** Maine becomes third state this year to pass legislation prohibiting utilities from charging ratepayers for political activities ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
By Charlie Spatz on Jun 21, 2023 08:40 am
The Maine legislature passed a bill this week prohibiting investor-owned utilities from charging customers for lobbying, trade association and chambers of commerce dues, charitable contributions, and public relations expenses. The bill also includes a provision to prohibit utilities from recovering contributions or gifts to political candidates, political parties, political or legislative committees, or any committee or organization working to influence referendum petitions or elections.
The bill, LD 325 ([link removed]) , sponsored by Senator Michael Tipping, passed the state Senate with a bipartisan 25-9 ([link removed]) vote on June 13. The state House engrossed the legislation the following day with a voice vote after previously approving an earlier version of the bill on June 8 ([link removed]) . The bill now heads to Democratic Governor Janet Mills’ desk.
Maine’s legislation follows similar bills passed in Connecticut ([link removed]) and Colorado ([link removed]) last month. Colorado’s law prohibits utilities from charging their customers for legislative lobbying. Connecticut’s law goes further by using a more expansive definition of lobbying, prohibiting utilities from charging customers for efforts to influence administrative action by executive agencies as well. Maine’s legislation also includes a comprehensive definition of lobbying ([link removed]) , eliminating the risk of loopholes that may have left ratepayers exposed to paying for certain political advocacy activities.
All three pieces of legislation also include requirements for annual detailed disclosure filings to ensure compliance. Colorado and Maine utility regulators and customers will be able to see descriptions of the expense, including the date, payee, amount, and purpose. Connecticut utilities must also disclose any political expenses spent by the parent company directly billed or allocated to the regulated utility.
Alongside state lawmakers, other officials are pushing utility accountability reforms. The Louisiana Public Service Commission recently opened a docket to explore utilities’ political and advocacy spending that might set the stage for implementing similar restrictions. ([link removed]) Similarly, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel filedcomments ([link removed]) with utility regulators in February that requested greater transparency on utility influencing expenses.
** Maine’s investor-owned electric utilities under pressure from citizen initiative
------------------------------------------------------------
The passage of LD 325 comes at a challenging time for Central Maine Power (CMP) and Versant, Maine’s two investor-owned electric utilities, which are campaigning against a citizen initiative to establish a statewide consumer-owned utility. To date, political action committees affiliated with CMP and Versant have spent over $15 million fighting the initiative ([link removed]) that would force the electric utilities to sell their regulated assets to a non-profit called Pine Tree Power Company.
For years, the two utilities have faced scandals over reliability and other operation failures, earning them last place for consumer satisfaction scores ([link removed]) in their respective business segments.
** Utility accountability policies gain momentum after years of scandals
------------------------------------------------------------
As EPI and others have detailed, electric and gas utilities are using money that they collect from customers’ monthly bills to fund political machines that push legislation, curry favor with regulators, and alter the outcomes of elections – sometimes even breaking laws in the process. In the last three years alone, the public has learned that:
* FirstEnergy, an Ohio utility, paid $60 million in bribes ([link removed]) to the Ohio House speaker’s political organization. In return the utility secured a $1 billion ratepayer-funded bailout for several of its unprofitable nuclear and coal plants, and another lucrative provision that guaranteed the profits of FirstEnergy’s Ohio utilities at ratepayers’ expense.
* Florida Power & Light spent millions of dollars on political consultants who engineered a scheme to siphon votes to third-party “ghost candidates ([link removed]) ” who were recruited to appear on the ballot for competitive state Senate seats without actually running, according to reporting by the Orlando Sentinel. The utility-backed effort targeted legislators who were trying to hold the utility accountable, the Sentinel reported.
* ComEd, the largest electric utility in Illinois, arranged jobs ([link removed].) and contracts for associates of then-Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan to influence and reward the official for his efforts to pass legislation favorable to the utility.
In at least the Ohio ([link removed]) and Illinois ([link removed]) examples, subsequent regulatory actions have made it clear that the utilities used customer money to fund portions of their schemes, while investigations into the Florida scandal remain ongoing.
** Further reading:
------------------------------------------------------------
Washington Post: Three states just barred utilities from charging customers for lobbying ([link removed])
Energy and Policy Institute: Getting Politics Out of Utility Bills; How policymakers can protect customers from being forced to fund utilities’ political machines ([link removed])
Energy and Policy Institute: Connecticut passes bill prohibiting utilities from charging ratepayers for political activities ([link removed])
Energy and Policy Institute: Colorado law prohibits utilities from spending ratepayer money on politics ([link removed])
CT Mirror: Senate passes bill to reform utility regulation in CT ([link removed])
Grist: A new law in Colorado will prevent utilities from charging customers for lobbying ([link removed])
The post Maine becomes third state this year to pass legislation prohibiting utilities from charging ratepayers for political activities ([link removed]) appeared first on Energy and Policy Institute ([link removed]) .
Read in browser » ([link removed])
[link removed] [link removed]
** Recent Articles:
------------------------------------------------------------
** Connecticut passes bill prohibiting utilities from charging ratepayers for political activities ([link removed])
** American Gas Association Facebook campaign targets agency exploring health risks of gas stoves ([link removed])
** DTE Energy shareholders reject transparency proposal ([link removed])
** Florida Legislature hands out millions in tax cuts to fossil fuel companies ([link removed])
** Colorado law prohibits utilities from spending ratepayer money on politics ([link removed]
============================================================
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
Copyright © 2023 Energy and Policy Institute, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in at our website via our Contact Us page.
Our mailing address is:
Energy and Policy Institute
P.O. Box 170399
San Francisco, CA 94117
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]
