All freedoms hang together.

View this email in your browser ([link removed])
[link removed]



** For Immediate Release: June 30, 2023
------------------------------------------------------------


** Supreme Court Provides Greater Protections for Religious Workers, Sides With Postal Worker Requesting Sundays Off
------------------------------------------------------------

WASHINGTON, D.C. —The U.S. Supreme Court has affirmed that government employees should not have to choose between their right of conscience and the threat of losing their livelihood ([link removed]) when reasonable accommodations for their religious observances can be found.

In a unanimous ruling ([link removed]) in Groff v. DeJoy, the Supreme Court held that an employee—in this case, a postal worker requesting Sundays off for religious worship—is entitled to a religious accommodation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act unless it would result in substantial increased costs to the employer’s business. In an amicus brief ([link removed]) filed in Groff, The Rutherford Institute joined with a legal coalition to argue that the government should be held to a higher standard when claiming an “undue hardship” in order to deny religious accommodation requests.

“The religious rights of government employees should not be treated as negligible concerns,” said constitutional attorney John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute and author of Battlefield America: The War on the American People ([link removed]) .
$100,000 FIRST AMENDMENT CHALLENGE DEADLINE: JUNE 30 DEADLINE. DONATE TODAY. ([link removed])

Gerald Groff started working for the United States Postal Service (“USPS”) in 2012 as a Rural Carrier Associate assisting regular carriers in the delivery of mail. The following year, USPS contracted with Amazon to deliver packages on Sundays. In keeping with his religious beliefs about worshiping on Sundays, Groff transferred to work at a smaller post office which did not deliver Amazon packages on Sundays. However, in March 2017, that post office began Sunday deliveries for Amazon as well. Rather than using or employing part-time employees who specifically work on Sundays and holidays to resolve scheduling difficulties caused by the low number of staff, Groff’s post office instead proposed that Groff accommodate the USPS by picking a different day of the week to worship and observe the Sabbath. However, Groff was firm in his religious convictions about worshiping on Sundays. And because Groff would not work when scheduled on Sundays, he faced progressive discipline. Denied any
accommodation for his religious objections to working on Sundays, Groff resigned in January 2019 and then sued USPS for religious discrimination.

Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, employers must provide a reasonable accommodation for a worker’s religious observance and practice unless doing so would create an “undue hardship” on the conduct of the employer’s business. The Supreme Court seemed to indicate in 1977 that requiring an employer to bear anything more than a minimal cost in providing a religious accommodation constituted an undue hardship, which was a low standard employers could easily meet. Weighing in before the Court in Groff v. DeJoy, a legal coalition made up of The Rutherford Institute and a number of other civil liberties advocacy groups argued ([link removed]) that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act should be interpreted to prohibit the government from treating religious rights as a trifling concern to be easily discarded when it suits the government’s agenda. With this ruling in Groff
([link removed]) , the Court clarified that an “undue hardship” on an employer means more than something just slightly beyond a minimal or trivial cost, which was an incorrect interpretation used by many employers and lower courts for the past 45 years to justify refusing employees’ religious accommodation requests.

Affiliate attorney Christopher F. Moriarty, Thomas C. Berg with the University of St. Thomas School of Law, and Laura Nammo and Kimberlee Wood Colby with the Christian Legal Society advanced the arguments in the Groff v. DeJoy amicus briefs ([link removed]) .

The Rutherford Institute ([link removed]) , a nonprofit civil liberties organization, provides legal assistance at no charge to individuals whose constitutional rights have been threatened or violated and educates the public on a wide spectrum of issues affecting their freedoms.

This press release is also available at www.rutherford.org ([link removed]) .

Source: [link removed]
[link removed] Share ([link removed])
[link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Frutherford%2Fus-supreme-court-sides-with-postal-worker-requesting-sundays-off Tweet ([link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Frutherford%2Fus-supreme-court-sides-with-postal-worker-requesting-sundays-off)
[link removed] Forward ([link removed])
MAKE THE GOVERNMENT PLAY BY THE RULES OF THE CONSTITUTION: SUPPORT THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM ([link removed])

To donate via PayPal, please click below:
[link removed]

============================================================
** Follow us on Facebook ([link removed])
** Follow us on Facebook ([link removed])
** Follow us on Twitter ([link removed])
** Follow us on Twitter ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
CONTACT INFORMATION
Nisha Whitehead
(434) 978-3888 ext. 604
** [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])

THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE
Post Office Box 7482
Charlottesville, VA 22906-7482
Phone: (434) 978-3888
** www.rutherford.org ([link removed])

Copyright © 2023 The Rutherford Institute, All rights reserved.

You are receiving this email because of your interest in the work of The Rutherford Institute. Founded in 1982 by constitutional attorney and author John W. Whitehead, The Rutherford Institute is a civil liberties organization that provides free legal services to people whose constitutional and human rights have been threatened or violated. To discontinue your membership electronically, or if you feel you are receiving this message in error, please follow the link below.

Under the regulations of the United States Internal Revenue Service, The Rutherford Institute is incorporated as a 501(c)(3) tax exempt nonprofit organization. Donations to support The Rutherford Institute’s legal and educational work help to safeguard the constitutional rights of all Americans. Donations are tax-deductible. In compliance with general industry standards of a nonprofit organization, the Institute is audited annually by an independent accounting firm.

** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])

** update subscription preferences ([link removed])