[link removed]

FAIR
View article on FAIR's website ([link removed])
WSJ Attacks Antitrust Champion Lina Khan Every 11 Days Since FTC Appointment Bryce Greene ([link removed])


WSJ: The Many Abuses of Lina Khan’s FTC

Among Khan's "many abuses" (Wall Street Journal, 2/14/23 ([link removed]) ): She hasn't recused herself from decisions involving Facebook even though she has expressed the opinion that Facebook is too big.

One important way to get a finger on the pulse of the US power elite is to pay attention to the business press. The Wall Street Journal, the US's top-circulation ([link removed]) newspaper, is well-known as the voice of the financial establishment. In the Biden years, one of its ongoing obsessions is publishing screeds against Lina Khan, chair of the president's Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

The American Economic Liberties Project is currently tracking Journal articles that mention the FTC chair with a new tool called the “Wall Street Grumble ([link removed]) .” These range from full-length attacks on Khan to sentence-long side-swipes. By AELP’s count, the Journal has published an attack on Lina Khan once every 11 days. As AELP notes:

The Journal also regularly publishes pieces that insert Chair Khan into seemingly unrelated or tangential issues, including blaming her for last year’s baby formula crisis, urging the Congressional China Select Committee to investigate her efforts to hold Big Tech monopolies accountable, and suggesting that she supports the World Economic Forum’s “No Grow” proponents.

For example, after the FTC decided to block ([link removed]) the merger between medical distributor company Illumina and medical testing company Grail, a Journal op-ed declared (4/27/23 ([link removed]) ): “Lina Khan Blocks Cancer Cures.” Grail does not in fact cure cancer ([link removed]) , nor would blocking the merger bar its technology from the market. The FTC challenged it on the grounds that since Grail’s technology requires Illumina’s systems to function, the merger could prevent similar technologies under development from competing.

Here is a small sample of other sensational headlines from the Journal:
* "The FTC’s Antitrust Collusion" (2/23/23 ([link removed]) )
* "Lina Khan’s Non-Compete Favor to Big Labor" (1/8/23 ([link removed])
* "The Many Abuses of Lina Khan’s FTC" (2/14/23 ([link removed]) )
* "Lina Kahn Is Icarus at the FTC" (7/13/21 ([link removed]) )
* "Lina Khan’s Power Grab at the FTC" (7/5/21 ([link removed]) )
* "‘Hipster’ Antitrust Goes Beltway at the FTC" (1/17/23 ([link removed]) )


** ‘Khan is effective’
------------------------------------------------------------
WSJ: Lina Khan’s Power Grab at the FTC

By "power grab," the Journal (7/5/21 ([link removed]) ) means that Khan recognizes that competition is about more than just price—even if Republicans don't.

David Dayen is the editor of the American Prospect, one of the few DC-focused magazines that regularly covers the obscure regulatory fights that shape corporate America. He told FAIR that he hasn't seen a regulatory official endure this level of right-wing backlash in 50 years. The last time, he said, the target was Michael Pertschuk ([link removed]) , the FTC chair under Jimmy Carter. As with Khan, Pertschuk effectively wielded the tools of government against corporate power. Dayen says the coincidence “says something about how the business community fears a muscular presence at that agency.”

Khan provoked discussion as a law student with her famous law review note, “The Amazon Antitrust Paradox” (Yale Law Journal, 1/17 ([link removed]) ), which outlined how lax enforcement of antitrust laws allowed behemoths like Amazon to dominate the economy and stifle competition. While size and market power were the original markers of a monopoly, Khan argued, since the 1980s, the standard for anti-competitive behavior has focused on “consumer welfare.” This has been narrowly interpreted ([link removed]) to mean lower prices for consumers, while the competitiveness of the market, quality of products, effects on choice and other important impacts on the consumer experience are omitted from analysis.

While the antitrust critics often fail on these grounds as well (firms without a competitor usually ([link removed]) increase prices over the long term—as, indeed, Amazon has ([link removed]) , as it's consolidated market share), this reinterpretation has allowed courts to ignore obvious anti-competitive mergers, and has allowed our economy to consolidate into a few big players.

Khan’s return to tradition marked a paradigm shift in antitrust discourse. She continued to make waves when Biden appointed her to chair the Federal Trade Commission, one of the most important bodies for antitrust enforcement. Kahn’s more aggressive stance against big business has elicited retaliation, in the form of a public campaign against her in the biggest US paper. “I think the crusade indicates that Lina Khan is effective, and corporate America doesn't want that effectiveness to spread,” said Dayen.


** Antitrust vs. democracy
------------------------------------------------------------

While it doesn’t often grab headlines, corporate consolidation looms large over many problems facing Americans today. As Dayen wrote in his 2020 book Monopolized: Life in the Age of Corporate Power:
WSJ: Lina Khan Is Icarus at the FTC

The Wall Street Journal (7/13/21 ([link removed]) ) is Ahab in the editorial office.

There are four major airlines, four major commercial banks, four major companies that deliver phone, wireless, cable and internet services. One company controls most web search; one company controls most social media; one company controls about half of all e-commerce. Handfuls of firms dominate virtually every aspect of food and agricultural production, media, military equipment, medical supply and regional hospital management.

When enormous chunks of every industry are controlled by a small number of firms who increasingly dominate the government and its policy, these companies and their shareholders are effectively an unaccountable oligarchy ([link removed]) .

While the Biden era is full of gloomy headlines ([link removed]) about the state of the country ([link removed]) , the world of antitrust is one of the few areas ([link removed]) of the government where serious positive developments are being reported. After lobbying from progressive groups, the administration began making appointments that signaled a serious intention to revive the government's antitrust activity. His first summer in office, Biden signed a sweeping executive order ([link removed]) designed by anti-monopoly professor Tim Wu ([link removed]) . The order outlined 72 different actions
([link removed]) that would reorient stagnant regulatory bodies to promote competition.

In addition to Khan and Wu (who has since left government), Biden hired antitrust lawyers like Jonathan Kanter ([link removed]) who are considered part of the “New Brandeisian ([link removed]) ” movement—named for Progressive Era anti-monopoly Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis.

Khan’s FTC is taking on major issues like anti-worker noncompete agreements ([link removed]) , personal data collection ([link removed]) and commercial surveillance ([link removed]) . With Kanter at the DoJ, the government has successfully blocked ([link removed]) the merger between publishing giants Penguin Random House and Simon & Schuster. In the background, lawsuits against Big Tech companies ([link removed]) are making their way through state and federal courts across the country, some aimed at reversing some of the enormous number of Silicon Valley mergers
([link removed]) and breaking up monopolistic online platforms ([link removed]) .

Dayen suggests that effects of the New Brandeisians may be rubbing off on other departments, citing the recent hiring ([link removed]) of Jen Howard at the Department of Transportation. Even a modest increase of antitrust activity causes massive ripples through corporate America, as the threat of enforcement deters anti-competitive activity.

The attacks from the business press demonstrate that corporate America is used to having a government that refuses to govern. As Dayen says, the shift “scares the living daylights out of the interests represented at the Wall Street Journal editorial page. The fear is palpable with each hastily written op-ed.”
------------------------------------------------------------

ACTION ALERT: You can send a message to the Wall Street Journal at [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) (or via Twitter: @WSJ ([link removed]) ) Please remember that respectful communication is the most effective. Feel free to leave a copy of your communication in the comments thread.
------------------------------------------------------------

FEATURED IMAGE: American Economic Liberties Project
Read more ([link removed])

Share this post: <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Twitter"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Twitter" alt="Twitter" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Facebook"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Facebook" alt="Facebook" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Pinterest"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Pinterest" alt="Pinterest" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="LinkedIn"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="LinkedIn" alt="LinkedIn" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Google Plus"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Google Plus" alt="Google Plus" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Instapaper"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Instapaper" alt="Instapaper" class="mc-share"></a>
​

© 2021 Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting. All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you signed up for email alerts from
Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting

Our mailing address is:
FAIRNESS & ACCURACY IN REPORTING
124 W. 30th Street, Suite 201
New York, NY 10001

FAIR's Website ([link removed])

FAIR counts on your support to do this work — please donate today ([link removed]) .

Follow us on Twitter ([link removed]) | Friend us on Facebook ([link removed])

change your preferences ([link removed])
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]
unsubscribe ([link removed]) .