From Health Affairs Today <[email protected]>
Subject Tracking Value-Based Purchasing’s Progress
Date June 26, 2023 8:00 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Save $40 on a new Health Affairs Insider membership
 ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌


 

View Message in Browser
<[link removed]>


[link removed]

 

[link removed]

 

[link removed]

 

[link removed]

 

[link removed]

Monday, June 26, 2023 | The Latest Research, Commentary, And News From
Health Affairs

 

Today's newsletter highlights an analysis from Abhinav Pandey and
colleagues on twenty-four value-based purchasing programs.

 

Value-Based Purchasing Review

In their article in the June issue of Health Affairs, Abhinav Pandey and
his team of coauthors offer a systematic review, with qualitative
analysis, of value-based purchasing (VBP) programs across the country
<[link removed]>.


For the twenty-four programs evaluated by previously published
literature, all incentivizing spending reduction and quality
improvement, the authors find that "higher-intensity VBP programs are
more frequently associated with desired quality processes, utilization
measures, and spending reductions than lower-intensity programs."
Lower-intensity programs tended to be associated with null findings.

Pandey and coauthors also find that nonfinancial supports were present
in all but one of the evaluated programs, suggesting that VBP program
designers prioritize nonfinancial supports.

They also link VBP to desired outcomes for both quality improvements and
spending reduction, but not with spending reduction alone.

Read the Article
<[link removed]>


 

[link removed]


Advertisement

 

Elsewhere at Health Affairs

Today in Health Affairs Forefront, William Shrank and colleagues argue
that the behavioral health EMR gap must be closed
<[link removed]>.


And Paul Fronstin and coauthors write about the cost implications of the
<[link removed]>Braidwood
<[link removed]>ruling
for enrollees and plan sponsors
<[link removed]>.

 

[link removed]


 

Daily Digest

Close The Behavioral Health EMR Gap
<[link removed]>William
Shrank et al.

The Cost Implications Of The

**Braidwood** Ruling For Enrollees And Plan Sponsors
<[link removed]>

Paul Fronstin et al.

Value-Based Purchasing Design And Effect: A Systematic Review And
Analysis
<[link removed]>

Abhinav Pandey et al.

 

[link removed]


 

About Health Affairs

Health Affairs is the leading peer-reviewed journal
<[link removed]> at the intersection of health,
health care, and policy. Published monthly by Project HOPE, the journal
is available in print and online. Late-breaking content is also found
through healthaffairs.org <[link removed]>, Health
Affairs Today <[link removed]>, and Health
Affairs Sunday Update <[link removed]>.  

Project HOPE <[link removed]> is a global health and
humanitarian relief organization that places power in the hands of local
health care workers to save lives across the globe. Project HOPE has
published Health Affairs since 1981.

Copyright © Project HOPE: The People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc.

Health Affairs, 1220 19th Street, NW, Suite 800, Washington, DC 20036, United States

Privacy Policy <[link removed]>

To unsubscribe from this email, update your email preferences here
<[link removed]>.
_________________

Sent to [email protected]

Unsubscribe:
[link removed]

Health Affairs, 1220 19th Street, NW, Suite 800, Washington, DC 20036, United States
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis