The women who left Germany to join ISIS and returned are standing trial. This
CEP blog series follows the trials of some of these female returnees. The
discussions on Monika K., Nadine K., and Marcia M. can be found here, here, and
here. An overview of the state of prosecutions in Germany can be found here
(available in English and German) and recent developments in repatriation here.





<[link removed]>
<[link removed]>
<[link removed]>
<[link removed]>



ISIS Women In Court: Nadine K. – Time To Reflect?



Read ISIS Women in Court: Nadine K. – Time To Reflect? by clicking here
<[link removed]>.



ISIS Women in Court: Nadine K. – Time To Reflect?

By Sofia Koller, Senior Research Analyst, CEP



The women who left Germany to join ISIS and returned are standing trial. This
CEP blog series follows the trials of some of these female returnees. The
discussions on Monika K., Nadine K., and Marcia M. can be foundhere
<[link removed]>
,here
<[link removed]>
,and here
<[link removed]>.
An overview of the state of prosecutions in Germany can be foundhere
<[link removed]>
(available in English and German) and recent developments in repatriationhere
<[link removed]>
.



On a hot summer day in June 2023, the court room at the Higher Regional Court
in Koblenz is packed. National and international journalists, observers from
Yazidi organizations, discreet police officers, and the defendant’s family and
friends have all come to hear the verdict against female returnee Nadine K. All
participants and observers stand as the presiding judge Martina Kohlmeyer reads
aloud theverdict
<[link removed]>
after 30 days of trial: nine years and three months in prison for, inter alia,
membership in a foreign terrorist organization, violation of the war weapons
control act, crimes against humanity by enslavement, deprivation of liberty,
and persecution, as well as aiding and abetting genocide. If confirmed upon
appeal, this would be the second longest prison sentence for a female returnee
in Germany to date. But there are several other aspects that make the case of
Nadine K. especially interesting and are worth highlighting.



Having brought an extensive list of charges
<[link removed]>
against Nadine K., the Federal prosecutors saw most of their accusations and
the evidence they presented during the trial confirmed by the court’s verdict.
The court largely followed the prosecutors’ argument. According to their
statement, Nadine K. had followed Ibrahim O., whom she had married according to
Islamic law back to his home country Syria in December 2014, where the couple
joined ISIS. While Ibrahim O. worked as a doctor, Nadine K. stayed at home to
take care of the household and their two daughters. In April 2016 in Mosul,
Ibrahim O. brought home an enslaved Yazidi woman, Naveen Al K. For three years,
Naveen Al K. had to cook, clean, and take care of the couple’s children and
animals. Nadine K. hence exploited Naveen Al K.’s situation for her own
benefit. Ibrahim O. also raped the then 21-year-old regularly, a fact that,
according to the court, Nadine K. did know about and enabled since she made
sure that Naveen Al K. could not flee.



The crimes committed against Naveen Al K. were clearly the trial’s centerpiece
<[link removed]>
. In July 2022, the abuse and exploitation of an enslaved Yazidi woman by a
female ISIS member has beenrecognized
<[link removed].>
by a German court in Hamburg as aiding and abetting genocide, an international
crime, for the first time. In Koblenz, the presiding judge highlighted Naveen
Al K.’s personal strength, as she agreed to travel from Iraq to testify in a
foreign country, not knowing Germany’s culture, language, or legal system, but
trusting in the rule of law in Germany.



A Women’s Guest House



The court found Nadine K. also guilty of having hosted, together with her
husband, several German ISIS women in their house in Mosul. Interestingly, the
judges argued that it was “irrelevant” whether Nadine K.’s house was an
official ISIS women’s guest house, a so-called madafa. The couple’s villa
fulfilled the same function: hosting single ISIS women who were not allowed to
live alone either because they were divorced or because their husbands were on
a training or combat mission, had been detained, or died.



A Quagmire of Evidence



Finally, Nadine K. was acquitted of charges regarding a war crime against
property. The court argued that while all available information suggested that
the couple had indeed “looted” their villa in Mosul from the original owners,
there was not enough evidence to prove it. The defense had stressed this lack
of evidence during their final statement. The court’s acknowledgment that they
“do not know” is a positive sign. In several other cases, female returnees had
beenconvicted
<[link removed]>
for war crimes against property. The defense lawyers had argued that an
accusation of such a serious crime supported by such little evidence would
never have led to a conviction if this act was committed in Germany and not
Syria or Iraq.



Indeed, evidence is one of the most challenging
<[link removed]>
aspects of prosecuting returnees in their country of origin. Similar to
several other cases, the testimonies of the Yazidi witness and co-plaintiff
Naveen Al K. were crucial for the construction of charges and conviction of
Nadine K. However, access to more objective evidence in returnee cases remains
extremely difficult, for example proof of rent payments or actual involvement
in combat beyond training. For the defense, accessing evidence that might
exonerate the defendant is even more difficult. Nadine K.’s lawyers had
requested to hear several (former) ISIS women as witnesses, which presented a
separate set of challenges. For instance, one Finnish woman could not be forced
to come testify in a German court and another German woman could not be located.



Missing Perpetrators



What exactly happened in Syria and Iraq remains elusive. What is also missing
are some of the key perpetrators of ISIS crimes: its male members. The husbands
of female returnees like Nadine K., Sara O., or Jalda A. remain the obvious
blanks in these trials. Investigations are ongoing, but no German man has stood
trial for crimes against Yazidis yet. This lack of prosecution and
accountability is partly the consequence of apolicy of inaction
<[link removed]>
towards male foreign terrorist fighters detained in Northeast Syria for more
than four years. The Kurdish administration recentlyannounced
<[link removed]>
its intent to prosecute foreigners themselves, but this is likely a move to
put pressure on foreign governments to finally repatriate their nationals.



Living in a Bubble



In its statement, the court recognized Nadine K. as an “intelligent and
self-confident woman,” whose previous life in Germany and behavior in court did
not match the defendant’s “claim to naivety.” Nadine K. had surprised Ibrahim
O. with her conversion the day of their Islamic marriage and had traveled to
Syria after the genocide against the Yazidis, events that were notable in
German and Western news. Indeed, female returnees often claim they did not know
about ISIS crimes or their extent. But no matter how much these women knew or
were able to control their individual lives, cases like Nadine K.’s demonstrate
how adaptative and opportunistic many were.



The verdict is not yet legally binding, and the defense will likely appeal the
verdict. Once the sentence is final, Nadine K. is hopefully able to use the
time spent in prison to reflect on her decision-making as well as the
deplorable consequences of her actions for herself and others. If she
undertakes such critical reflection, this will be an important first step to
reconstruct her life after release—potentially together with her children.





###







Unsubscribe
<[link removed]>
|Donate <[link removed]> | Contact Us
<[link removed]>


Were you forwarded this email? Subscribe for yourself here
<[link removed]>
.