This statute paves the way for the government to muzzle any nonviolent, political speech that challenges government injustice

View this email in your browser ([link removed])
[link removed]



** For Immediate Release: January 30, 2020
------------------------------------------------------------


** Law Criminalizing Speech That ‘Encourages’ Immigrants to Remain in the Country Is So Broad That It Could Be Used to Punish Anti-Government Speech
------------------------------------------------------------

WASHINGTON, DC —Denouncing government efforts to silence dissent and punish civil disobedience, The Rutherford Institute has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to strike down as unconstitutionally overbroad a federal statute making it a crime to “encourage” undocumented aliens to remain in the country ([link removed]) . For example, legal advice given by an immigration attorney or a plea from a grandmother to her grandson not to abandon her could be considered criminal activity under this law.

In an amicus curiae brief filed in United States v. Sineneng-Smith ([link removed]) in conjunction with the American Civil Liberties Union and the Service Employees International Union, Rutherford Institute attorneys argue that the federal law infringes on the First Amendment’s protection of freedom of speech and could eventually be used to punish anyone who urges resistance to government tyranny.

“This statute paves the way for the government to muzzle any nonviolent, political speech that challenges government injustice ([link removed]) ,” said constitutional attorney John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute and author of Battlefield America: The War on the American People ([link removed]) . “This is exactly the kind of law that would have rendered countless Americans as criminals, from Revolutionary War patriots to Martin Luther King Jr., for encouraging resistance and civil disobedience in the face of government tyranny.”
MAKE THE GOVERNMENT PLAY BY THE RULES OF THE CONSTITUTION: SUPPORT THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM ([link removed])

Evelyn Sineneng-Smith is an immigration consultant in California, helping individuals and employers navigate the nation’s complex immigration system so that noncitizens can become lawful and productive residents in the United States. In the course of assisting two undocumented workers and their employer with the process of obtaining a status that would allow the workers to remain and work in the U.S., Sineneng-Smith prepared and filed paperwork and applications that gave the workers a better chance of eventually obtaining permanent lawful residency status, although obtaining that status still depended on changes in the law extending the workers’ eligibility dates. The government eventually brought criminal charges against Sineneng-Smith for the help she provided, alleging that she had misled the workers to believe they would obtain permanent lawful residency status (although Sineneng-Smith asserted she warned the workers that changes to the law would still be required).

Sineneng-Smith was charged with violating an immigration statute making it a crime to “encourage” or “induce” an alien to reside in the U.S. in violation of the law. Sineneng-Smith argued not only that she had not misled the workers, but that the immigration statute’s ban on “encouraging” another to stay in the country in violation of the immigration laws violates the First Amendment’s protection of freedom of speech. At trial, her constitutional defense was denied and she was sentenced to 18 months imprisonment. However, a federal appeals court reversed the conviction, ruling that the prohibition on “encouraging” was overbroad and criminalized speech that is constitutionally protected. In challenging the government’s appeal to the Supreme Court, The Rutherford Institute and its partners filed an amicus brief ([link removed]) supporting Sineneng-Smith, arguing that the criminal prohibition on “encouraging” aliens t
o stay in the U.S. discriminates against speech on the basis of its viewpoint in violation of the First Amendment.

Affiliate attorneys Erin Glenn Busby, Lisa R. Eskow and Michael F. Sturley of the University of Texas School of Law Supreme Court Clinic assisted The Rutherford Institute and its coalition partners in advancing the arguments in the Sineneng-Smith amicus brief ([link removed]) .

Source: [link removed]

The Rutherford Institute, a nonprofit civil liberties organization, provides legal assistance at no charge to individuals whose constitutional rights have been threatened or violated.
[link removed] Share ([link removed])
[link removed] https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Frutherford%2Flaw-criminalizing-speech-that-encourages-immigrants-to-remain-in-the-country-is-so-broad-that-it-could-be-used-to-punish-anti-government-speech Tweet ([link removed] https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Frutherford%2Flaw-criminalizing-speech-that-encourages-immigrants-to-remain-in-the-country-is-so-broad-that-it-could-be-used-to-punish-anti-government-speech)
[link removed] Forward ([link removed])
CLICK HERE TO MAKE A TAX-DEDUCTIBLE DONATION ([link removed])

To donate via PayPal, please click below:
[link removed]

============================================================
** Follow us on Facebook ([link removed])
** Follow us on Facebook ([link removed])
** Follow us on Twitter ([link removed])
** Follow us on Twitter ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
CONTACT INFORMATION
Nisha Whitehead
(434) 978-3888 ext. 604
** [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])

THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE
Post Office Box 7482
Charlottesville, VA 22906-7482
Phone: (434) 978-3888
** www.rutherford.org ([link removed])

Copyright © 2020 The Rutherford Institute, All rights reserved.

You are receiving this email because of your interest in the work of The Rutherford Institute. Founded in 1982 by constitutional attorney and author John W. Whitehead, The Rutherford Institute is a civil liberties organization that provides free legal services to people whose constitutional and human rights have been threatened or violated. To discontinue your membership electronically, or if you feel you are receiving this message in error, please follow the link below.

Under the regulations of the United States Internal Revenue Service, The Rutherford Institute is incorporated as a 501(c)(3) tax exempt nonprofit organization. Donations to support The Rutherford Institute’s legal and educational work help to safeguard the constitutional rights of all Americans. Donations are tax-deductible. In compliance with general industry standards of a nonprofit organization, the Institute is audited annually by an independent accounting firm.

** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])

** update subscription preferences ([link removed])