In the wake of the Special Council which will take place on
February 20th, where European leaders will discuss with Council
president Charles Michel on the topic of the multi-annual financial
framework (MFF), this week’s headlines take a look at some of the
opinions surrounding the EU Budget.
|
 |
Budget cut implications
|
It is still uncertain as to what the final number of the 2021-2027
EU budget will be, as points out El País. The figures
proposed between the European Commission and the Parliament do not
align – there is yet to be a final agreement between the institutions
on how the EU will fill the gap left by Brexit. Nevertheless, as
El País reports, there will have to be budget cuts made in
other ways to fill the void, such as to the agricultural or structural
sectors. The article reports that the upcoming proposed budget may end
up being one of the smallest since the 1980s. This is in line with a
steady decline of the gross national income, the phenomenon of which
jeopardize the countries that receive significant funds from the EU,
such as Spain. It is clear that there is no clear agreement between
the EU member states – the percentage figure of the gross national
income of the EU has yet to be determined, proposals ranging between
the 1% and 1.30% mark.
|
|
 |
Austria's potential veto
|
Following the recent exit of the United Kingdom from the European
Union (who was one of the biggest contributors to the EU budget),
other countries are concerned about having to pay for the ‘Brexit
gap’, such as Austria. Following Chancellor Sebastian Kurz’s recent
threat of vetoing the MFF at the next European Council, Austrian news
agency Kurier discloses the more recent updates concerning
the nation’s position on the matter. EU Minister for Austria Karoline
Edtstadler has recently been making stops throughout the Visegrad
countries in order to speak to officials on the Austrian stance -
Along with the Netherlands, Sweden, and Denmark, Austria is one of the
net contributors to the EU Budget. Certain Visegrad countries are on
the opposite end of the spectrum, (considered net recipients of the EU
budget) hence the visits to the countries. Echoing Chancellor Kurz’s
thoughts, Kurier reports that Edtstadler calls for limiting
Austrian’s contribution to the EU budget, to one percent of the gross
national product. She also maintains that it would be unacceptable if
Austria loses the economic discounts it currently benefits from.
|
|
 |
Rule of law is essential
|
Charles Michel had a busy first week of February, meeting with
several EU leaders in Brussels ahead of the next European Council.
Romanian president Klaus Iohannis met with the Council president, as
reported by Romanian Insider. The European Budget was one of
the main points of the agenda, but more specifically for Romania were
the ties to the rule of law. The proposed criteria is that, as long as
the nation respects the rule of law, the granting of EU funding
continues – Iohannis specified to the press that Romania is in
agreement with this procedure. The Romanian president is aware of the
complicated conditionalities that come with being a ‘net receiver’
state but vowed that he would do his best to negotiate in Romania’s
favour. Romania Insider also reports that Iohannis was
hopeful for cohesion and agriculture to be on the agenda.
|
|
 |
Time is of the essence
|
Croatian Prime Minister Andrej Plenković has made clear his stance
on the MFF – the EU must come to an agreement sooner, rather than
later, reports Total Croatia News. Last week, the Croatian PM
attended a meeting in Portugal with the Friends of Cohesion informal
group, where he made the comments – Plenković firmly stated that the
legislative work surrounding the next European Budget needs to begin
as soon as possible. The article implies that the Croatian Prime
Minister does not seem too worried about the draft proposal, which
will be unveiled at the next European Council meeting. Total
Croatia News mentions that, with Croatia being in the seat of the
rotating Council presidency, the nation has a better chance of
defending its own national interests – especially in terms of cohesion
policy. After all, Croatia is the youngest member of the EU, having
only joined in 2013.
|
|
|
|