The fight to save Rodney is not over, and we won’t give up.
 ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌   ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ 

John,

Today, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA) denied Rodney Reed’s motion for habeas relief and a new trial, rejecting overwhelming evidence supporting his innocence and demonstrating prosecutorial misconduct. While we are devastated by this ruling, we know the fight to save Rodney is not over — and we won’t give up.

In a statement after the ruling came down, Innocence Project Senior Staff Attorney Jane Pucher, who is one of Rodney’s attorneys, said, “In 2019, when the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals stayed Rodney Reed’s execution to allow the courts to consider his Brady, false testimony, and actual innocence claims, the CCA entrusted Judge Langley with making impartial findings and independent assessments of witnesses’ credibility, supported by the evidence. That did not happen. It is not plausible that Judge Langley could find every witness for the State to be credible and every witness called by Mr. Reed to be not credible.”

Please take a moment to read about the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals’ decision, and then share the news on social media to help build support for Rodney.

Share on Twitter

Share on Facebook

Share on Instagram

Share on LinkedIn

For more than two decades, Rodney has been on death row in Texas despite mounting evidence pointing to his innocence. Rodney, a Black man, was convicted by an all-white jury of the 1996 murder of a white woman named Stacey Stites. At the time, Stacey was having a consensual relationship with Rodney, while she was engaged to a police officer named Jimmy Fennell. But the prosecution told the jury that they had searched everywhere and no one ever said Rodney and Stacey knew each other.

But it was recently discovered that the prosecutors did have information that Rodney and Stacey knew each other, and at the 1998 trial, they illegally concealed statements made by Stacey’s co-workers that showed she and Rodney were romantically involved.

The State also illegally concealed statements from Stacey’s neighbors about loud, violent arguments between Stacey and her fiancé, who was the prime suspect in her murder for nearly a year.

At the recent evidentiary hearing, Rodney presented new, overwhelming evidence of his innocence — but the Texas CCA shut him down.

“Texans should be outraged that prosecutorial misconduct is going unchecked and the State is being given a license to cheat — even if it means sending an innocent man to his death,” Jane Pucher said. “Mr. Reed’s conviction and death sentence violates the most central tenets of our Constitution and cannot stand. We will continue to fight for Mr. Reed’s freedom and bring him home to his family.” 

Read more about what happened in Rodney’s case today and what’s next in his fight for freedom and justice.

Thank you for your support,

— The Innocence Project Team


 
 
 
Shop
 
 
 
 
 
 
Donate
 
 
 
The Innocence Project works to free the innocent, prevent wrongful convictions, and create fair, compassionate, and equitable systems of justice for everyone. Founded in 1992 by Barry C. Scheck and Peter J. Neufeld at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law at Yeshiva University, the organization is now an independent nonprofit. Our work is guided by science and grounded in anti-racism.
www.innocenceproject.org

Copyright © 2023 Innocence Project, All rights reserved.
212.364.5340
[email protected]
unsubscribe from all emails   update subscription preferences