improving services to
claimants and expanding access to services by improving technology or
implementing new technology are primary areas of focus for most projects,
with a core theme of resolving access barriers for underserved
populations.” Some states are creating “customer outreach plans” that
incorporate community-based groups representing the underserved
populations.
Even though unemployment remains low, a few
days ago the administration allocated an additional $9.5
million to sign up more minorities for unemployment benefits. The latest
equity grants will go to Arkansas, Louisiana and Vermont so officials can
implement projects that seek to remove barriers related to race, age,
ethnicity, language proficiency and other system issues that make it
difficult for people to access unemployment insurance benefits. Arkansas
will get the biggest chunk, $4,562,000, with Louisiana receiving $2,661,616
and Vermont $2,283,000 to expand outreach, promote awareness, provide
translation services and address disadvantaged communities’ other needs,
according to the DOL. Not that long ago, the administration bragged about the record low
unemployment rate among minorities, specifically black (5.4%) and Hispanic
(4.5%) populations.
The minority unemployment benefit drive is
part of a larger Biden administration effort to advance racial equity and
support for underserved communities through the federal government. The
costly initiative was launched back in January 2021 when the president
issued an executive order claiming
that “entrenched disparities” in laws, public policies, and private
institutions have denied equal opportunity to individuals and communities
and that the health and climate crises have exposed inequities while a
“historic movement for justice has highlighted the unbearable human costs
of systemic racism.” Following the order, Uncle Sam started cutting
checks for the initiative and assigning special equity chiefs and
commissions at agencies throughout the government.
Until next week,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Judicial Watch, Inc.
425 3rd St Sw Ste 800
Washington, DC 20024
|
|
202.646.5172 |
|
|
© 2017 - 2023, All Rights Reserved
Manage
Email Subscriptions |
Unsubscribe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|