View this post on the web at [link removed]
We owe The Daily Skeptic [ [link removed] ] a standing ovation for obtaining a copy of an important pre-print study [ [link removed] ] from the depths of the internet archive that would otherwise have been suppressed by the powers at large manipulating modern-day “science.”
This wasn’t just any study. This systemic review in the Lancet investigated the causal links between COVID-19 vaccination and death using autopsies and post-mortem analysis—yet another thing U.S. regulatory agencies have failed to do.
Do you know what these prestigious researchers found? COVID-19 vaccines are killing people.
Physicians and scientists searched all published autopsy and necropsy reports related to COVID-19 vaccination through May 18, 2023, resulting in 678 studies. After implementing certain criteria, they chose 44 papers containing 325 autopsy cases and one necropsy case.
Three physicians (with actual medical degrees and expertise) independently reviewed all deaths to determine whether COVID-19 vaccination was the direct cause or a significant factor in causing the death.
Of 325 autopsies reviewed, 240 deaths (73.9%) were independently adjudicated as “directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination.”
Findings showed the most affected organ system in COVID-19 vaccine-associated death was the cardiovascular system (53%), followed by the hematological system (17%), the respiratory system (8%), and multiple organ systems (7%). Three or more organ systems were affected in 21 cases.
The mean time from vaccination to death was 14.3 days—with most deaths occurring within a week of the last vaccine dose. For those who may think this doesn’t show a “causal connection” between vaccine administration and death, you would be wise to reassess that position.
The authors concluded:
“The consistency seen among cases in this review with known COVID-19 vaccine adverse events, their mechanisms, and related excess death, coupled with autopsy confirmation and physician-led death adjudication, suggests there is a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccines and death in most cases. Further urgent investigation is required for the purpose of clarifying our findings.”
The study was removed by the Lancet within 24 hours and replaced with this notice:
“This preprint has been removed by Preprints with the Lancet because the study’s conclusions are not supported by the study methodology.”
No further explanation was given.
One can only assume the paper was removed because prestigious author Dr. Harvey Rische, professor emeritus and senior research scientist in epidemiology at Yale (who also happens to know a few things about biostatistics and public health), has no clue how to interpret data.
His co-authors, including Dr. Peter McCullough and Dr. Paul Alexander, are equally inept.
Here’s one other important fact you should know: Unlike every other study used to support the tell-tale narrative that COVID-19 vaccines are perfectly safe, the authors of this paper received no funding for the time, effort, and work it took to do this analysis.
Having written thousands of articles on COVID-19 vaccines and having conducted numerous interviews with family members of loved ones who have died as a direct result of the shot, I can tell you U.S. regulatory agencies are ignoring the deaths caused by the shots.
In fact, if a pathologist or medical examiner determines the COVID-19 vaccine was a cause of death or contributing factor in an autopsy report, and that report is submitted to the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), the NIAID will use its own experts to “review” the autopsy report to exclude the vaccine as a cause or contributing factor of death. (The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is an even bigger hot mess.)
Not only do I have internal email exchanges from the NIAID documenting their efforts to exclude severe adverse events, but I also have death reports and autopsies provided to me by individuals that were submitted to the NIAID and subsequent email exchanges whereby they tried to use their own “experts” to refute death certificates and autopsy reports in individuals who clearly died from COVID-19 vaccines.
The Lancet pre-print study ultimately tells you two things:
First, question the science. To have an accurate picture of the latest science, you need to be able to review all of the data, not just what “medical journals” (can we even call them that at this point?) and pseudo-experts publish.
Second, you should assume that what you’ve been told about COVID-19 and vaccines by the agencies designed to regulate these products is a lie.
If you don’t believe me, catch up on the Missouri v. Biden [ [link removed] ] case, where a judge this week accused U.S. government agencies under the guise of the Biden administration of engaging in Orwellian censorship efforts to manipulate us with their chosen narratives on various issues, including COVID-19 and vaccines—and to stop this “almost dystopian scenario” of “us[ing] its power to silence the opposition.”
We would be naive to think their reach is limited to social media companies.
Here’s an internet archive [ [link removed] ] of the study.
Here’s a pdf copy [ [link removed] ] of the study.
You have the right to see all research and form your own conclusions, especially when it comes to forced medical experimentation that carries a risk of death.
Megan Redshaw is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Unsubscribe [link removed]?
