From Claire Kelloway <[email protected]>
Subject Food & Power - Canadian Antitrust Enforcers Investigating Big Ag for Stifling Startup
Date February 13, 2020 7:02 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
On Monday, the USDA thwarted a decade of efforts to help farmers seek justice for discrimination, retaliation, and unfair treatment by meatpackers.

Did someone forward you this newsletter?

Get your own copy by subscribing here [[link removed]], and to share this story click here. [[link removed]]

Photo courtesy of iStock by Getty Images

Canadian Antitrust Enforcers Investigating Big Ag for Stifling Startup

Canada’s Competition Bureau is looking into an allegation that agribusiness giants Bayer, Corteva, BASF, Cargill, and others tried to crush an online ag retailing startup, the California-based Farmers Business Network (FBN), according to court filings reviewed by [[link removed]] The Wall Street Journal. FBN submitted a complaint to Canada’s antitrust enforcers that these dominant seed and agrichemical providers stopped supplying products to FBN’s recently acquired Canadian business.

The allegation represents an abuse of market power by leading agribusinesses to maintain control over seed and agrichemical markets in an era of retail disruption. As purchasing shifts online and as farmers rely on data-driven analysis for product and planting recommendations, agriculture corporations and startups are in an arms race for platform supremacy. The question is, who will sell farmers their seeds and chemicals and tell them what and how to plant in a digital farming future?

FBN’s online marketplace poses a threat to Big Ag players who want to corner access to critical farmer data and to channel purchases through either their own digital platforms or traditional ag retailers, where they have a competitive advantage. “These companies have no interest in a third party using data to potentially promote a product that is not theirs or to undercut the price of a trusted retailer on their own product,” says Jason Davidson, food and agriculture campaigner at Friends of the Earth.

Bayer, Corteva, BASF, and Syngenta (which is not under investigation) control much of the market for seeds and agrichemicals, selling 76% [[link removed]] of all agrichemicals globally and 76% of all soybean, 85% of all corn, and 91% of all cotton seeds [[link removed]] in the U.S. Seed and treatment costs have only gone up [[link removed]] as the number of sellers decreases, and many farmers feel like they cannot find [[link removed]] competitive, affordable options.

Startups such as FBN address this concern by promising to save farmers money on inputs. Farmers pay an annual fee to join FBN’s online marketplace and their farmer-sourced database, where farmers compare [[link removed]] seed and chemical prices alongside their performance. Founded by former Google executives and funded by Google’s venture capital arm, FBN aims to cut costs by removing traditional seed and chemical retailers and selling generic versions of popular chemicals directly to farmers. FBN has also started a seed line.

FBN, and other startups, such as Indigo [[link removed]] and Farmobile [[link removed]], also compete with Big Ag in the growing digital agriculture industry. Startups and leading agribusinesses are fighting to create integrated digital platforms where farmers can buy their inputs and receive data-driven farm management advice tailored to their operation (such as identifying which fields may need less fertilizer, based on data from soil sensors). Corporations aggregate many farmers’ soil, weather, production, and yield data to create predictive algorithms that guide farming recommendations.

Naturally, Big Ag wants farmers to buy products and get management advice from their platforms, where the giants can promote their own products. BASF, for instance, offers farmers rebates for buying its inputs with its ag-tech platform.

Big Ag also wants to corner access [[link removed]] to farmers’ production data, because more data mean more accurate software. Information on who is buying which products and when is also essential for marketing, and Big Ag corporations do not want competitors encroaching on this information.

“For a startup to collect data not only on how effective their products are, but who’s buying them – that is essentially taking super valuable marketing data and putting it into an outside company,” explains Davidson. “I think they’re really scared.”

Seed and chemical corporation officials have said that they prefer to work with traditional ag retailers for their local expertise and service, according to the Journal. However, brick-and-mortar ag retailers are economically dependent on large rebates [[link removed]] from [[link removed]] agribusiness tied to sales goals. Pushing the Big Four’s products is baked into the traditional ag retailing business model. “It’s certainly a much less level playing field at these brick and mortar stores because of these relationships,” says Davidson.

By comparison, FBN crowdsources seed and chemical pricing from farmers, to help them sort through opaque pricing schemes and find the best deal, which could be a generic product. FBN alleges that major seed and chemical purveyors tried to squash its marketplace by refusing to sell FBN their products. In the case under Canadian investigation, FBN acquired a Saskatchewan-based agriculture retail business, to expand its business into Canada. After the acquisition, seed and agrichemical companies stopped selling products to the retailer, FBN says.

FBN says this isn’t the first time that agribusiness corporations have cut it off. “We’ve faced an extreme amount of resistance from the industry at being able to bring what should be very basic services to growers,” Charles Baron, FBN’s co-founder and chief innovation officer, told the Journal. Without leading brands, FBN relies on selling generic agrichemicals, and it’s even started to develop its own seeds [[link removed]].

Canada’s Competition Bureau requested correspondence from Bayer, BASF, Corteva, Cargill, which does some crop inputs retailing [[link removed]] in Canada, and chemical distributor Univar, among others, related to FBN’s Canadian business. Antitrust officials also requested the corporations’ online sales policies and supply arrangements with other Canadian retailers.

Agency officials already have some documents that suggest a coordinated effort among the corporations to block FBN, according to court filings reviewed by The Wall Street Journal.

Representatives from Bayer, Corteva, and Cargill told the Journal that their conduct did not violate antitrust law, and a representative from Univar said the distributor ended business with FBN because of unaligned objectives.

Find and share this story originally published on the Open Markets Blog [[link removed]]

What We're Reading

The USDA’s inspector general is reviewing the agency’s farmer trade relief program and the removal of pork processing line speeds, auditors said at a hearing on Tuesday. During the hearing, Rep. Rosa DeLauro criticized USDA for not opening an investigation into Brazilian beef packer JBS. (Politico’s Morning Agriculture [[link removed]])

Reps. Deb Haaland (D-NM) and Chellie Pingree (D-ME), along with Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ), introduced a resolution [[link removed]] supporting a Farmers Bill of Rights [[link removed]] that outlines 10 principles for fair agricultural markets. The resolution focuses specifically on addressing corporate consolidation and supporting historically underserved farmers. ( Press Release [[link removed]])

Corteva announced it will phase out [[link removed]] its controversial chlorpyrifos-based pesticide by the end of the year. (The Counter)

About the Open Markets Institute

The Open Markets Institute promotes political, industrial, economic, and environmental resilience. We do so by documenting and clarifying the dangers of extreme consolidation, and by fostering discussions of ways to reestablish America’s political economy on a more stable and fair foundation.

Follow F&P on Twitter [[link removed]] | Subscribe [[link removed]] to this Newsletter | F&P Website [[link removed]] | Contact Us [[link removed]]

Written by Claire Kelloway

Edited by Phil Longman and Michael Bluhm

Open Markets Institute

1440 G Street NW

Washington D.C., xxxxxx Tweet [link removed] Share [[link removed]] Forward [link removed] Unsubscribe [link removed]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis